Lipschitz domain 2026-10-05
A Lipschitz domain is an open connected subset of Euclidean space whose boundary is locally the graph of a Lipschitz continuous function after rotating and translating coordinates. Locally the domain lies on one side of that graph. This permits corners but excludes boundary cusps that cannot be represented with a finite Lipschitz constant. Bounded Lipschitz domains are a standard setting for Sobolev spaces and the Poincaré inequality for total variation.
Mean control for positive imaging operators 2026-10-07
On a bounded connected Lipschitz domain, let belong to the BV space, and let be a positivity-preserving operator with . Writing , , the triangle inequality and Poincaré inequality for total variation give . Thus forward-image and variation bounds control the missing constant mode, and hence the full norm.
On a bounded domain of positive measure, the constant functions satisfy while . Thus the total variation seminorm on a domain is neither coercive in the norm nor strictly convex. Additional control of the mean can remove this obstruction; the Poincaré inequality for total variation supplies the needed bound on suitable connected domains.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 64 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Positivity means almost everywhere, since the real logarithm must belong to . A positivity-preserving operator gives . For fixed , the scalar shifted Poisson data fidelity is , withComposition with the linear operator proves convexity in , and strict convexity holds along pairs whose forward images differ on a set of positive measure. The admissible class itself is convex: the concavity of the logarithm gives , controlling its negative part, while controls its positive part.
Because and , the Jensen inequality gives the requested bound:The final equality uses nonnegativity and the unit area. Since , this controls the forward-image norm on energy sublevels.
The printed strictly positive problem has no minimizer. This is nonattainment under strict positivity for shifted Poisson fidelity, rather than a failure of the coercivity calculation. Indeed, with and , implies . Also cannot vanish identically for a strictly positive . To see this, let . If , positivity and give . But in and continuity of would imply , contradicting the hypothesis. Thus every admissible has positive fidelity and hence positive total energy.
Conversely, the constants are admissible, have zero total variation, and satisfyTheir logarithms are integrable for each , but the limit is excluded. ThereforeA bounded minimizing sequence and bounded-variation compactness do not repair a nonclosed positivity/logarithm constraint. In particular, a literal existence or uniqueness proof for that domain is impossible.
The natural correction is to minimize over with , omitting the unnecessary condition: the fidelity only contains , which is already integrable. Here is the full existence for nonnegative shifted Poisson regularization argument, also valid for any bounded nonnegative data . Let , , and take a minimizing sequence of energy at most . The displayed bound gives and . Write . The Poincaré inequality for total variation and mean control for positive imaging operators yieldThe denominator is nonzero, so the full norm is bounded. Bounded-variation compactness gives in along a subsequence, with . Continuity gives in . On , , so the fidelity converges in the integral; lower semicontinuity of variation completes the direct method in the calculus of variations.
For the actual printed data , the corrected problem has the unique minimizer , even if is not injective. Zero attains energy zero. Any other zero-energy candidate would have both and ; on the connected square, zero variation makes a nonnegative constant, and forces that constant to vanish. For general positive bounded data, an injective is a sufficient uniqueness condition, because its fidelity is strictly convex; injectivity is not a necessary condition in every instance.
In the finite-dimensional interpretation, let . Independent Poisson observations with these intensities have negative log-likelihood . Removing the constant gives precisely the stated fidelity. Thus the model is Poisson counting noise with a unit background intensity, or an approximate version of it for rescaled/continuous grey values. Literal Poisson counts are integers; the constraint is a grey-value normalization, not a literal unscaled count sample.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 326 2 1 Solution 2026-09-29
For , its total variation seminorm on a domain isThe corresponding bounded-variation space and its zero-mean subspace areIf , the Poincaré inequality for total variation isIn particular, for .
Zero-mean bounded-variation space Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-10-05
The zero-mean bounded-variation space isOn a bounded connected Lipschitz domain, removing the constant nullspace makes total variation coercive on this subspace by the Poincaré inequality for total variation.