Past exam of the physics of atmospheres and oceans course of the University of Oxford / 2018 / 3 / d

The global mean absorbed solar flux is $L_{\infty }=0.8\times 584/4=116.8\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. Using $\sigma =5.6704\times 10^{-8}\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}{\mathrm{K}}^{-4}$ givesFor the requested graphical parcel estimate, start a dry adiabat at the warm ground, $T_{\mathrm{ad}}(z)=240.5-4.4z$ with $z$ in km, and intersect it with the radiative atmospheric profile $179.1[1+1.25e^{-z/10}{]}^{1/4}$. Solving givesThe original diagram below shows the intersection and the initial ground–air temperature discontinuity. A parcel heated towards the ground temperature remains buoyant until nearly one scale height in this model.

The atmospheric radiative lapse rate itself is only about $3.05\mathrm{K}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ at the bottom and decreases with height, smaller than the stated adiabatic $4.4\mathrm{K}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. Thus the interior radiative atmosphere is statically stable; the driver of this particular estimate is the hotter ground and discontinuity at the lower boundary, not a radiative lapse rate everywhere steeper than adiabatic. Convection would smooth that discontinuity and redistribute energy.

This is a diagnostic depth using the unadjusted radiative ground and atmospheric temperatures, not a fully energy-conserving radiative–convective equilibrium after adjustment. A self-consistent adjustment changes the surface temperature, infrared fluxes and boundary height. Mars also has spectral CO${}_2$ absorption, dust, day–night variation, seasonal changes and geographically uneven heating; a gray, horizontally averaged, constant-scale-height column with fixed lapse rate captures none of those details. The calculation indicates the possible importance of a deep surface-driven mixed layer under the stated assumptions, not a universal Martian boundary-layer measurement.