For this Neumann Poisson problem, interpret the forcing in , as is automatic if it is smooth up to the boundary. Literal interior smoothness alone does not ensure the integrals or bounded functionals required in this question: for example, on is interior smooth but even diverges. Classical regularity in the converse is likewise understood up to the boundary.
Suppose the weak solution is smooth on . Testing against compactly supported test functions gives in distributions and hence pointwise. Now the weak identity and Green's first identity implyfor every smooth on . Every smooth boundary function has such an extension, so on . This proves both the interior equation and the boundary condition.
Conversely, for satisfying the equation and zero normal derivative, Green's first identity gives the weak identity for all smooth on . The density of smooth functions in a Sobolev space and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality extend it continuously to every . Thus the classical solution is a weak solution, and the smooth weak solution is classical.
Subtract the two weak solution identities and test with their difference . ThenA Sobolev function with zero weak gradient is constant on each connected component. One justification is to mollify locally: each mollification has zero gradient and is constant on its ball, and overlaps identify the constants; taking limits gives the original assertion. Since is connected, is one constant on .
Conversely, adding a constant changes neither the weak derivative nor the weak identity. The solution is unique up to an additive constant.
There is a normalization error in the PDF. With the printed unnormalized integral, testing a constant function equal to one would give a left side and a right side zero. Thus that formulation fails whenever .
Use instead the average . The Poincare-Wirtinger inequality, also called the Neumann-Poincare inequality, isIf no exists, subtract the average and normalize a violating sequence to obtain with , , and . This sequence is bounded in the Sobolev space . The Rellich-Kondrachov compactness theorem supplies a subsequence converging strongly in to .
For every compactly supported test function , integration by parts and these convergences give . Thus has zero weak gradient. The Sobolev function with zero weak gradient result and connectedness make constant. Strong convergence preserves its zero integral, so . It also preserves its norm one, a contradiction. This proves the correctly normalized Neumann-Poincare inequality.
Work in the mean-zero Sobolev spaceThe integral is a continuous functional on , so is closed. The Neumann-Poincare inequality shows that is equivalent to the usual norm on , making a complete inner product there.
For the functional satisfiesThe Riesz representation theorem, or the Lax-Milgram theorem, gives a unique with for all . To recover every test, write . The constant contributes zero to and contributes to . Thus the same equality holds for all .
A weak solution exists whenever ; fixing its average to zero makes it unique. Moreover and the Neumann-Poincare inequality also controls .
The constant function is an admissible test for the Neumann Poisson problem. Its weak gradient is zero, so the weak identity immediately givesThis is necessary, and the preceding Hilbert-space construction proves sufficiency for . It is the balance condition corresponding to zero total boundary flux.
The clamped second-order Sobolev space is . On a smooth bounded domain the Sobolev trace theorem characterizes it by zero value and zero normal derivative on the boundary. In particular, its whole first-order boundary jet is zero, since tangential derivatives of the zero trace also vanish. As above, assume and classical regularity up to the boundary.
For a smooth weak solution, compactly supported test functions and two integrations by parts giveso pointwise. Membership in supplies on . Thus it is a classical solution of the clamped biharmonic problem.
Conversely, a classical solution with these traces belongs to . For every compactly supported test function, two integrations by parts give . Both sides are continuous for the norm, so the defining density of in extends this equality to every required test. The two notions agree under the stated smoothness.
The difference of two weak solutions lies in the clamped second-order Sobolev space. Testing with yields , so . Since , integration by parts givesThe Poincare inequality for zero boundary values now implies . The clamped biharmonic problem has at most one weak solution. Unlike the Neumann Poisson problem, no additive constant is allowed by these boundary traces.
For , two integrations by parts give the clamped Hessian identityBy density it remains valid on . Each has zero integral, first for compactly supported test functions and then by convergence. Applying the Neumann-Poincare inequality to each givesThe zero-boundary Poincare inequality also gives . Hence, using a full-Hessian equivalent norm,Thus is an inner product whose norm is equivalent to the complete norm on the clamped second-order Sobolev space. The functional is bounded for this norm by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the displayed bound. Apply the Riesz representation theorem, or the Lax-Milgram theorem, to get a unique representing . The clamped biharmonic problem has a unique weak solution for every , with and no zero-integral compatibility condition.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.