Fix an integer and consider the independent increments
For fixed these are independent and identically distributed random variables with the normal distribution , so . The second Borel-Cantelli lemma gives for infinitely many , almost surely. Intersecting these probability-one events over the countably many preserves probability one.
On any path in this intersection, uniform continuity on would give some such that whenever . Choosing with contradicts the existence of an increment . Therefore Brownian paths are not uniformly continuous on the half-line:
The event is measurable: for continuous paths, uniform continuity can be tested by countably many pairs of nonnegative rational numbers and tolerances . Brownian motion has uniform continuity on every compact time interval, but almost surely fails it on the whole half-line.
For the dyadic power variation of a continuous local martingale, write , and . Uniform continuity on gives almost surely, while the deterministic-partition characterization of quadratic variation gives in probability. In particular is bounded in probability.
If , then , and a factor tending to zero in probability times a sequence bounded in probability tends to zero in probability. Thus
If , the reverse comparison is . The assumed finite makes eventually bounded almost surely, so almost surely. By uniqueness of a limit in probability, almost surely. Its monotonicity gives for .
To finish without assuming any integrability of , apply the bound from part (i) to both and , with , and then let . For each the probability of a positive or negative excursion beyond is zero. Taking countably many proves is indistinguishable from zero on . The same argument in fact works for every under the stated pathwise boundedness assumption.
First address the positivity request in part (a), which has no separate Solution heading in the stub. For , each and each coefficient is nonnegative. Their sum is therefore nonnegative, including at the endpoints:
This is the elementary direction of the positive Bernstein coefficients for a strictly positive polynomial criterion; the converse developed later needs strict positivity.
For completeness, the convergence fact listed as (i) also has a short proof. If , the Bernstein polynomial is . Its mean argument is and . Given , uniform continuity of on the compact interval supplies such that whenever . By Chebyshev's inequality, uniformly in ,
Letting and then proves . The two numbered items in the source are assumptions supplied for later parts, not additional exam questions; their stub sections contain these supporting derivations.
For , define its Bernstein polynomial
If , then
Let . By uniform continuity, for any choose such that whenever . Splitting the expectation according to that event and using Chebyshev's inequality gives, uniformly in ,
For sufficiently large this is below . Thus uniformly on . An affine change of variable treats every compact interval, proving the Weierstrass approximation theorem.
A function is uniformly continuous if, for every , there is a such that
The same must work at every pair of points in the domain.
Let be compact and let . Since every is supported in , the function is uniformly continuous on the compact set
Given , choose so that
whenever and . Since and ,
Property 3 makes the final term smaller than for all sufficiently large , uniformly in . Hence uniformly on every compact set. The sequence is an approximate identity.
For the second part, extend to a continuous function on by setting it equal to zero outside ; continuity at the endpoints uses . Define
These nonnegative kernels have integral one. For every , their mass outside tends to zero exponentially relative to the mass near zero, so they satisfy property 3.
For , the convolution is
Because on the square , no cutoff remains in this formula. Expanding the th power shows that is a polynomial in . The first part, applied to the compact interval , gives
This proves the Weierstrass approximation theorem for functions with the stated endpoint values.
Let . For ,
Taking the supremum over proves that the integral operator is Lipschitz continuous, hence continuous, in the uniform norm.
It remains to see that is continuous. Since is uniformly continuous on the compact square and is bounded,
as . Therefore is well defined and continuous.
Fix and a coordinate direction . The fundamental theorem of calculus gives
For sufficiently small , the points lie in a fixed compact set. The continuity of makes it uniformly continuous there, so the right-hand side converges to uniformly in . We may consequently pass the limit through the finite integral:
To prove continuity, if , joint continuity makes uniformly for once the lie in a compact neighbourhood of . Hence . This proves the stated differentiation under the integral sign result and the continuity of every partial derivative.
Let be continuous. If it were unbounded, one could choose with . The Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem gives a subsequence , but continuity would then give , contradicting unboundedness.
Now let . Choose with . A convergent subsequence and continuity give at its limit. Applying the same argument to shows that the infimum is attained. This proves the extreme value theorem on a closed bounded interval.
The function
is continuous and bounded, but attains neither its infimum nor its supremum . For the second example, enumerate the rationals in as and set
Every nondegenerate interval contains infinitely many rational numbers, hence some with arbitrarily large ; therefore is unbounded on every such interval.
For the running extrema, compactness lets us write
The function is uniformly continuous on . Given , choose such that whenever . If and , every new value with is at most . Since ,
Interchanging handles the other order. Applying this argument to proves continuity of as well.
Finally fix and put . For each positive integer , there must be some with . Otherwise, for some the continuous function would satisfy on the interval . By the intermediate value theorem, would have a constant sign there. The values
would then increase or decrease by at least at every step, contradicting boundedness of . Thus and
This is always true. Since is bounded and uniformly, there are and such that
for every and . The continuous function is uniformly continuous on the compact interval . Therefore, given , a sufficiently small uniform bound on implies
Hence uniformly.
Let and be independent. The displayed Bernstein polynomial is
Given , uniform continuity of supplies such that changing both coordinates by less than changes by less than . If , then Chebyshev inequality and
give, uniformly in ,
Thus uniformly.
Each is a polynomial, whose iterated integrals may be interchanged term by term. Uniform convergence permits passage to the limit in both iterated integrals, proving the asserted continuous-function form of Fubini's theorem.
Now suppose every monomial moment of vanishes. By linearity,
for every two-variable polynomial . The just-proved Bernstein approximation gives polynomials uniformly. Therefore
so . Statement (i) is true.
Let be the th one-system marginal of , and put . Contractivity of trace distance under partial trace gives
uniformly in . Because the one-system state space is a compact space, continuity of implies uniform continuity. Hence there is a function such that
for every .
Multipartite superadditivity and additivity now imply
Therefore
which proves the required lower asymptotic semicontinuity of quantum relative entropy argument.
A product of two uniformly continuous functions need not have uniform continuity on an unbounded domain. The functions give the counterexample , since inputs and approach each other while their squared values remain separated. For bounded factors the estimate restores uniform continuity.
For with normalized Lebesgue measure, translation on the circle group is continuous in the L1 norm: as modulo one. Approximate in the L1 norm by a continuous function, use its uniform continuity, and use translation invariance to preserve the approximation error. In particular, for every measurable .
Choose the uniform continuity input tolerance corresponding to output tolerance one. A totally bounded domain is covered by finitely many balls of smaller radius centred in the domain. Every function value differs by less than one from the value at one of their finitely many centres. Taking the largest centre value bounds the whole function. Compactness or closedness of the domain is unnecessary.
If a uniformly continuous function belongs to Lp space for some , then as . Otherwise choose points escaping to infinity with . Uniform continuity gives one radius on which around every . Extract disjoint such balls. Their contributions to are each at least , a contradiction. The finite- condition is essential: the constant function one lies in and does not vanish at infinity.
If is compact, is continuous in and measurable in , and , then an independent and identically distributed sample satisfies almost surely. Uniform continuity for each , the dominated convergence theorem, and finite parameter nets produce arbitrarily narrow function brackets.