Differentiation of the restricted free energy gives the magnetization
In the weak-field limit , , so
The printed coefficient is inconsistent with the stated moment . The requested expression without the factor four would follow from in this restricted model. This discrepancy is present in the original PDF, rather than introduced by its transcription.
For completeness, differentiating the full thermal free energy gives
Its weak-field form is
At this approaches , so restoring the two nonmagnetic ground states does not recover the printed coefficient either. The inverse-temperature Curie law form is valid, but the population factor and moment squared must be retained consistently.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.