Use the ratio definition of cutoff from part (a), and write . In the reversible Markov chain setting of the preceding parts let and . In particular .
If did not tend to infinity, there would be a subsequence and for which . Along it part (c) implies, for every fixed ,Since , choose fixed so small that . The lower limit of this ratio is then greater than one, contradicting cutoff for Markov chains. Thus the Peres product condition holds:In fact the argument with proves the stronger absolute-gap product condition. Part (d) does not repeat the reversible Markov chain hypothesis; the ordinary real ordering of eigenvalues above uses that hypothesis. If arbitrary chains are intended, define the spectral gap explicitly: the eigenvalue lower bound for total variation mixing works for complex eigenfunctions too, and proves the same assertion for or for , which is at least . No real ordering of complex eigenvalues is implicit.
For the requested counterexample take nonlazy simple random walk on the complete graph , . Let have every row equal to the uniform distribution on a finite set, and let . ThenThus and : every fixed-level mixing time is eventually one. This is a bounded-time jump satisfying the ratio definition of cutoff. The ordinary spectral gap is and the absolute one is , so both products with tend to one, not infinity. The divergence assumption on is therefore essential under this convention.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.