For quantum key distribution with Bell pairs, a source distributes one photon to Alice and its partner to Bob. One implementation is the Ekert protocol, using the spin singlet state . Each party independently chooses a polarization measurement setting after distribution. Equal settings give opposite outcomes; Bob reverses his outcome-to-bit assignment so these rounds give matching random bits. Other setting pairs test a Bell inequality, with ideal spin singlet state correlation for the corresponding Bloch sphere axes. The optical polarizer angles correspond to twice those angles on the appropriate Bloch sphere great circle.
Over an authenticated public classical channel, Alice and Bob announce settings and detection times, select coincident detection rounds, and perform key sifting. They reveal a test sample to estimate the quantum bit error rate and the chosen Bell inequality signal, discarding all revealed bits. Excess disturbance causes an abort. Otherwise information reconciliation makes the retained strings agree and privacy amplification shortens them to remove an adversary's residual information, including information disclosed during reconciliation. The tested quantum entanglement supplies correlations unavailable to an independently prepared classical mixture; a security claim also requires stated detector and sampling assumptions.[ref]
Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem by Artur K. Ekert. 1991, entanglement-based key distribution and Bell-correlation test
Each photon polarization analyzer uses a setting-dependent waveplate followed by a polarizing beam splitter. A single-photon detector on each output converts the routed photon into an electrical click, recording the outcome and its time. For example, a single-photon avalanche diode is a reverse-biased photodiode operated above breakdown: absorption creates a charge carrier, impact ionization triggers an avalanche, and the resulting pulse is registered. A quenching circuit lowers the bias to stop the avalanche and then resets the device. The detector dead time during recovery limits the count rate; dark counts produce false clicks, and imperfect detection loses rounds. The polarization information comes from the preceding analyzer, while the detector registers which output fired. Coincidence timing associates Alice's and Bob's records with the same emitted pair. [ref]
https://www.thorlabs.co.jp/images/Catalog/V21/V21_7_LightAnalysis.pdf. Thorlabs, Light Analysis catalogue, Single Photon Counter Modules: Geiger-mode operation, active quenching, blind time and dark counts
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.