For a finite irreducible Markov chain that is an aperiodic Markov chain, setHere is its unique stationary distribution, and the distance is total variation distance. Applying a Markov kernel contracts total variation distance, so is nonincreasing and the minimum is finite.
Use the ratio definition of cutoff: a family has cutoff for Markov chains if, for every fixed ,with the denominator positive eventually. Thus the transition between any two fixed distance levels takes negligible time compared with the mixing time scale. By monotonicity and squeezing, this also gives for any fixed .
Some definitions of cutoff for Markov chains additionally require the mixing time to diverge. That extra requirement cannot be built into the definition here: the final request in part (d) explicitly asks for a bounded-time counterexample. The ratio convention is the one consistent with that request.
Take the real inner productThe stationary distribution is strictly positive for an irreducible Markov chain. Detailed balance gives , so is a self-adjoint operator. Choose a real orthonormal eigenbasis , where , , , , and for .
For fixed , apply the spectral decomposition to . Its coefficient against is , whereas . Thus the spectral kernel expansion of a reversible chain isThis holds for all integers ; at each multiplier is one, including when . Negative eigenvalues are allowed, and retain their signs for odd .
Let be the number of states and putThe absolute L2 spectral gap of a reversible Markov chain is ; in this question the relaxation time means the absolute relaxation time. For a nonlazy reversible Markov chain, it may differ from the reciprocal of the ordinary spectral gap . For a finite irreducible Markov chain that is an aperiodic Markov chain, .
For , choose a real eigenfunction whose eigenvalue has modulus , and an initial state maximizing . It has , and the definition of total variation distance impliesThis is the eigenvalue lower bound for total variation mixing, . At , for ,The second inequality follows from , the supplied inequality with . Since ,When the left side is zero, so no logarithm of zero is needed. For the left side is nonpositive and the conclusion is automatic. A one-state chain has mixing time zero; with the convention the bound is again trivial.
Use the ratio definition of cutoff from part (a), and write . In the reversible Markov chain setting of the preceding parts let and . In particular .
If did not tend to infinity, there would be a subsequence and for which . Along it part (c) implies, for every fixed ,Since , choose fixed so small that . The lower limit of this ratio is then greater than one, contradicting cutoff for Markov chains. Thus the Peres product condition holds:In fact the argument with proves the stronger absolute-gap product condition. Part (d) does not repeat the reversible Markov chain hypothesis; the ordinary real ordering of eigenvalues above uses that hypothesis. If arbitrary chains are intended, define the spectral gap explicitly: the eigenvalue lower bound for total variation mixing works for complex eigenfunctions too, and proves the same assertion for or for , which is at least . No real ordering of complex eigenvalues is implicit.
For the requested counterexample take nonlazy simple random walk on the complete graph , . Let have every row equal to the uniform distribution on a finite set, and let . ThenThus and : every fixed-level mixing time is eventually one. This is a bounded-time jump satisfying the ratio definition of cutoff. The ordinary spectral gap is and the absolute one is , so both products with tend to one, not infinity. The divergence assumption on is therefore essential under this convention.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.