Lipschitz domain 2026-10-05
A Lipschitz domain is an open connected subset of Euclidean space whose boundary is locally the graph of a Lipschitz continuous function after rotating and translating coordinates. Locally the domain lies on one side of that graph. This permits corners but excludes boundary cusps that cannot be represented with a finite Lipschitz constant. Bounded Lipschitz domains are a standard setting for Sobolev spaces and the Poincaré inequality for total variation.
On a bounded connected Lipschitz domain, let belong to the BV space, and let be a positivity-preserving operator with . Writing , , the triangle inequality and Poincaré inequality for total variation give . Thus forward-image and variation bounds control the missing constant mode, and hence the full norm.
On a bounded domain of positive measure, the constant functions satisfy while . Thus the total variation seminorm on a domain is neither coercive in the norm nor strictly convex. Additional control of the mean can remove this obstruction; the Poincaré inequality for total variation supplies the needed bound on suitable connected domains.
Positivity means almost everywhere, since the real logarithm must belong to . A positivity-preserving operator gives . For fixed , the scalar shifted Poisson data fidelity is , with
Composition with the linear operator proves convexity in , and strict convexity holds along pairs whose forward images differ on a set of positive measure. The admissible class itself is convex: the concavity of the logarithm gives , controlling its negative part, while controls its positive part.
Because and , the Jensen inequality gives the requested bound:
The final equality uses nonnegativity and the unit area. Since , this controls the forward-image norm on energy sublevels.
The printed strictly positive problem has no minimizer. This is nonattainment under strict positivity for shifted Poisson fidelity, rather than a failure of the coercivity calculation. Indeed, with and , implies . Also cannot vanish identically for a strictly positive . To see this, let . If , positivity and give . But in and continuity of would imply , contradicting the hypothesis. Thus every admissible has positive fidelity and hence positive total energy.
Conversely, the constants are admissible, have zero total variation, and satisfy
Their logarithms are integrable for each , but the limit is excluded. Therefore
A bounded minimizing sequence and bounded-variation compactness do not repair a nonclosed positivity/logarithm constraint. In particular, a literal existence or uniqueness proof for that domain is impossible.
The natural correction is to minimize over with , omitting the unnecessary condition: the fidelity only contains , which is already integrable. Here is the full existence for nonnegative shifted Poisson regularization argument, also valid for any bounded nonnegative data . Let , , and take a minimizing sequence of energy at most . The displayed bound gives and . Write . The Poincaré inequality for total variation and mean control for positive imaging operators yield
The denominator is nonzero, so the full norm is bounded. Bounded-variation compactness gives in along a subsequence, with . Continuity gives in . On , , so the fidelity converges in the integral; lower semicontinuity of variation completes the direct method in the calculus of variations.
For the actual printed data , the corrected problem has the unique minimizer , even if is not injective. Zero attains energy zero. Any other zero-energy candidate would have both and ; on the connected square, zero variation makes a nonnegative constant, and forces that constant to vanish. For general positive bounded data, an injective is a sufficient uniqueness condition, because its fidelity is strictly convex; injectivity is not a necessary condition in every instance.
In the finite-dimensional interpretation, let . Independent Poisson observations with these intensities have negative log-likelihood . Removing the constant gives precisely the stated fidelity. Thus the model is Poisson counting noise with a unit background intensity, or an approximate version of it for rescaled/continuous grey values. Literal Poisson counts are integers; the constraint is a grey-value normalization, not a literal unscaled count sample.
For , its total variation seminorm on a domain is
The corresponding bounded-variation space and its zero-mean subspace are
If , the Poincaré inequality for total variation is
In particular, for .
Zero-mean bounded-variation space Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-10-05
The zero-mean bounded-variation space is
On a bounded connected Lipschitz domain, removing the constant nullspace makes total variation coercive on this subspace by the Poincaré inequality for total variation.