Every projective line on the smooth algebraic surface through lies in the projective tangent plane , since its tangent direction is contained in the surface's Zariski tangent space. The plane section is a nonzero plane cubic. It cannot be the entire plane, since a smooth cubic surface is irreducible and has no plane component.
Each distinct projective line through is therefore a distinct degree-one factor of the cubic restricted to . A degree-three polynomial has at most three such factors. Hence there are at most three lines through any point. This is the lines through a point of a smooth cubic surface bound; equality is allowed when the tangent section consists of three concurrent lines.
Use coordinates in which and write the defining cubic aswith homogeneous polynomials of degree two. Their restrictions , have no common zero: at such a zero all first partial derivatives of would vanish. The rational projection therefore extends to a morphism of algebraic varietiesIndeed, wherever , the surface equation gives , which remains regular on ; the analogous formula works wherever .
For the plane with , , its plane section is together with the residual plane conicThese residual plane conics are exactly the fibres of a morphism of , giving the conic bundle from a line on a smooth cubic surface. The family itself is smooth: off it is the graph of projection, and over the condition chooses the unique value .
Write with and symmetric. The degrees of its entries in areThus the conic discriminant is a homogeneous polynomial of degree five.
Smoothness also shows that every zero of is simple and has matrix rank two. To see the first point, at a rank-two singular fibre let span the kernel and use a local base coordinate . All fibre-coordinate derivatives vanish at , so smoothness of the total family requires . Since the adjugate matrix of a rank-two symmetric matrix is a nonzero scalar multiple of , the determinant derivative is nonzero. If the rank were at most one, the projective kernel would contain a line, on which the quadratic has a zero over the algebraically closed field; that point would be singular in the total family. This proves the reduced singular fibres of a smooth conic bundle assertion and also rules out vanishing identically.
The discriminant quintic of a cubic surface conic bundle consequently has five distinct zeros in . At each, a rank-two plane conic splits into two distinct projective lines . Neither equals : that would require to vanish identically, making proportional, contrary to their having no common zero. The original plane section is therefore , proving the required coplanarity and giving five distinct pairs.
The two projective lines in the th pair form the fibre of a morphism of the extended conic bundle from a line on a smooth cubic surface constructed above. Distinct points of the projective line have disjoint inverse images, soThe extension of across matters: arguing only that distinct planes through meet along would not by itself exclude intersections there. The formula excludes them as well. Lines within a single pair do intersect; the assertion concerns different pairs.
Choose one projective line from each of two different pairs. They are skew lines by the preceding disjointness result. After a projective linear coordinate change call themFor , , their joining line meets the cubic surface at and a third point. This defines a rational map on the Zariski-open set where that third intersection is distinct and the joining line is not contained in .
More explicitly, because vanishes on both projective lines,The third point is . Both polynomials are nonzero: if either vanished identically, one of the two projective lines would lie in the singular locus. Thus supplies a nonempty Zariski-open set.
Conversely, a point outside lies on the unique joining line whose endpoints have coordinates on and on . This is a rational inverse on the same generic locus. The rational parametrization of a cubic surface from two skew lines givesThe latter contains the affine plane as a dense open subset, as does . Hence is birational to .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.