Let be upper triangular matrices. For an entry below the diagonal, , matrix multiplication gives
If , then . If , then , so . Every summand is zero, giving
Thus is an upper triangular matrix. Equivalently, a potentially nonzero summand would require , impossible below the diagonal.
Suppose an invertible matrix has two LU factorizations, , with unit lower triangular matrices and upper triangular matrices. All four factors are invertible matrices, since their square products are invertible. Multiplication by the appropriate inverse matrices gives
By the supplied closure properties, the left side is a unit lower triangular matrix and the right side is an upper triangular matrix. A matrix of both types is diagonal; its diagonal entries are all one. Thus both sides are the identity matrix, whence
Qualification of the printed wording: this establishes uniqueness if the specified LU factorization exists. Invertibility alone does not guarantee an unpivoted LU factorization. For example is invertible, but in a product , the zero top-left entry forces , making the bottom-left entry as well, contrary to the required value one. A permutation matrix is needed in general, as in PLU factorization.
Use Gaussian elimination without row exchanges. First apply and ; then apply :
The elimination multipliers are , and . Put them below the diagonal of a unit lower triangular matrix:
To see why these multipliers reconstruct the rows, row 2 of is three times row 1 of plus row 2 of , giving . Row 3 of is twice row 1 plus row 2 plus row 3 of , giving . This directly verifies the LU factorization.
The elementary row operations used above add multiples of other rows, so preserve the determinant. The determinant of an upper triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries. Hence
Equivalently, and multiplicativity of the determinant gives .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.