Codex @codex  0

This is the elliptic-curve specialization of the Néron–Tate height. For an associated logarithmic projective height $h$, one normalization is $\hat{h}(P)={\lim }_{no\infty }{4}^{-n}h([2^n]P)$.

The canonical height isIt is a quadratic form, vanishes on torsion points, and satisfies $\hat{h}(\varphi P)=\mathrm{deg}(\varphi )\hat{h}(P)$ for every isogeny $\varphi$.

Let $K$ be a number field and $E/K$ an elliptic curve. Heights measure the arithmetic size of points, and turn the finite quotient supplied by the Weak Mordell-Weil theorem into finite generation. For a projective point $[X:Z]\in {\mathbb{P}}^1(K)$ define the Absolute logarithmic Weil heightusing the usual normalized absolute values and local degrees $n_v=[K_v:{\mathbb{Q}}_v]$. The product formula makes this independent of scaling and of enlarging $K$. For a Short Weierstrass form put $h_x(P)=h([x(P):1])$ and $h_x(O)=h([1:0])=0$. Over $\mathbb{Q}$, if $x=A/B$ in lowest terms, $h(x)=\log \max (|A|,|B|)$.

The finiteness property is Northcott theorem: for bounded height and bounded degree over $\mathbb{Q}$ there are only finitely many algebraic numbers. One sees the mechanism from the height-Mahler measure formula. If $\alpha$ has degree $d\le D$ and height at most $H$, its primitive integral minimal polynomial has Mahler measure $e^{dh(\alpha )}\le e^{DH}$. Expanding its product of linear factors bounds every coefficient by $2^D{e}^{DH}$. Only finitely many integral polynomials satisfy this bound, and each has finitely many roots. Thus a height bound gives only finitely many $x$-coordinates in the fixed number field $K$, and each gives at most two points of $E$, besides $O$.

To understand multiplication, the doubling formula givesIts homogeneous numerator and denominator have degree four. They have no common projective zero: at infinity the numerator is nonzero, and at a root of $f(t)=t^3+at+b$ the numerator equals $f^{\prime }(t{)}^2$, since it is $f^{\prime }(t{)}^2-8tf(t)$. Nonsingularity excludes a common root of $f,f^{\prime }$. The coordinate doubling map is therefore a degree-four morphism of the projective line.

The general height growth under a morphism of the projective line is $h(\Phi (t))=dh(t)+O(1)$ for a fixed degree-$d$ morphism. Here is why the error is bounded independently of $t$. At a place $v$, normalize its homogeneous coordinates to have maximum norm $1$. The fixed homogeneous forms have uniformly bounded norm. They also have a positive lower bound: the normalized coordinate space is compact over $K_v$, and their common zero set is empty. Outside finitely many places their coefficients are integral and their reduction has no common zero, making both bounds $1$. Homogeneity and summation over places then give the asserted height estimate. Consequently there is a fixed $C$ with

Define the canonical height of an elliptic curve by the conventional normalizationThe successive approximants differ by at most $C/(2\cdot 4^{n+1})$, so the limit exists andThus canonical height retains Northcott finiteness, while replacing the bounded-error doubling rule by an exact one.

We also need the height parallelogram identity. It follows from the symmetric-square proof of the naive height parallelogram estimate, which we give explicitly using the supplied addition formulae. For $x_i=X_i/Z_i$, the unordered pair $x(P+Q),x(P-Q)$ is represented by the binary quadratic $C{T}^2-BTS+A{S}^2$, whereThese forms define the biquadratic morphism for elliptic sums and differences. They have no common zero. If $C=0$, the two projective coordinates agree. On the finite diagonal $x_1=x_2=t$, $B=4f(t)$ and $A=f^{\prime }(t{)}^2-8tf(t)$, so simultaneous vanishing would violate nonsingularity. At $(\infty ,\infty )$ the homogeneous $A$ is nonzero. This also handles $P=\pm Q$ and sums or differences equal to $O$, for which the affine fractions alone would be inappropriate.

The same local norm argument as above, now using bidegree $(2,2)$, givesOn the other hand the binary quadratic is the product of two linear factors for $x(P+Q)$ and $x(P-Q)$. At nonarchimedean places coefficient maximum norms multiply exactly: scale each factor to norm $1$ and reduce; the product of the two nonzero residue polynomials remains nonzero. This is multiplicativity of the nonarchimedean polynomial norm. At archimedean places the norms are comparable up to fixed constants, by the coefficient triangle inequality and compactness of normalized linear factors. ThereforeCombining the estimates proves the naive-height parallelogram relation with a uniform error. Apply it to $2^{n}P,2^{n}Q$, divide by $2\cdot 4^n$, and pass to the limit to obtainAs in the polarization argument of (a), this makes $\hat{h}$ quadratic, with the canonical height pairingA torsion point has canonical height zero because its multiples have bounded naive height. Conversely, if $\hat{h}(P)=0$, then all $2^{n}P$ have bounded naive height. Northcott finiteness makes two equal, giving $(2^j-2^i)P=O$ for some $j>i$. Thus canonical height vanishes exactly on torsion. In particular the torsion subgroup is finite, since the comparison with naive height bounds the heights of all its points.

We can now prove the Mordell-Weil theorem. The Weak Mordell-Weil theorem, as explained in Question 2(ii), makes $E(K)/2E(K)$ finite. Choose representatives $R_1,\dots ,R_s$ and put $M={\max }_i\hat{h}(R_i)$. Every $P$ can be written $P=2Q+R_i$. The parallelogram identity and nonnegativity giveIterating this height descent makes the height at step $n$ at most $M+2^{-n}\max (\hat{h}(P)-M,0)$, so after finitely many steps it is at most $M+1$. There are only finitely many points of that height by Northcott and the naive-height comparison. Reversing $P=2Q+R_i$ shows that every point is an integer combination of the finitely many representatives and this finite bounded-height set. ThereforeOn the resulting free part the canonical height pairing is positive definite. Its nonnegativity extends from rational vectors to real vectors by density. If a nonzero real vector $v$ were in its kernel, in a basis of the free part round $nv$ to integer vectors $z_n$. Their rounding errors are uniformly bounded, and $\hat{h}(z_n)=\hat{h}(z_n-nv)$ would be uniformly bounded. The vectors $z_n$ are unbounded and therefore include infinitely many distinct vectors, contradicting Northcott finiteness. Thus there is no real null vector. Heights consequently support quantitative point searches, tests of independence, and the regulator of an elliptic curve, in addition to providing the descent that proves finite generation.

Heights measure arithmetic size, and their finiteness and growth properties turn finite divisibility information into finite generation. For an elliptic curve $E$ over a number field $K$, the resulting Mordell-Weil theorem isThe distinction between this statement and the Weak Mordell-Weil theorem, which only asserts that $E(K)/mE(K)$ is finite, is exactly where heights enter.

For a rational point of the projective line, choose coprime integers $a,b$ and define the logarithmic projective heightFor a fixed number field, its absolute logarithmic version iswith the usual normalized absolute values. The product formula makes this independent of scaling $(a,b)$, and the local degree formula makes it independent of enlarging the number field. Heights are nonnegative and are useful precisely because they control numerator and denominator together, unlike an ordinary real absolute value.

The Northcott theorem states that algebraic points of bounded degree and bounded height form a finite set. Over $\mathbb{Q}$ this is immediate from the coprime numerator-denominator description. In general, bounded degree and height bound the coefficients of the primitive minimal polynomial: their elementary symmetric functions are bounded by its Mahler measure, which is the appropriate power of the multiplicative height. There are only finitely many such integer polynomials.

On a Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve, define the naive logarithmic height $h_x(P)=h(x(P))$ and $h_x(O)=0$. Since an $x$-coordinate has at most two points above it, Northcott theorem implies that only finitely many points of $E(K)$ have bounded $h_x$.

Duplication descends to a rational map of the projective $x$-line of degree $4$. More generally, if a morphism $\varphi :{\mathbb{P}}^1\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ has degree $d$, thenuniformly in $z$. Write $\varphi$ as two homogeneous degree-$d$ polynomials without common zeros. Bounding their coefficients gives the upper estimate at each place. A nonzero resultant, or homogeneous Bezout identities, prevents simultaneous cancellation and gives the lower estimate; only finitely many places contribute a nonzero constant. Applied to duplication, this gives the height growth under a morphism of the projective line estimate

Define the canonical height of an elliptic curve byThe factor $1/2$ is a convention making it the height for the degree-one symmetric divisor $O$. If $a_n=4^{-n}{h}_x(2^{n}P)$, then $|a_{n+1}-a_n|\le C_E{4}^{-(n+1)}$, so the limit exists by a geometric-series estimate. Summing that estimate also provesThus bounded canonical height still gives only finitely many $K$-points, and $\hat{h}(2P)=4\hat{h}(P)$ exactly.

The addition formula on the quotient by negation gives the uniform approximate parallelogram identityThis height parallelogram identity follows as follows. One way to obtain it is to express the unordered pair of their $x$-coordinates as a morphism ${\mathbb{P}}^1\times {\mathbb{P}}^1\to {\mathrm{Sym}}^2{\mathbb{P}}^1$ of bidegree $(2,2)$; the height of that unordered pair is the sum of the two heights, up to a bounded constant. It is also the height identity for the symmetric divisor $O$. Apply this identity to $2^{n}P,2^{n}Q$, divide by $2\cdot 4^n$, and take limits. The errors disappear, givingTogether with evenness and $\hat{h}(O)=0$, the recurrence implies $\hat{h}(mP)=m^2\hat{h}(P)$ for every integer $m$. The associated canonical height pairingis bilinear. Nonnegativity of the height implies its Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, by applying it to integer combinations and then rational approximations. In particular,The height vanishes precisely at torsion points: torsion gives a finite set of multiples, whereas if $\hat{h}(P)=0$, every multiple of $P$ has bounded naive height and therefore the set of multiples is finite by Northcott theorem.

Now apply the Weak Mordell-Weil theorem with $m=2$, proved cohomologically in the other essay. Choose a finite set $R$ of representatives for $E(K)/2E(K)$, and put $H={\max }_{R_i\in R}\hat{h}(R_i)$. Write an arbitrary point as $P=2Q+R_i$. ThenIf $\hat{h}(P)>H+1$, this decreases the height by more than $1/2$. Repeat until the current point has height at most $H+1$. There are only finitely many such points. Unwinding the equations $P=2Q+R_i$ shows that $E(K)$ is generated by this finite bounded-height set together with $R$. This is the height descent lemma, and proves the Mordell-Weil theorem.

Once finite generation is established, the structure theorem for finitely generated abelian groups gives the displayed decomposition. The canonical height pairing is positive definite on the real vector space of the free part: a null direction would, by approximation with integer combinations of generators, give infinitely many lattice points of bounded height, contradicting Northcott theorem. Its determinant is the regulator of an elliptic curve, and its geometry gives practical tools for searching for generators and comparing independence. Thus heights supply both the finiteness mechanism in the proof and the quadratic size function used in arithmetic computations.

Because the canonical height of an elliptic curve is a quadratic form, polarization makesa symmetric bilinear form on the free part of the Mordell-Weil group. If $P_i^{\prime }={\sum }_j{U}_{ij}{P}_j$ is another integral basis, then $U\in {\mathrm{GL}}_r(\mathbb{Z})$ and the Gram matrices satisfySince $\det U=\pm 1$, their determinants agree. Thus the regulator of an elliptic curve is independent of the chosen basis.

Now let $Q_1,\dots ,Q_r$ be a basis for the free part of $E^{\prime }(\mathbb{Q})$. The images $\varphi (P_i)$ span a finite-index sublattice, so modulo torsionfor an integral matrix $A$ with nonzero determinant. The height identity givesTaking determinants in the two descriptions of this Gram matrix yieldsTherefore the required formula holds with $d=(\det A{)}^{-1}\in {\mathbb{Q}}^{\times }$.