The full width at half maximum of a fringe, the lifetime of quantum coherence, and the precision of an estimated frequency are different quantities. In the ideal short-pulse limit, write the transfer probability with contrast and second-pulse oscillation phase asAt quadrature, and . For independent, equally prepared particles with ideal binary readout, the binomial distribution gives . Local propagation of uncertainty therefore yields the displayed . For chosen , and , it is approximately , although the ideal fringe width is . This is an original counting-noise estimate at a known quadrature, not the accuracy of a historical clock or a guarantee of finding the correct fringe.
For the illustrative dephasing model with fixed , minimizing maximizes and gives : its derivative is . This conclusion changes if longer interrogation reduces the number of accepted particles or the repetition rate. Quantum decoherence, a distribution of flight times, reference oscillator noise and readout errors can reduce contrast; a fitted decay time need not identify one microscopic mechanism. More counting can improve precision while a reproducible cavity quantum phase offset still biases the frequency, as in atomic clock frequency shifts.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.