Extend to be zero for . Define for and
Then the full-line equation is . Use the Fourier transform convention
Under the corresponding growth bounds, the positive-support transform is analytic above a horizontal line and the negative-support transform below a horizontal line. If both functions have suitable subexponential growth, the basic domains are respectively the upper and lower half-planes; exponential decay can enlarge these to overlapping strips. The convolution theorem gives .
The Wiener-Hopf method factors into functions analytic and nonzero in the respective domains. After multiplicative or additive separation, the two sides continue to one entire function, whose growth determines a polynomial by Liouville's theorem. Real-axis zeros must be assigned consistently with the inversion contour, rather than divided out without specifying a side.
For , direct integration gives , so
Rearrange the Wiener-Hopf factorization as
The left side has the positive-support analytic continuation and the right side the negative-support one. Their growth, from the supplied bounds, makes the common continued function a constant . Consequently
For this kernel, on the negative axis is a multiple of , so the latter transform is analytic for . The common strip can therefore be chosen as . In particular the inversion line must pass above both real poles of .
Set . Then
This is the transform, on , of
Equivalently, Fourier inversion closed below the inversion line for picks up the two real poles with clockwise orientation.
As a direct check, let . Since , the equation gives . At zero, differentiation of the integral gives , so ; this sets the sine and cosine coefficients equal. Direct substitution, or the transforms above, then verifies the full integral equation, not merely its differentiated form.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.