Interpret the Fourier transform as a distributional Fourier transform. Exponentially regularize the Heaviside step function:
As , the first term tends to in the tempered distribution sense, since its integral is and it concentrates at zero. The second tends to . Therefore
The principal-value convention is essential: the printed is not an ordinary integrable function at zero. This normalization also satisfies , the Fourier transform of a derivative version of .
The real-space expression means the principal-value reciprocal distribution. Apply even exponential damping. Oddness gives
Differentiate the integral with respect to ; its derivative is . Its value at is zero, so the integral equals . Taking gives
The limit is a tempered distribution limit: the regularized transforms are uniformly bounded and converge away from zero, allowing dominated convergence against a Schwartz function. This Fourier transform of a principal-value reciprocal argument also establishes the needed Dirichlet integral in its Abel interpretation.
The locally integrable logarithm has distributional derivative . By the Fourier transform of a derivative and the previous result,
For , this gives . At zero the expression must be extended as a Hadamard finite-part integral, not treated as a locally integrable function. For example, define the finite-part inverse-absolute-value distribution by
Then . Different reference cutoffs change only by a multiple of the Dirac delta distribution. The general solution of the transform equation is consequently
Indeed multiplication by annihilates only a delta term among distributions supported at zero; delta derivatives would generate additional nonzero terms. This supplies the precise interpretation of the paper's formula, and the convention-dependent constant need not be found.
For a locally integrable periodic function, its Fourier series coefficients are . Window the function to one period by . With the stated Fourier transform convention,
There is no extra factor of : the Fourier coefficient already integrates over a period of length one.
For a completely arbitrary periodic distribution, multiplication by a discontinuous window need not be defined, for example at a derivative of a delta supported on a period boundary. The sharp-window assertion therefore presupposes a windowing convention or enough regularity at the endpoints. The smooth-window Fourier coefficients of a periodic distribution use a smooth compactly supported partition-of-unity window with ; then in the distribution sense. The logarithmic example below is locally integrable, so the printed sharp window is legitimate and no ambiguity affects it.
For , put . Symmetry gives, for integer ,
An integration by parts has no endpoint term: at zero and at the upper endpoint. It follows that
where the sine integral is . Its limiting value follows from the Abel-regularized calculation in part (ii); integration by parts of its tail gives for positive integer . Hence the Fourier coefficients of a periodic logarithmic singularity have
The first term is the requested leading behaviour. Its alternating sign records the singularity at half a period, and its decay records the logarithmic cusp. The correction comes from the derivative mismatch across the periodically joined endpoints. Also and , consistent with the real symmetric profile.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.