The Galois group acts transitively on the roots because is irreducible and separable. The orbit-stabilizer theorem gives
so divides . Equivalently, the tower law gives , while the finite Galois extension has group order .
For the root-discriminant convention in the requested identity, define
The Vandermonde determinant is . Squaring removes the signs, proving
It is nonzero because the roots are distinct. It lies in , since its root expression is fixed by every Galois automorphism and .
If is not monic and has leading coefficient , the usual polynomial discriminant is . Thus the printed Vandermonde equality uses the discriminant of the monic normalization . The extra factor is itself a nonzero square in , so it does not alter the square-class criterion in the next part.
First assume . Set . If with , then in the field , so . For an automorphism inducing the root permutation ,
Since fixes and in , every induced permutation has positive sign. The root action is faithful because the roots generate , giving
This is the discriminant criterion for an alternating Galois group.
As printed for arbitrary fields, the assertion is false in characteristic two. Over , the polynomial is irreducible and separable, with roots in . Their difference is one, so the discriminant is the square . Nevertheless its Galois group is , whereas is trivial. In characteristic two the permutation signs become indistinguishable as field elements; square discriminants in characteristic two therefore cannot detect the alternating subgroup in this way.
Denote the three stated pair sums by . They are pairwise distinct: for example,
and the other differences factor similarly. Every Galois automorphism fixes each , and hence fixes each of the three corresponding partitions of four roots into two pairs. The kernel of the permutation action on these partitions is
Thus embeds in the Klein four-group. By part (a), divides , and the containing group has order four. Consequently
This Split resolvent criterion for a Klein four Galois group uses the cubic resolvent of a quartic. The pair-sum differences remain nonzero in characteristic two, so this proof does not need the missing characteristic assumption from part (c).

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.