The Lévy continuity theorem states that if characteristic functions of probability distributions converge pointwise on to , and is continuous at zero, then is the characteristic function of a unique probability distribution and
Here the arrow denotes weak convergence of probability measures, equivalently convergence in distribution of associated random variables. Conversely, weak convergence of probability measures implies pointwise convergence of their characteristic functions to the characteristic function of the limit. The continuity-at-zero condition is essential to ensure that the pointwise limit is a characteristic function.
Write and . The given two-sided limit implies , so . For each fixed real , independence and the characteristic function of a sum of independent variables give
Set . For , and . The local Taylor expansion of the complex logarithm at gives
Thus ; at the identity is immediate. The limit is continuous at zero and is the characteristic function of the constant random variable . The Lévy continuity theorem proves the weak law from a characteristic-function expansion:
No integrability hypothesis has been used. The conclusion is also convergence in probability by (d)'s convergence in distribution to a constant implies convergence in probability. If the word “constant” were to allow complex , the characteristic function symmetry forces , so it is necessarily real.
Suppose with convergence in probability. For real and , the elementary inequality gives
First let , then let . The characteristic functions converge pointwise to that of , which is continuous at zero. The Lévy continuity theorem gives convergence in probability implies convergence in distribution.
For the converse, let have the fair Bernoulli distribution, put , and set for every . All have the same probability distribution as , so . But always, hence
There is no convergence in probability to . In this example does have convergence in probability to : the counterexample concerns the converse with the specified limit , as usual. If one interprets the question as denying convergence in probability to any limit, take for even and for odd . Its probability distribution is still constant, while the two subsequences have distinct limits from almost sure convergence, ruling out any common limit in probability by uniqueness of a limit in probability.
Let be the distribution function of . The limiting constant zero has distribution function for and for . For every , both and are continuity points of . Thus convergence in distribution implies and . Therefore
This proves
The same proof after subtracting a fixed real proves convergence in distribution to a constant implies convergence in probability. A deterministic limit fixes the coupling automatically; the counterexample in (c) exploits a nonconstant limit whose probability distribution alone does not fix that coupling.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.