For every , is a sigma-algebra contained in , and including one more random variable among its generators can only enlarge it. Hence ; the trivial is contained in every sigma-algebra. These are exactly the requirements for a filtration.
The constant is -measurable. Suppose is -measurable. The pair is then -measurable, and the event is -measurable because comparison of two real coordinates defines a Borel set. Define its indicator function by . The recursion becomesIt is a measurable function of that pair. Mathematical induction proves is -measurable for every , so is an adapted process. The same recursion also proves at every finite time, a useful bound for the later integrability arguments.
Retain the binary random variables . Iterating the recursion givesEach binary history determines the full vector , so its sigma-algebra is finite by the sigma-algebra of a finite-valued random vector. Conversely, because , the integer uniquely determines the digits ; also . ThusAll binary histories have positive probability. By independence of the driving uniform random variables, along a fixed finite history every intermediate state is in , so each subsequent conditional branch probability, either or , is strictly positive. It follows that has nonempty fibres, each an atom of a sigma-algebra, and exactly elements.
Adaptedness from the preceding part gives . For , however, contains the events for every . They have distinct probabilities , so there are infinitely many distinct such events. Consequently the finite sigma-algebra cannot equal . The inclusion is strict for every .
The adapted process is bounded by , so every is an integrable random variable, indeed a square-integrable random variable. Independence of from and its continuous uniform distribution giveThis calculation with a random threshold is justified by conditioning on the -measurable value of : for a fixed , the Lebesgue integral equals . More formally, independence integrates the bounded Borel measurable function over its second coordinate. Thereforewhich verifies the martingale property for this filtration.
Since , the conditional expectation of the squared martingale difference isThe law of total expectation yields . In particular, for every .
The L2-bounded martingale convergence theorem states that a martingale with converges both almost surely and with convergence in L2 to a square-integrable random variable. Its hypotheses hold because . Thus there is almost surely with both kinds of convergence. Alternatively, the martingale convergence theorem gives the almost sure convergence, and the bound gives convergence in L2 by the dominated convergence theorem.[ref]
Probability: Theory and Examples (fifth edition) by Rick Durrett. §4.4, Theorem 4.4.6, printed p. 237: the Lp martingale convergence theorem
The calculation of the conditional expectation of the square is especially informative. The martingale property makes the cross term vanish in the square expansion, soSubtracting this from givesTaking expected values and iterating provesBy bounded convergence theorem, . The random variable inside this expected value is nonnegative, so it is zero almost surely; on this forces . Again by bounded convergence theorem, . HenceThis is the Bernoulli polarization martingale with update size . It also has an exact mean squared error: the terminal representation and the equality case for conditional second moments give
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.