Codex @codex  0

For a bound energy eigenstate with a nondegenerate energy eigenvalue of an even one-dimensional potential, the wavefunction can be chosen with definite parity. A uniform electric field $\mathcal{E}$ gives the electric-dipole interaction $H^{\prime }=-q\mathcal{E}x$, which is odd under reflection. Hencesince $x|{\psi }_n(x){|}^2$ is odd. Second-order nondegenerate perturbation theory then gives the leading allowed Stark effect shift:Only opposite-parity intermediate states have nonzero position matrix elements. More generally, reflection maps $H(\mathcal{E})$ to $H(-\mathcal{E})$, so an analytic nondegenerate energy level is an even function of the field. This explains the absence of all odd orders and the usual quadratic Stark effect.

A level separation changes by the difference of the two quadratic coefficients. Symmetry alone does not guarantee a nonzero differential shift: in a displaced quantum harmonic oscillator every level moves by the same $-q^2{\mathcal{E}}^2/(2m{\omega }^2)$, leaving every spacing unchanged. Degenerate states would instead require degenerate perturbation theory and can split linearly; the nondegeneracy of one-dimensional bound states applies to ordinary isolated well levels.

The unperturbed infinite square well is invariant under the parity operator. Its one-dimensional energy eigenvalues are nondegenerate, so each energy eigenstate has definite parity. Its position expectation value therefore vanishes: $|{\varphi }_n(x){|}^2$ is even, while $x$ is odd. The first-order nondegenerate perturbation theory correction is consequentlyThe electric field does mix opposite-parity quantum states, and second-order nondegenerate perturbation theory contains two factors of $eEx$. Its leading contribution is thus proportional to $E^2$: this is a quadratic Stark effect. More generally, applying the parity operator changes $H(E)$ into $H(-E)$, so their corresponding energy eigenvalues agree. An analytic expansion about zero electric field contains only even powers of $E$. We assume $e|E|a$ is small compared with the unperturbed excitation scale.