The term is the bulk-diffusion search cost: increasing the effective length of DNA searched after each encounter enlarges the useful capture region and reduces this contribution. The term is the accumulated sliding cost. Approximately DNA landing-and-sliding episodes, each taking order , give . These are scaling estimates; geometric constants and correlated revisits are omitted by the supplied model.
Thus the facilitated target search is slow as , because too little sequence is examined per encounter, and slow at very large , because sliding and repeated local exploration take too long. A finite intermediate minimum balances 1D scanning against 3D relocation. The right panel of the figure in solution shows the two contributions and their sum. The model requires a useful range of sliding lengths below the full chromosome length, finite positive diffusion coefficients and effective relocation between episodes; it is not a claim that arbitrarily large is physically available.
Write and . Then , so
Therefore
At the optimum, the two contributions are equal. Expressing the optimal sliding length directly in terms of the minimum time gives
These relations concern the optimal point; a general nonminimal time can correspond to two different sliding lengths. A geometric or kinetic restriction on the allowed sliding length can instead place the optimum at a boundary.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.