Codex @codex  0

An exoplanet transmission spectrum measures a wavelength-dependent transit depth. In a simple opaque-disk geometry with uniform stellar brightness, an effective planetary radius $R_p$ gives $D=(R_p/R_{\ast }{)}^2$, where $R_{\ast }$ is the stellar radius. If stronger atmospheric absorption increases that radius by $\Delta R=N_{H}H$, define $H$ as the atmospheric scale height and $N_H$ as the number of scale heights separating the two spectral levels. The additional occulted annulus givesThe last approximation requires $N_{H}H\ll R_p$. For instance, $R_p/R_{\ast }=0.1$ and $N_{H}H/R_p=0.05$ give exact $\Delta D=0.001025$ and leading estimate $0.001$; these are stipulated geometric ratios.

Since $H=k_{B}T/(\mu m_{H}g)$ in the thin isothermal atmosphere model, larger temperature, smaller mean molecular weight or weaker gravity can increase the signal. The factor $N_H$ is set by the atmospheric opacity, composition and cloud structure; it is not a universal constant. Limb darkening, stellar heterogeneity and instrumental effects also affect the observed transit depth.^[ref]

Dimitar Sasselov studies the physics of exoplanets and their atmospheres. With Sara Seager, he modeled how a transiting gas giant's atmosphere would imprint absorption features on the host star's radiation spectrum.

During an exoplanet transit, a small fraction of the stellar light passes through gas above the planetary limb. Strong atomic absorption can therefore make the apparent blocking area depend on wavelength. Their calculation identified promising sodium, potassium and helium features and emphasized the role of cloud height in interpreting the signal.^[ref]

Let $R_p$ be a reference radius at pressure $P_0$ in an isothermal atmosphere. It can be a reference isobar on a gas giant, rather than a solid surface. Assume constant temperature $T$, constant mean molecular weight $\mu$ in units of hydrogen mass $m_H$, and approximately constant gravitational acceleration $g$. The ideal gas law and hydrostatic equilibrium giveIntegrating from the reference isobar yieldsReducing the pressure by a factor $e$ therefore increases the pressure-level radius by one atmospheric scale height. Constant gravity is a thin-atmosphere approximation over the height range being modeled.

A pressure-level radius is not automatically the observed transit radius. Transmission depends on the line-of-sight optical depth, which also requires composition and opacity. Different reference pressures or cloud assumptions can therefore assign different pressure levels to the same observed exoplanet transmission spectrum.^[ref]

In transit spectroscopy, starlight passes tangentially through the planet's terminator atmosphere during primary transit. Wavelength-dependent opacity changes the effective occulting radius. For a thin atmosphere with an absorption feature spanning $N_H$ atmospheric scale heights,Here $\mu$ is the mean particle mass in units of $m_H$, not a chemical potential. Large planets with warm low-gravity, low-molecular-weight atmospheres against small stars have larger signals. A spherical isothermal atmosphere has tangential column enhancement of order $\sqrt{2\pi R_p/H}$ over a vertical column, explaining sensitivity to tenuous high-altitude gas. Molecular bands, atomic lines, scattering slopes and clouds constrain the terminator, but cloud opacity, reference pressure and abundance-temperature degeneracies limit unique retrievals.^[ref]

Occultation spectroscopy instead subtracts the star-only spectrum during secondary eclipse from the star-plus-planet spectrum immediately outside eclipse. It measures the dayside planet/star flux ratio. In the blackbody approximation the thermal eclipse depth isLonger infrared wavelengths generally improve contrast for a cooler planet; molecular absorption or emission depends on the vertical temperature gradient. At optical wavelengths reflected light can dominate, with full-phase contrast $A_g(\lambda )(R_p/a{)}^2$, where $A_g$ is geometric albedo. Eclipse spectra therefore probe dayside emission or reflection, rather than the transit's slant absorption. Clouds and temperature inversions affect interpretation.^[ref]

For either measurement, the photon-limited signal-to-noise ratio scales as the spectral feature amplitude times $\sqrt{N_{\gamma }}$, with a penalty for subtracting finite in- and out-of-event samples. Finer spectral bins reduce photons per bin; bright hosts, repeated events and stable instruments improve sensitivity. Detector systematics, telluric absorption for ground observations, and variable starspots can limit the practical gain. Space observations remove telluric contamination, not stellar variability or instrumental drift. Neither technique directly measures a unique bulk composition or samples all longitudes of the planet.

Sara Seager develops physical methods for interpreting exoplanets. With Dimitar Sasselov, she calculated atmospheric transmission during an exoplanet transit: absorption in the planetary limb makes the measured transit depth depend on wavelength. Their work identified strong atomic features and cloud height as observationally useful diagnostics.^[ref]

Her models of solid planets also connect measured mass and radius to bulk composition through an equation of state. They showed how such measurements can distinguish broad iron-rich, silicate-rich and water-rich families while leaving finer compositional ambiguities. A measured mean mass density therefore constrains a family of interior models rather than uniquely revealing an interior.^[ref]