False. Take the bounded measurable function
It tends to zero at positive infinity, but
Thus decay to zero alone does not imply Lebesgue integrability.
False. Let
This is a bounded measurable function, and the intervals are disjoint, so
Nevertheless for every positive integer , while . Hence it has no limit at infinity. Narrow spikes separate Lebesgue integrability from pointwise decay.
Set . By periodicity and countable additivity of the Lebesgue integral of a nonnegative function,
Thus is Lebesgue integrable for every .
Use the nonnegative-part convention , where and . The zero-mean assumption gives
For , write the integral over the th period as , where
Both and lie in the interval . Their difference therefore satisfies the stronger estimate
Consequently converges absolutely as a series of numbers, proving the requested limit of integrals over whole periods. This does not assert absolute integrability of the original function: the cancellation took place inside each period.
Indeed, setting , we have
The harmonic series diverges, so is Lebesgue integrable only if . Conversely means almost everywhere on one period, and hence on all periods, so almost everywhere. Therefore
This is an example of integrating a mean-zero periodic function divided by x.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.