For zero damping the conserved mechanical energy isFor , the potential grows to infinity in both directions, so every nonstationary finite-energy trajectory is trapped between two turning points and is periodic; the zero-energy solution is stationary. The case is the harmonic oscillator. The negative- comparison extends the parameter range initially stated in the source.
For , the origin lies in a local potential well, with barriers at of height . A trajectory launched from the origin oscillates precisely when its initial energy is below that barrier:At equality the trajectory approaches a barrier equilibrium asymptotically, rather than being periodic; for example the positive branch is . Above the barrier the trajectory escapes the well. The source's inequality without the absolute value tacitly takes ; for signed initial velocity the energy criterion requires .
Next set and assume . The energy satisfies . This bounds the complete trajectory. The zero-dissipation set is the union of and , and its only invariant trajectory is the origin: a nonzero point on either axis immediately leaves it under the differential equation. The LaSalle invariance principle therefore gives . If as well, damping is absent and that conclusion fails for nonzero ; the positive order-one damping assumption is essential.
For the weakly nonlinear periodic motion, write , set , , and expand . The first correction obeysResonant forcing at the fundamental frequency would generate secular terms. Eliminating both coefficients yieldsConsequently the maximum displacement is for fixed positive . A possible third-harmonic correction is , up to homogeneous amplitude and phase choices. The leading amplitude also balances averaged damping: its slow evolution is , whose nonzero fixed point is attracting. The case is a degenerate zero-amplitude limit, rather than a nonzero limit cycle.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.