Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 310 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Insert the component-density laws into the Friedmann equation, using and . Multiplying by givesThe radiation in cosmology and pressureless matter contributions add; the printed first formula has lost the plus sign between them. In the Friedmann acceleration equation, , soEvaluating the first equation today gives .
Now remove dark energy and assume a positive pressureless matter or radiation in cosmology density, starting on an expanding branch. Let . It decreases from infinity to zero, and , while . This immediately distinguishes all three cases of spatial curvature of an FLRW universe.
- Closed, . There is a unique maximum size with . Expansion from a Big Bang slows to and then becomes contraction, ending in a Big Crunch. The turning point is reached in finite time because has a simple zero there. The acceleration remains negative at the maximum, so it is a recollapse rather than a static state.
- Open, . The expanding solution never stops because . It expands forever, eventually approaching a curvature-dominated universe with and . Locally its late-time behavior approaches the empty Milne universe.
- Spatially flat, . Expansion also continues forever, but instead of approaching a nonzero constant. With pressureless matter present, the late-time solution has , the Einstein-de Sitter universe behavior; a flat solution containing only radiation in cosmology has . With both components, an early radiation domination era gives way to matter domination.
The early small- solution has if radiation in cosmology is present, and for pressureless matter alone. The figure isolates the effect of curvature in three matter-only examples, rather than comparing models with the same present density parameters.
Matter-only scale-factor evolution: closed recollapse, flat power-law expansion, and open expansion tending to a constant speed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 310 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Consider a species in thermal equilibrium, with energy density and pressure depending on temperature and with vanishing chemical potential, as in the supplied thermodynamic relation. Put . The first law of thermodynamics givesSince ,The differential is therefore exact:After fixing the irrelevant additive entropy zero, the entropy density at zero chemical potential isMore precisely the first law leaves an additive constant in ; extensivity fixes that constant for the usual entropy-density normalization. A nonzero chemical potential would instead require , so the stated formula is not a universal identity for a decoupled massive species with conserved particle number.
For a reversible thermodynamic process that is an adiabatic process in a comoving volume, and the cosmological perfect-fluid continuity equation gives . Differentiating the extensive expression explicitly, or using the exact differential above, givesThis is cosmological entropy conservation for the closed equilibrium gas with no entropy-producing energy injection.
For radiation in cosmology, , so . Comparing and yields the coefficient ratioWhen all relativistic species share the same temperature and count, the familiar normalizations are and . More generally the energy and entropy effective counts can differ; the common here uses the assumptions stated in the question.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 310 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Put with . Linearizing the cosmological density parameter flow gives . For constant equation-of-state parameter,For variable , the correct replacement is . The printed power assumes constant .
For pressureless matter, the departure from flatness grows as ; for radiation in cosmology, it grows as . Hence in a conventional decelerating expanding history, maintaining at a late epoch requires extremely small departures at early times. This is the Flatness problem, not an assertion that exact flatness is inconsistent: is an exact solution, but it is unstable to small departures in spatial curvature of an FLRW universe during these eras. With the perturbation instead decays, which supplies the inflationary solution of the flatness problem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 310 2 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Normalize the scale factor so that . With separately conserved pressureless matter and radiation in cosmology, their energy densities scale as and . Hence the flat Friedmann equation isEquality of the two densities defines matter-radiation equality, with . Define the dimensionless variableSubstituting givesBoth reference density fractions are positive. In the two-component flat model their sum at the reference epoch is one; no dark-energy component is being included in this background calculation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 310 2 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Relativistic pressure gives the radiation fluid a sound speed . Well inside the sound horizon, , radiation linear cosmological density perturbations undergo rapid pressure-supported oscillations instead of sustained gravitational growth. Their potential decays. For an ideal radiation fluid with negligible scalar anisotropic stress, the regular Newtonian gauge in cosmology solution during radiation domination illustrates this explicitly:For its amplitude is . Thus radiation in cosmology remains essential to the background Friedmann equation, while its rapidly oscillating gravitational forcing can be smoothed out when following the slowly varying cold dark matter density mode. This is the approximation behind the Mészáros equation.
The important limitation is that “subhorizon” alone is not a pointwise theorem that . Radiation can dominate the instantaneous potential during early radiation domination, and the forcing near horizon entry seeds the later logarithmic matter mode. We neglect that transient and rapidly oscillating forcing in the subsequent coarse-grained growth equation, not radiation's contribution to the expansion rate. Close to horizon entry, or for accurate oscillatory evolution, the coupled radiation and matter perturbation equations must be retained. For the slow matter potential, the metric time derivatives in part (a) are also suppressed relative to its spatial Laplacian by . The approximation smooths radiation perturbations while retaining radiation in cosmology in the background cosmic expansion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 310 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Normalize the present scale factor to . In a flat universe containing radiation in cosmology, pressureless matter, and a cosmological constant, the Friedmann equation iswhere . Since , the age of an FLRW universe isFor a matter-only flat Einstein-de Sitter universe,Taking the present value , for which the Hubble time is , gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 1 15D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Take a fixed comoving region, whose physical volume is . Its energy is , so the first-law relation givesDifferentiating with respect to cosmic time and using the Hubble parameter yields the cosmological perfect-fluid continuity equation
For the barotropic equation of state , separation gives the constant-equation-of-state density scalingSubstituting this into the flat Friedmann equation and integrating the expanding branch gives, for ,For , the density and Hubble parameter are constant and instead .
Conformal time is defined byAt radiation–string equality, let each component have density at . Since radiation in cosmology has and a cosmic string network has ,ConsequentlyThusOn the expanding branch, integration givesChoosing the Big Bang to occur at gives the radiation--cosmic-string Friedmann solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 310 2 e Solution 2026-09-28
The matter-like scaling is special to a quadratic minimum. More generally, the effective equation of state of an oscillating scalar field in isFor example, a quartic minimum has and redshifts like radiation in cosmology. Potentials without a stable minimum, oscillations whose period is not short relative to the Hubble time, and significant decay of the inflaton into other particles also invalidate the matter-like argument.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 310 3 a Solution 2026-09-28
For radiation in cosmology, and , so both terms proportional to the equation-of-state difference vanish. During matter domination the gravitational potential is constant, . Writing , the continuity and Euler equations reduce toDifferentiate the first equation and substitute the second:Thus the radiation perturbation obeys the forced acoustic equation
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ii Paper 1 15B b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Separate continuity givesusing the scalings for radiation in cosmology and cosmological constant energy. At , where , the Friedmann equation becomessoAt general ,which rearranges to
Radiation--cosmic-string Friedmann solution Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-10-05
Consider a spatially flat universe containing radiation and a cosmic string network. If their densities are both at scale factor , thenIn conformal time , the flat Friedmann equation becomesChoosing the Big Bang at , its expanding solution is
Radiation-matter scale factor in conformal time Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-07
In a flat universe containing separately conserved radiation in cosmology and pressureless matter, the Friedmann equation becomes in conformal time. Setting at gives the stated quadratic-plus-linear scale factor. The linear term controls radiation domination and the quadratic term controls matter domination. The formula presumes , and no cosmological constant.
For radiation in cosmology with zero cosmological constant, . The Friedmann acceleration equation gives , so the deceleration parameter equals the cosmological density parameter, regardless of spatial curvature. This is a relation for a pure radiation fluid, not a general identity for a mixture.
