For the Abelian case of Cauchy theorem for groups, use induction on . Choose . If divides , then has order . Otherwise is a nontrivial normal subgroup of order prime to , and has smaller order still divisible by . Induction gives a coset of order ; any lift has order divisible by , because the order of its image divides its own order. A suitable power of then has order . This uses no classification of finite Abelian groups.
For a finite p-group, the class equation is
where the sum is over noncentral conjugacy classes. Each index is a positive power of , hence divisible by . Therefore divides , and the center of a group is nontrivial.
If with and , this is already a proper nontrivial normal subgroup. If , the group is Abelian; the established case of Cauchy theorem for groups gives a subgroup of order , which is normal and proper. Thus
If with , a Sylow p-subgroup has order . The Sylow theorems say that such subgroups exist; every p-subgroup is contained in one; they are all conjugate; and their number divides and satisfies .
Suppose with distinct primes and were simple. A Sylow subgroup of order has order , and divides , so or . If , conjugation gives a nontrivial homomorphism . Its kernel is normal and, by simplicity, trivial. Hence would divide by Lagrange's theorem, impossible because has only one factor of .
If , distinct Sylow subgroups of order meet only in the identity and together contain nonidentity elements. Only elements of remain, including the identity. Every Sylow p-subgroup lies entirely in that remaining set and itself has elements. They must therefore all be the same subgroup, making it normal, again a contradiction. Thus no group of order is simple. If , the preceding p-group argument applies.
For distinct , a finite Abelian group is the direct product of groups of its primary subgroups. A group of order is either cyclic or has every nonidentity element of order , in which case choosing two independent elements gives . Consequently the possibilities are
If the primes coincide, the Fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups gives instead , , and . This classification is used only for the requested list, not for the proof above.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.