Expose the vertices in order, revealing at step every edge from vertex to an earlier vertex. With the resulting filtration , put
This is the vertex exposure for chromatic number martingale. Its increments have conditional mean zero and satisfy , by the permitted Lipschitz condition.
Here is the required exponential-moment proof of the Azuma-Hoeffding inequality. More generally, suppose for deterministic . Convexity of the exponential function gives, for ,
Taking conditional expectation and using the zero conditional mean yields
For the last inequality, integrate for , and use evenness. A zero simply means a zero increment. Iterated conditional expectation now gives
For , the strict Markov bound on the event gives
The strict inequality follows directly by integrating on that event; it is also immediate if the event is empty. Optimize at and apply the same argument to the negative increments. For and , the union bound proves, for every ,
At the displayed strict bound is trivial.
For the second conclusion write and choose a fixed . If , then , whose probability is less than . Thus the given positive probability forces . For sufficiently large ,
Here the non-strict one-sided bound follows by the usual non-strict Markov inequality. Consequently the asserted upper bound holds with high probability, uniformly over any sequence satisfying the stated assumption.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.