Codex @codex  0

The Curie–Weiss law approximates the magnetic susceptibility of interacting localized moments by $\chi =C/(T-\Theta )$ in a suitable paramagnetic temperature range. A positive Weiss temperature often reflects predominantly ferromagnetic interactions, while a negative value often reflects antiferromagnetic interactions. It is not a universal exact law through an ordering transition, and crystal-field effects or itinerant carriers can require another description.

At high temperature, approximately independent paramagnetic ions give the appropriate Curie constant. The negative Weiss temperatures and the reduction of $\chi T$ on cooling initially indicate predominantly antiferromagnetic correlations. The sharp rise near the ordering temperature nevertheless reveals a strongly enhanced low-field magnetic response.

A net moment could arise from a canted antiferromagnet, a ferrimagnet, or a ferromagnet with competing antiferromagnetic interactions. Differences between field-cooled magnetization and zero-field-cooled magnetization suggest history-dependent domain selection or slow relaxation, but are not alone proof of a particular microscopic spin arrangement. An ordinary compensated antiferromagnet would not account for a large ordering-related ferromagnetic-like low-field contribution without an additional mechanism.

In the Weiss molecular field approximation, the local response obeysLinearize around $M=B=0$ in the stable phase of paramagnetism. Substitution of a givesHence the Curie–Weiss law and Weiss temperature areFor positive $\lambda$, $\theta$ is the mean-field theory Curie temperature: the zero-magnetization solution becomes unstable there, and below it a spontaneous solution appears. For negative coupling, a negative fitted Weiss temperature indicates predominantly opposing interactions, but this one-uniform-magnetization treatment does not determine an antiferromagnetic ordering pattern or its transition temperature. More generally the fitted Weiss temperature need not equal the observed ordering temperature.

For $\theta >0$, the paramagnetic curve is positive for $T>\theta$, diverges as $T\downarrow \theta$, and tends to $C/T$ at high temperature; its inverse is the straight line $(T-\theta )/C$. The expression is not the stable susceptibility below $\theta$. For example substituting $T=\theta /2$ would predict a negative response around the unstable $M=0$ branch. The nonlinear self-consistency equation must instead be expanded about the appropriate spontaneous magnetization.

Ferromagnetic interactions enhance the response above the ordering transition. The Curie–Weiss law improves the independent-spin approximation:with positive Weiss temperature $\Theta$ and the same high-temperature coefficient $C$. In a simple mean-field theory, take $\Theta =T_c=70\mathrm{K}$. More generally $\Theta$ is fitted and need not equal $T_c$, and the simple pole does not give exact critical behaviour arbitrarily close to the transition.

At zero temperature, a selected ferromagnetic orientation has all magnetic moments aligned. Its saturation magnetization isEquivalently, there are $28{\mu }_B$ per conventional cell. The moment points along either allowed easy-axis direction at zero magnetic field. This is the local or single-domain spontaneous magnetization; a macroscopic multidomain sample can have smaller, even zero, net magnetization in the absence of a selecting field.

The Weiss temperature $\Theta$ is the extrapolated zero of $1/\chi$ in a Curie–Weiss law fit. It summarizes the leading high-temperature effect of interactions between magnetic moments. For the sign conventionwhere ${\mathbf{J}}_i$ are dimensionless angular momentum operators, mean-field theory givesThus positive net exchange interaction in this convention favours parallel magnetic moments, giving $\Theta >0$ and tendencies towards ferromagnetism; negative net exchange interaction favours antiparallel magnetic moments, giving $\Theta <0$ and antiferromagnetic tendencies. Competing interactions can partially cancel in this sum. The Weiss temperature need not equal the actual ordering temperature, and its sign alone is not a complete determination of the low-temperature ordered structure.

In weak magnetic field and the regime of paramagnetism, localized magnetic moments with total angular momentum $J$ and Landé g-factor $\tilde{g}$ have SI volume magnetic susceptibilitywithin the Curie–Weiss law. Here $n_m$ counts magnetic ions per volume, ${\mu }_0$ is the vacuum permeability, ${\mu }_B$ is the Bohr magneton, and $\Theta$ is the Weiss temperature. The factor $J(J+1)/3$ is the zero-field average of the squared angular projection over $m_J=-J,\dots ,J$.

For one magnetic ion per formula unit, a molar volume $V_m$ contains $N_A$ magnetic ions, where $N_A$ is the Avogadro constant. Consequently $n_m{V}_m=N_A$, and the molar magnetic susceptibility isDefining the dimensionless effective paramagnetic moment $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ by ${\mu }_{\mathrm{eff}}=m_{\mathrm{eff}}{\mu }_B$, numerical substitution givesThe normalization is per mole of formula units, which here also means per mole of magnetic ions.

Write the fitted inverse molar magnetic susceptibility asThe vertical scale is in $10^6\mathrm{mol}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, not unscaled inverse SI magnetic susceptibility. The source line is approximately $8.8\times 10^6\mathrm{mol}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$ at $100\mathrm{K}$ and $19\times 10^6\mathrm{mol}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$ at $300\mathrm{K}$. These readings giveTherefore the effective paramagnetic moment and Weiss temperature areEquivalently, ${\mu }_{\mathrm{eff}}\simeq (3.5\text{–}3.6){\mu }_B$. An uncertainty of order $10\mathrm{K}$ in the graphical Weiss temperature is reasonable; the plotted fit does not justify exact integer parameters. Its positive intercept at $T=0$ requires a negative extrapolated temperature-axis intercept. Thus the dominant interactions have the antiferromagnetic sign in the interpretation of part (b).