Codex @codex  0

An electron-magnetohydrodynamic cascade transfers magnetic fluctuations through the nonlinear electron magnetohydrodynamics induction equation. Writing $b_l=\delta B_l/B_0$, its perpendicular nonlinear interaction time is ${\tau }_{\mathrm{nl}}\sim l_{\perp }^2/(v_A{d}_i{b}_l)$. The anisotropic whistler wave time is ${\tau }_w\sim l_{\parallel }{l}_{\perp }/(v_A{d}_i)$. Scaling predictions depend on locality, phase decorrelation and the assumed balance of these times.

For a uniform guide field, write the transverse perturbation in velocity units as $\mathbf{b}$. Linear momentum gives $\omega \mathbf{u}=-k_{\parallel }{v}_A\mathbf{b}$. Linear induction gives $\omega \mathbf{b}=-k_{\parallel }{v}_A\mathbf{u}+i{k}_{\parallel }{v}_A{d}_i\mathbf{k}\times \mathbf{b}$. The helicity decomposition of a transverse Fourier mode then yields the displayed dispersion relation. Its two positive frequency magnitudes are $|k_{\parallel }|v_A[\sqrt{1+(k{d}_i{)}^2/4}\pm k{d}_i/2]$, approaching the Alfvén wave frequency for $k{d}_i\ll 1$. For $k{d}_i\gg 1$, the fast branch is a whistler wave and the slow branch tends to $|k_{\parallel }|v_A/(k{d}_i)$.

A kinetic Alfvén wave is a dispersive extension of the Alfvén wave in a plasma when perpendicular kinetic or two-fluid effects, including a pressure response, matter. Its particular dispersion relation depends on the ordering and plasma parameters. A similar product of parallel and perpendicular wavenumbers can occur in a whistler wave, but agreement of a scaling power does not identify the underlying physical equations.

When $k{d}_i\gg 1$, expand the square root in the exact frequencies. The fast branch haswhile the slow branch has ${\Omega }_{\mathrm{slow}}=|q|[(k{d}_i{)}^{-1}+O((k{d}_i{)}^{-3})]$. HenceThe fast dispersive wave is the mode sought in the question's subsequent fast-time limit. In a strongly oblique wave, $k\simeq k_{\perp }$, so its frequency scales as $|\omega |\simeq |k_{\parallel }|v_A{k}_{\perp }{d}_i$. The slow branch instead tends to $(|k_{\parallel }|/k){\Omega }_i$, where the ion cyclotron frequency is ${\Omega }_i=v_A/d_i=e{B}_0/(m_{i}c)$.

There is a terminology qualification: in the pressure-free incompressible Hall equations used here, the fast branch is conventionally a whistler wave. The question calls the requested small-scale waves kinetic Alfvén waves, but a general kinetic-Alfvén dispersion includes pressure/kinetic ordering absent from these equations. The boxed dispersion is the result for the printed model; no extra pressure response or kinetic term has been silently added.

Put $a=c/(4\pi en)$ and retain terms linear in $\delta \mathbf{B}$. The electron magnetohydrodynamics induction equation becomesHere the curl of $(\nabla \times \delta \mathbf{B})\times B_0\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ reduces to $B_0{\partial }_z\nabla \times \delta \mathbf{B}$, since the background magnetic field is constant and the divergence of a curl vanishes. For a plane wave $\delta \mathbf{B}=\mathbf{b}{e}^{i(\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t)}$, the linear equation and the solenoidal constraint areOn the transverse plane, the operator $i\mathbf{k}\times$ has eigenvalues $\pm k$ by the helicity decomposition of a transverse Fourier mode. Equivalently, squaring the equation and using the vector triple product gives ${\omega }^2=a^2{B}_0^2{k}_{\parallel }^2{k}^2$. Since $a{B}_0=v_A{d}_i$, where $v_A$ is the Alfvén speed and $d_i$ the ion skin depth,The two branches have opposite circular polarizations. The specified electron-only induction model describes a whistler wave; the paper calls these branches kinetic Alfvén waves. The following cascade calculation uses the specified model and its dispersion relation, without adding the pressure response needed for the usual kinetic Alfvén interpretation.