Past exam of the mathematical methods II course of the University of Oxford / 2021 / 11 / vi / Solution

The result depends on the component amplitudes and wave phases; adding many frequencies does not by itself guarantee one localized wave packet. For a definite sketch, take many equally spaced wavenumbers $k_j=k_0+j\Delta k$ in the same fixed band, with equal, aligned complex amplitudes $B/N$. Linearize the dispersion relation as $\omega (k_j)\simeq {\omega }_c+v_g(k_j-k_0)$, where ${\omega }_c=k_0^2/m$. Then with $\xi =x-v_{g}t$ the wave envelope isfor odd $N$. This is a normalized Dirichlet kernel: constructive interference occurs near $\xi =0$, while most other positions undergo partial cancellation. At finite $N$ there are repeated groups separated by $2\pi /\Delta k$.

As $N$ grows with the half-bandwidth $K$ fixed, $\Delta k$ decreases and the repetition spacing grows. The continuous flat-band limit isThus a sinc function envelope has a central group between its first zeros at $\xi =\pm \pi /K$, smaller side lobes and rapidly oscillating crests. At fixed bandwidth the limiting central width is $2\pi /K$; it does not shrink indefinitely just because more components are added. Smoother spectral weights can reduce the side lobes, and random wave phases would produce a different shape.

For the exact quadratic dispersion relation,The additional quadratic wave phase makes the wave packet spread and change shape. The translating sinc function approximation is valid while $|t|K^2/|m|\ll 1$; the preceding figure is the exact $t=0$ comparison, where that approximation introduces no error.