Use the Boussinesq approximation and a top-hat plume model. Let be the uniform ambient return velocity outside the plume. Negligible source volume flux and an impermeable cylindrical wall require zero net transport through every horizontal section:
The entrainment speed must be specified relative to that moving ambient. Taking it to be gives
The surrounding unmodified fluid has zero buoyancy relative to the initial fluid. Neglecting thermal or compositional loss therefore gives
Let denote the conserved specific source buoyancy flux: if is the actual integrated source flux, or if the source strength has already been normalized by .
To obtain the usual integral-model singularity one must also state a pressure closure. Here take the whole-section mean pressure to have only its reference ambient hydrostatic pressure, and neglect wall force and extra vertical turbulent-stress fluxes in the integral budget. Internal momentum transfers between plume and ambient cancel in that whole-section balance. The remaining upward force is the plume buoyancy, giving
The two momentum fluxes add, even though is negative: vertical momentum transported downward also contributes to the flux through an upward-oriented horizontal section. These three flux balances, with the algebraic return-velocity constraint, govern in the confined plume with compensating return flow.
The pressure-neglecting closure is an integral approximation, not a claim that the return fluid has zero acceleration. If a mean pressure departure is retained, the whole-section momentum balance instead contains , along with any wall-force or stress contribution. The entrainment hypothesis alone does not specify that function. The singularity calculated below belongs to the stated pressure-neglecting model; it is not forced by continuity alone or asserted to be an infinite velocity in the real fluid.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.