We prove the stated Eisenstein criterion directly. Assume . Suppose in the polynomial ring . Since the principal ideal domain is an integral domain, polynomial degree is additive under polynomial multiplication, and the product of the leading coefficients of is the leading coefficient of . These two coefficients are therefore units. Multiplying and by inverse units, without changing their product, makes both factors monic polynomials.
If either factor is a constant polynomial, that factor is now , so the original factor was a unit. It remains to rule out and .
The prime element generates a maximal ideal in the principal ideal domain . Indeed, if , then , and the irreducible element property of forces either or . Consequently is a field. Apply reduction modulo an ideal to every coefficient. The monic polynomial factors retain their polynomial degrees, and the hypotheses give
The polynomial ring over a field is a unique factorization domain, and is an irreducible polynomial. Thus its only monic polynomial divisors in are powers of . Hence and . Both have zero constant term, so and . This gives , a contradiction.
The monic polynomial has positive polynomial degree, so it is a nonzero nonunit. Every factorization therefore has a unit factor, proving
Regard as the polynomial ring . The coefficient ring is a Euclidean domain, hence a principal ideal domain. The element is a prime element: the quotient ring is an integral domain.
The monic polynomial has its other coefficients divisible by , while . Part (a)(i), with playing the role of and the indeterminate, proves that is an irreducible polynomial.
Now use the automorphism of a polynomial ring
Its inverse fixes and sends to . A ring isomorphism preserves units and factorizations, hence preserves irreducible elements. Since
we obtain
Applying the Eisenstein criterion directly to the second expression with the prime element would fail, since ; the change of indeterminate supplies the required argument.
All principal ideals in this part are taken inside the subring , rather than inside . First, is a subring: sums and additive inverses retain zero coefficient of , and the coefficient of in a product is . It contains .
The principal ideal is precisely
Indeed, multiplying an element of by gives a possible term of polynomial degree and terms of polynomial degrees at least , with no term. Conversely, dividing any displayed polynomial by gives a polynomial with no term, hence an element of .
Given , let be its coefficients of , respectively. Subtracting these terms leaves an element of , so
For uniqueness, if two such representatives differ by an element of , their difference has possible monomials only , whereas every element of has zero coefficients at all three. Comparing coefficients gives , , .
In particular, . Treating as the principal ideal of instead would incorrectly discard this surviving term.
Set and . Part (b)(i) gives a unique representative for each element of the quotient ring . By polynomial division, each element of the quotient ring likewise has a unique representative . Thus the proposed map is well-defined and a bijection.
It preserves addition and . To verify multiplication, all terms of polynomial degree at least lie in . Hence
In the other quotient ring, , giving exactly the same coefficient formula:
Therefore
is a ring isomorphism. Both sides are examples of a truncated polynomial ring; the generator on the left is the class of , whose square is nonzero and whose cube vanishes.
No such property exists. The ring isomorphism in part (b)(ii) identifies quotient rings by elements having different irreducible element behaviour.
The element is an irreducible element of . It is nonzero and a nonunit. Every nonzero nonunit of has polynomial degree at least : the only possible polynomials of smaller polynomial degree are constant polynomials, and every nonzero constant polynomial is a unit. If with both nonunits, additivity of polynomial degree in the integral domain would give
which is impossible. Thus one factor must be a unit.
In , however, is a product of two nonunits, so is not an irreducible element. If a ring isomorphism invariant characterized irreducible elements by the indicated quotient ring, the irreducible element would imply that has . Its isomorphic quotient ring would then have , incorrectly making an irreducible element.
Consequently,
The required property is
For a nonzero element of an integral domain , this follows from
Indeed, in the quotient ring exactly when . The prime element condition says this forces or , exactly the absence of zero divisors in the quotient ring. The nonunit condition makes the quotient ring nonzero. Being an integral domain is preserved by every ring isomorphism.
With the usual definition of a prime element, is understood. The prime ideal formulation works for every ideal of any commutative ring, including the zero ideal; it avoids this convention about elements.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.