At the undercooling below the eutectoid temperature is small, so the free-energy driving force for forming pearlite is weak and nucleation is difficult. At the driving force is larger, but carbon diffusion is slow, limiting the coupled growth of ferrite and cementite. Their competition produces the nose of the isothermal transformation diagram near and . A roughly linear quench from – must pass left of this nose, requiring a rate of order –, then continue below the martensite-start region near . The tangent to the full start curve, rather than just the nose, refines this estimate; a true continuous-cooling diagram would be preferable. Martensite forms by a coordinated lattice-shape change without long-range carbon partitioning, so its formation is a displacive transformation. The tetragonal-to-monoclinic transformation of zirconia is a nonmetallic example.
As-quenched martensite generally has greater hardness and strength, but lower ductility and toughness, than ordinary pearlitic steel. Its supersaturated carbon and distorted lattice impede dislocation glide; quench stresses also promote cracking. Pearlite combines hard cementite lamellae with more deformable ferrite, with finer spacings generally giving greater strength. Austenitize, quench to martensite, then temper to obtain a useful compromise between indentation resistance and resistance to fast fracture. Tempering below the austenitizing range relieves stresses and develops a fine carbide-containing microstructure. It trades some maximum hardness for improved toughness; the temperature and time must suit the required balance.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.