A two-phase inspection model alternates between inspecting every item and inspecting each item with probability , where . Suppose item defects are independent with probability . The first phase ends after good items have been accumulated, while the second ends upon detecting a defect. With state equal to the cumulative number of good items found during the current full-inspection phase, the Markov chain has transitions , , , .
Its stationary distribution is for and . Indeed, balance gives equal mass to every phase-A state and ; normalization fixes the common mass. The finite chain is irreducible and aperiodic, so the Markov chain ergodic theorem identifies these probabilities with long-run occupation fractions. The long-run inspected fraction is . The fraction of all production consisting of undetected defective items is .
An important modeling choice is whether defects during full inspection preserve accumulated good items or reset the count. Resetting produces the distinct consecutive-clearance inspection model and changes the long-run fractions.
In the consecutive-clearance inspection model, a run of consecutive good items is required to leave full inspection. With , , its Markov chain has transitions , for , and , . Thus every defect in the clearance phase resets the count, rather than preserving the cumulative total.
Writing , the stationary distribution is
To prove this, balance at gives , while balance at gives . Summing the geometric series and normalizing gives ; balance at zero follows as well. The inspected fraction is . The fraction of all production that is both defective and uninspected is ; the fraction among defective items alone is . All these long-run limits follow from the Markov chain ergodic theorem and the independent inspection coins. The distinction from cumulative clearance matters already at .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.