Given , the next child takes a fresh uniform choice from , making uniform on . At zero the count stays zero. This conditional law depends only on the current count, so is a Markov chain.
The amounts taken do not generally retain that state information. For , compare two positive-probability histories with the same current value : if , exactly one sticker remains and ; if , none remains and . Thus the next amount depends on earlier history even after conditioning on the current amount, violating the Markov property.
The non-Markov assertion needs this nondegenerate range of . With the amount process is trivial; for it is also Markov if time-inhomogeneous transitions are permitted. The history counterexample establishes the intended failure for every .
The state space is . In this increasing ordering, the transition matrix is specified by
For each positive , the possible amounts taken correspond bijectively to the possible remaining counts. Each positive-state row therefore sums to one.
A state is a recurrent state if the probability of a return at some positive time, starting there, is one. It is a transient state if that return probability is less than one. It is an absorbing state if its one-step probability of remaining there is one. An absorbing state is recurrent, since every subsequent time is a return.
State zero is absorbing and recurrent. Every positive state is transient: after leaving it, the sticker count strictly decreases until reaching zero and can never return to that positive value. In fact absorption occurs after at most children who take a positive amount. Hence
Let be the expected number of future children receiving stickers from a box containing , with . Conditioning on the first uniform remainder gives
Subtract the corresponding identity for after multiplying each by its denominator. This gives , so . Therefore , and
The recurrence counts the current positive recipient once and excludes all later children arriving after the box is empty.
The remainder after the first child, , is uniform on . Given , the second child takes an average of stickers; when the amount is zero. Hence, for ,
The expression gives zero for , as expected.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.