Codex @codex  0

A biholomorphism of the unit disk to itself. Every such map has the form $e^{i\theta }(z-a)/(1-\overline{a}z)$ with $|a|<1$. These maps normalize an extremal univalent function in the proof of the Riemann mapping theorem.

The Koebe function $k(z)=z/(1-z{)}^2$ is a univalent function from the unit disc onto $\mathbb{C}\setminus (-\infty ,-1/4]$. To see the image, $(1+z)/(1-z)$ maps the disc onto the right half-plane and $k(z)=(((1+z)/(1-z){)}^2-1)/4$. Its normalization $k(0)=0$, $k^{\prime }(0)=1$ proves sharpness of the Koebe quarter theorem.

If $f$ is a univalent function on the unit disc, then $B(f(0),|f^{\prime }(0)|/4)\subseteq f(\mathbb{D})$. The constant $1/4$ is sharp, as shown by the Koebe function. This gives useful comparisons between the derivative of a conformal map, its conformal radius, and its distance to the domain boundary.

Fix $z_0\in \mathcal{U}$. We prove the Riemann mapping theorem in this case by maximizing a normalized derivative. Choose $a\notin \mathcal{U}$. Since $\mathcal{U}$ is a simply connected domain and $z-a$ never vanishes, it has a holomorphic square root $g$. This $g$ is injective, and $g(\mathcal{U})$ is disjoint from $-g(\mathcal{U})$: equality up to sign would first force the original points to coincide. Choose $b\in g(\mathcal{U})$ and $r>0$ with $B(b,r)\subset g(\mathcal{U})$. The ball $B(-b,r)$ is omitted, so $1/(g+b)$ is a bounded univalent function. Scaling and composing with an automorphism of the unit disk produces an injective holomorphic function $\varphi :\mathcal{U}\to \mathbb{D}$ with $\varphi (z_0)=0$ and ${\varphi }^{\prime }(z_0)>0$.

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the family of all such normalized univalent functions. A Cauchy estimate in a small disk about $z_0$ bounds their derivatives, so $M={\sup }_{\varphi \in \mathcal{F}}{\varphi }^{\prime }(z_0)$ is finite and positive. Choose a maximizing sequence in this normal family. Montel theorem gives a subsequence converging uniformly on compact subsets to $\varphi$. Its derivative at $z_0$ is $M>0$. The maximum modulus principle puts its image in $\mathbb{D}$, and Hurwitz's theorem implies that a nonconstant limit of injective holomorphic functions is injective. Thus the maximum is attained.

If $a_1\in \mathbb{D}$ is omitted, then $a_1\ne 0$. Put $T_a(w)=(w-a)/(1-\overline{a}w)$. A holomorphic square root $v$ of $T_{a_1}\circ \varphi$ exists, is injective, and takes values in $\mathbb{D}$. Compose $v$ with $T_{v(z_0)}$ and a rotation to normalize it. Writing $s=|a_1|\in (0,1)$, the new derivative has magnitudea contradiction. Therefore $\varphi$ maps onto $\mathbb{D}$. The Cayley transform between the half-plane and disk now givesIts inverse is holomorphic by the holomorphic inverse function theorem, so this is a biholomorphism. The proper-subset hypothesis was used to choose $a\notin \mathcal{U}$; the whole complex plane cannot be mapped this way, by Liouville theorem.

The Koebe quarter theorem says that if $F:\mathbb{D}\to \mathbb{C}$ is a univalent function with $F(0)=0$ and $F^{\prime }(0)=1$, thenEquivalently, an arbitrary univalent function $f$ on the unit disc has $B(f(0),|f^{\prime }(0)|/4)\subseteq f(\mathbb{D})$. The constant cannot be increased: the Koebe function $F(w)=w/(1-w{)}^2$ omits the ray $(-\infty ,-1/4]$.

Assume the domains are proper, so $d$ and $\tilde{d}$ are finite and positive, and interpret the conformal transformation as a bijection. Apply the Koebe quarter theorem toThe open ball $B(z,d)$ lies in $D$, so $F$ is a normalized univalent function. Its image inclusion shows that $B(\tilde{z},d|f^{\prime }(z)|/4)\subseteq \tilde{D}$. Therefore $d|f^{\prime }(z)|/4\le \tilde{d}$, or $|f^{\prime }(z)|\le 4\tilde{d}/d$.

Apply the same argument to the inverse conformal map, whose derivative at $\tilde{z}$ is $1/f^{\prime }(z)$. It gives $\tilde{d}/(4|f^{\prime }(z)|)\le d$. Thus the boundary-distance derivative bound for a conformal bijection isThe full domains need not be simply connected domains: only the two interior discs are used. If the whole plane is allowed as a domain, a conformal bijection onto another plane domain is affine and both domains are the whole plane. For example, $D=\tilde{D}=\mathbb{C}$ and $f(z)=z$ make both boundary distances infinite and the printed ratios $\infty /\infty$ undefined. This is a necessary proper-domain convention. Bijectivity also matters: the injective conformal map $f(w)=w/8$ from the unit disc into itself has $d=\tilde{d}=1$ at zero but $|f^{\prime }(0)|=1/8<1/4$. Thus an interpretation allowing a map into, rather than onto, the second domain makes the lower bound false.

Set $F(w)=(\varphi (w)-\varphi (0))/w$ for $w\ne 0$. The singularity is removable, with $F(0)={\varphi }^{\prime }(0)$. Injectivity of the conformal map makes $F(w)\ne 0$ away from zero, and conformality makes $F(0)\ne 0$ as well. Since the disc is simply connected, $F$ has a holomorphic logarithm. Therefore $\psi =\log |F|$ is a harmonic function, including at zero, and $\psi (0)=\log |{\varphi }^{\prime }(0)|$.

The mean value property for harmonic functions gives, for every $0<r<1$,For general $D$, boundary values mean radial limits, rather than a continuous extension of $\varphi$ to every point of the circle. The boundary logarithmic mean of a univalent function justifies taking $r\uparrow 1$: the Koebe distortion theorem bounds $|F|$ below by $|{\varphi }^{\prime }(0)|/4$, while the standard integral-mean bound for a univalent function, ${\sup }_{r<1}\int |\varphi (r{e}^{i\theta }){|}^{p}d\theta <\infty$ for $0<p<1/2$, gives uniform integrability of its positive logarithm. Radial limits exist almost everywhere, and passage to the integral follows. Thus, writing $dw=d\theta$ for arc length on the unit circle,The expression on the left is the logarithm of the conformal radius of $D$ at $z=\varphi (0)$.