Markov's inequality: if and , then . Pointwise,
Taking expected values, using their monotonicity and the identity , gives . Division by the positive threshold proves the inequality. If the expectation is infinite, the extended-valued bound remains true but uninformative.
**Chebyshev's inequality: if has finite mean and variance , then for ,
Apply Markov's inequality to the nonnegative random variable with threshold . Since and , the desired statement follows immediately.
By linearity of expectation, . Expanding the square and again using linearity of expectation gives
Here the zero means imply and . The covariance expansion itself does not require independence. Under the additional independence stated here, , so it simplifies further to .
Write the card values as . Uniform selection gives
Thus and , by the variance identity .
Every particular card is second with probability
Hence and have the same distribution, with means zero and variances one. They are not independent, since a card cannot be drawn twice.
Every ordered pair of distinct cards has probability . Therefore
This negative covariance is the effect of sampling without replacement, not a contradiction of their identical marginals.
Represent the removed half as the first cards in a uniformly random ordering. Every unordered half is then equally likely. Let be their values. Each has mean zero and variance one, and every distinct pair has covariance by the same ordered-pair argument as in (ii).
The general covariance expansion from (b), applied without imposing independence, gives
This is the finite population correction for a half-sample; treating the draws as independent would give the wrong variance.
Finally , so Chebyshev's inequality yields
The cards returned before this sampling step restore the original population; no conditioning on the earlier two observed values is imposed.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.