The material frame of a rod obeys the director kinematics of a rod
In the stress-free reference configuration, the constitutive equation gives , , and , since all three stiffnesses are positive. Thus . Its cross product with vanishes, so
Consequently this director is a fixed vector in space, even though the other two directors rotate along the elastic rod.
The right-handed material frame of a rod has and . Hence the director kinematics of a rod reduce to
Solving these constant-coefficient ordinary differential equations with the given initial frame gives
The inextensible rod has . An integration using yields, for ,
Indeed,
so the centreline is a circular arc of radius in the plane perpendicular to . The continuous limit is , , and .
The second moment of area about an axis weights each element of cross-sectional area by its squared perpendicular distance from that axis. The ellipse extends farther along than along , so its material lies, on balance, farther from the axis. Therefore
With zero intrinsic curvature of an elastic filament, the respective bending moments required by the constitutive equation are and . Thus their magnitudes satisfy
for : bending about the minor axis is harder. Here is Young's modulus, and is the corresponding bending stiffness.
Zero applied end force and the force balance imply everywhere. The moment balance then reduces to .
Choose an untwisted straight configuration: all three directors are constant, , and . The constitutive equation gives
which is constant in space and therefore satisfies the moment balance. The required end bending moment is consequently
Its sign opposes the positive intrinsic curvature of an elastic filament. If the initial position and frame from part (ii) are retained, this solution is simply with ; the clamp supplies the opposite reaction moment at the other end.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.