Direct matrix multiplication gives . The three determinants are , , and . Hence , as required.
The two-by-two matrix inverse formula gives
Multiplication in the reversed order gives
The order reversal is needed because applying the inverse undoes the original two linear maps in reverse sequence.
Take , which are invertible matrices. Then , whereas . This proves that the determinant is not additive. Being a multilinear map of separate columns does not imply additivity in the entire matrix.
Again take . Their sum is also invertible, but , while . Thus matrix inversion is not additive, even when every inverse in the proposed identity exists.
Use and from part (a). The proposed unreversed product is
which differs from the actual inverse . Both original matrices are invertible matrices, so this is a valid counterexample. The universally valid order is .
The product of a matrix with another matrix requires its inner dimensions and three to match. Thus is necessary and sufficient for to be defined.
The transpose has shape . Multiplying two copies requires , so .
The shapes in are , whose inner dimensions always match. Hence every positive integer is allowed, and the resulting matrix is .
Matrix addition requires equal shapes. The shapes and agree exactly when .
A two-sided matrix inverse requires a square matrix, so is necessary. It exists only if that square matrix is also an invertible matrix, equivalently ; choosing the dimension alone does not ensure invertibility.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.