Adding times the equation for to the equation for combines the two real amplitudes into . With the fluctuating coupling absent, the derivative terms satisfy , so the complex evolution is
Both real amplitudes satisfy the zero Dirichlet boundary condition, hence . A unit-modulus change of dependent variable removes the first derivative: put . Direct differentiation gives
The eigenfunctions satisfying the Dirichlet boundary condition are therefore , with temporal eigenvalues
The first nonzero stationary mode appears when , giving
The complex constant supplies the phase freedom of this unperturbed mean-field dynamo model.
To display the dipole and quadrupole parity in a mean-field dynamo, center the coordinate at the midpoint: , , . Choose a real amplitude . The dipole choice is , so
Here is an even function and an odd function of , and the cosine envelope vanishes at both boundaries. The quadrupole choice is , which gives
Now is an odd function and an even function. Both choices have the same stationary threshold because the unperturbed complex equation is invariant under a constant phase rotation.
Write and , with each coefficient satisfying the zero Dirichlet boundary condition. The steady complex equation, including the fluctuating coupling, is . Since , its order- terms give
This is a regular perturbation equation for the threshold shift. The right projection uses the complex inner product, not a bilinear product without conjugation.
The linear operator is self-adjoint on the domain in complex L2 space. For functions in that domain, two integration by parts steps give
The boundary term vanishes. In particular is formally self-adjoint: both complex conjugation of and integration by parts contribute a minus sign. Taking , and using proves
This is the Fredholm solvability condition for a self-adjoint operator. Define and . The gauged sine mode has
since the real envelope contributes an integral of its own derivative, whose endpoint term is zero. In particular the denominator in the solvability condition is nonzero. Therefore
For either parity choice this expression is real. Indeed , and are even about the midpoint, while is odd. Hence , and the last numerator reduces to .
No integral evaluation is needed to compare the two shifts. The phase change gives , , and leaves and unchanged. Thus , and
Equivalently, the term involving vanishes by parity, while reverses the remaining perturbation numerator. This is parity splitting of a mean-field dynamo threshold: the perturbation breaks the phase degeneracy and lowers one onset threshold by the amount it raises the other.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.