Laurent's theorem states that a holomorphic function on has a unique expansion , converging absolutely there and uniformly on compact subannuli, with
Here has a simple zero at zero and no other zero in . Hence has only a simple pole there, giving the stated series with no powers below . Multiplying by and comparing the constant, linear and quadratic coefficients yields
Use the coefficient integrals on the two circles. The annular region between them contains exactly the simple poles , and the residue of at each is . Apply the residue theorem to between the circles:
For lower indices, set because the inner Laurent series has no such terms; the same contour argument then still applies. Since is odd, its even-index coefficients vanish. A complete explicit list for the requested range is
The subtraction accounts for the two poles crossed; using the inner coefficients unchanged outside their annulus would miss precisely these terms.
For , integrate over the upper semicircle of radius . The arc tends to zero, since there and the denominator is of order . The sole pole is , of residue , so the real part gives . The integrand defining is even in , and by the arctangent integral. Hence
For use with a small clockwise semicircular indentation above zero. Its residue at zero is one, so the small arc tends to . The pole has residue , and the large arc again vanishes. Thus
The imaginary part is the ordinary convergent integral : its apparent singularity at zero is removable, with limit , and its tails are absolutely integrable. Therefore for . Oddness in and the value zero at give
Differentiation is valid at every real , including zero. Indeed the mean value theorem bounds the absolute difference quotient of with respect to by , an integrable majorant independent of . Dominated convergence therefore gives . In particular both one-sided derivatives at zero equal .
The complex fundamental theorem of calculus says that for a holomorphic antiderivative and a piecewise path from to , one has . The integral is therefore zero on a closed path; the antiderivative need only be defined on a neighborhood of that path, rather than on all its interior.
The assumptions make holomorphic near . Differentiate:
Integrate this derivative around the closed path to obtain
For a positively oriented simple closed piecewise smooth curve, a point inside it and a function holomorphic on a neighborhood of the curve and its interior, Cauchy's differentiated integral formula is
The printed denominator uses while the derivative and factorial use . The standard formula requires these indices to agree; the intended exponent in this display is . The private transcription preserves the mismatch exactly.
For the following task, write near zero with . Thus extends holomorphically at zero, and is holomorphic inside the specified contour because has no other zeros there. Now . Apply the correctly indexed formula with derivative order to get
Positive winding one supplies the orientation and multiplicity used in this expression.
Choose a small positively oriented circle in within the convergence disk of the inverse series. Cauchy's coefficient formula gives
Let . The biholomorphism property makes it a simple positively oriented closed curve about zero. Under , and , so
The last equality is (a). Apply (b), giving
This is the local Lagrange inversion theorem; the simple zero ensures that the expression being differentiated has a removable singularity and a nonzero value at zero.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.