A constant-width Breit-Wigner resonance cross section is the simplest nonrelativistic curve; a P-wave scattering width and relativistic kinematics explain important expected distortions. A comparison to specific observed deviations cannot be made without the missing plot.
Write for the centre-of-mass frame kinetic energy, for the reduced mass, and for the relative wave number. The nonrelativistic relations areFor an isolated particle resonance of spin , averaging over the initial proton spin and using the zero pion spin givesFor the nearly elastic state, and , soFreezing at gives a symmetric Lorentzian centered at , with full width at half maximum and height . This is the local curve to sketch. If the displayed variable is the beam kinetic energy , its width is within this nonrelativistic approximation. Keeping changes the prefactor and hence the symmetry. Extending a constant-width approximation all the way to produces a spurious divergence, so it is not a valid threshold model.
The pion has intrinsic parity and the proton has . The positive parity and of the Delta baryon require odd orbital angular momentum, with the lowest choice . The finite-range partial-wave threshold law gives near threshold. Inserting this in the elastic numerator makes away from the pole as , rather than diverging. Equivalently the elastic scattering phase shift has , and . Away from threshold, form factors and other channels modify the simple cubic width.
At the illustrative peak of part (d), the incident pion kinetic energy is comparable to its rest energy, so a nonrelativistic pion treatment is already inaccurate. The exact relative momentum iswith . Relative to the symmetric local estimate, this changes the horizontal conversion, peak normalization and tails. The illustrative peak has , giving before small inelastic effects.
Finally, nonresonant partial waves can interfere with the resonant scattering amplitude, higher particle resonances and inelastic scattering channels can enter, and instrumental resolution can broaden a measured peak. These are physically distinct possible deviations; the missing data do not justify claiming any particular one was actually observed. Both the missing graphical overlay and its data-specific explanation remain source gaps.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.