Past exam of the MPhil in micro- and nanotechnology enterprise course of the University of Cambridge / 2017 / Paper 1 / Section B / 8 / iv

The resolved periodic contrast comes principally from electron phase contrast: transmitted and diffracted electron waves interfere after passing through the image-forming optics. The resulting intensity depends on specimen thickness, orientation, defocus and the contrast transfer function; bright dots cannot automatically be labelled gold-atom positions without image simulation. The surrounding nonperiodic background is consistent with an amorphous support or contamination, but its chemistry is not determined by contrast alone.

The particle contains differently oriented fringe regions, and the Fourier transform has several opposing spot pairs with an approximately pentagonal/tenfold composite appearance. Together with the faceted outline, this is consistent with a multiply twinned gold particle, plausibly a decahedral arrangement, rather than one perfect cubic lattice with fivefold rotational symmetry. Opposite Fourier spots occur because the recorded image intensity is real; counting ten spots is not itself proof of a tenfold crystal. Overlapping domains, contrast-transfer effects and a slightly off-axis view can complicate the pattern. A tilt series or spatially windowed transforms across individual domains would test the twinning interpretation. The stability of such particles involves a competition among surface, twin-boundary and elastic strain energies.^[ref]

For cubic lattice planes, $d_{hkl}=a/\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}$. The face-centred cubic selection rule permits indices that are all odd or all even. ThusThe first two spacings exceed the quoted 0.19 nm real-space resolution, whereas $d_{220}$ does not. This restriction is for the resolved image and its transform; a diffraction instrument need not have the same cutoff.

A natural candidate is a beam near a local $⟨110⟩$ zone axis. For example, the $[110]$ zone law $h+k=0$ includes four $\{111\}$ reflections and two $\{200\}$ reflections, all within that real-space cutoff. Their reciprocal-space length ratio is $g_{200}/g_{111}=2/\sqrt{3}=1.1547$. The angle between $(1\bar{1}1)$ and $(1\bar{1}\bar{1})$ reciprocal vectors is ${\cos }^{-1}(1/3)=70.53^{\circ }$. In contrast, a $[001]$ view gives a fourfold arrangement of the resolvable $\{200\}$ family, while the lowest ordinary $[111]$ zone reflections are $\{220\}$ and would not be resolved at the stated cutoff.

In a five-domain decahedral interpretation, neighboring tetrahedral fcc regions meet on $\{111\}$ twin planes around a common near-$⟨110⟩$ axis. Five unstrained wedges supply $5\times 70.53^{\circ }=352.64^{\circ }$; elastic distortion accommodates the remaining $7.36^{\circ }$. Their rotated diffraction contributions need not resemble a single six-spot $[110]$ pattern. Near-$⟨110⟩$ fcc domains in a multiply twinned particle are a defensible orientation proposal, not a unique full indexing. The printed transform has no reciprocal-space scale or indexed spot list, so it cannot establish every domain rotation or exclude an overlapping-particle contribution. Calibrated spacings and transforms from individual regions would settle those distinctions. The five-domain geometry is independently observed in atomic-resolution gold-particle measurements.^[ref]