Let be the constant diagonal metric matrix in a local pseudo-orthonormal frame, and define . The metric compatibility of the Levi-Civita connection gives
Thus the lowered connection matrix is antisymmetric, including in indefinite signature. Ordinary matrix antisymmetry of itself is not the corresponding assertion in indefinite signature.
Let be the dual coframe, and write a vector field as . Then
Subtract the same expression with exchanged and subtract . By the definition of the exterior derivative, this gives the components of the torsion tensor:
The Levi-Civita connection is torsion-free, so Cartan's first structure equation is
Use and define its matrix of curvature two-forms by . Applying two covariant derivatives to yields
The first three terms are and the last two are . Therefore Cartan's second structure equation is
The associated Riemann curvature tensor components satisfy with this convention.
For a position-dependent change of pseudo-orthonormal frame, write the frame row as , with . The dual coframe obeys . Applying the Leibniz rule to gives
The connection one-form has an inhomogeneous term because differentiating the moving basis produces . The curvature two-form instead transforms homogeneously. Indeed, curvature is tensorial in the vector to which it is applied, so . Consequently
Equivalently, substituting the transformed connection into and using cancels all derivative terms and gives the same result. This transformation law holds for a general invertible frame change as well; the orthogonality condition ensures both frames remain pseudo-orthonormal.
One definition of a principal bundle uses local trivializations whose overlap maps are
with smooth -valued transition functions of a principal bundle satisfying the cocycle condition. This definition displays the global right group action rather than assuming it: if , define . On an overlap,
so the local definitions agree. The resulting action is smooth, free and transitive on each fibre, and respects the projection.
If is a global section of a fiber bundle, set . The free and transitive fibre action makes bijective. In a local trivialization, write ; then and its inverse is . Both are smooth and respect the action and projection. Conversely a principal bundle isomorphism sends to a global section. Hence
For a pseudo-Riemannian manifold of metric signature , its orthonormal frame bundle has fibre at consisting of linear isometries . Its structure group is and its right action is . Two such frames differ by a unique element of , proving the required free and transitive fibre action. A global section is exactly a global pseudo-orthonormal frame. Orientation and time orientation, when specified, restrict the structure group and the allowed frames.
Realize unit-radius four-dimensional de Sitter spacetime as
Its tangent space is , with Lorentzian metric signature . If is a pseudo-orthonormal frame at , append as the final column. The resulting five-by-five matrix preserves , and conversely every such matrix supplies a point and a frame at that point. Thus the full frame bundle is , with projection and fibre group .
The printed statement requires the orientation restriction. Choose the tangent orientation by requiring the appended matrix to have determinant one. Then
is precisely the oriented frame bundle of de Sitter spacetime, with right structure group embedded as . If future time orientation is also required, use and . Calling the full bundle without specifying orientation would exclude valid frames of the opposite orientation.
Finally write the global coordinates
Direct differentiation gives the de Sitter spacetime metric . The assumed global frame of a vector bundle on can be orthonormalized smoothly by Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization for the round positive metric. More explicitly, view as the unit quaternions: , , form a smooth global orthonormal tangent basis. Set
These have inner products , and . They are smooth everywhere because never vanishes. Choose the spatial orientation consistently, reversing one if necessary, and choose future-directed. This global frame on four-dimensional de Sitter spacetime yields a global section of the full frame bundle and also of either restricted bundle. Yes: the de Sitter frame bundle admits a global section and is trivial.
Use ambient quadratic form . The printed sine coordinate has a duplicated superscript: it must be , not another . With that correction the embedding lies on . Put . Differentiating the two timelike coordinates gives
whereas the two spatial coordinates give . Their difference is the induced Lorentzian metric
The polar coordinate collapses at ; this is a coordinate degeneracy, not a degeneracy of the metric.
For the matrix model of anti-de Sitter three-space, define
Then . This linear identification of ambient space with real two-by-two matrices identifies with . Its inverse recovers each by sums and differences of matrix entries, so the identification is global. The identity corresponds to and the other coordinates zero. For a traceless tangent matrix , the induced squared norm is
Polarization gives .
The Killing form of is . This normalization can be checked without assuming it: for , and , the brackets are , , . Taking traces of their three-dimensional adjoint matrices gives , , and all other basis pairings zero. These agree with .
Both left and right multiplication by matrices in preserve , hence its polarized ambient bilinear form and the induced metric. Equality at the identity therefore propagates throughout the group:
In particular the Killing-form Einstein metric calculation gives , consistent with unit-radius three-dimensional Anti-de Sitter spacetime.
Every element of preserves the ambient quadratic form, hence the hyperboloid and its induced metric, and so acts by isometries. Define the left-right double cover of SO0(2,2) by
This is a group homomorphism, since successive actions multiply the two factors in the same order. It preserves ; as a transformation of the four-dimensional matrix space it has determinant . Thus it takes values in .
If its action is the identity, applying it to gives . Commuting with every matrix then forces to be scalar. The condition leaves only or . Hence
The differential is . A zero differential implies and that is scalar; tracelessness makes . It is therefore an isomorphism onto the target Lie algebra, since both dimensions are six. The image is an open subgroup. Since is connected, the image is connected and is exactly the identity component : an open subgroup of a connected group is also closed and must be the whole group. Thus the precise covering statement is
It is not onto the disconnected full . For example, conjugation , , sends to and belongs to the other component of . It reverses the orientation of the negative two-plane and is not in the image of the connected source.
The Adjoint representation of a Lie group of preserves its Killing form of metric signature and gives a second double cover,
Its kernel is the scalar centre; its differential is injective and both dimensions are three, so the same connected-image argument proves surjectivity onto the identity component. The full again has an additional component. Thus is locally the same Lie group geometry as , with its Killing metric, and globally is its central quotient.
With the printed periodic time, the group model has topology and closed timelike curves, since varying at fixed spatial position gives a timelike circle. The causally unwrapped version of Anti-de Sitter spacetime instead has and is the universal covering Lie group. It must not be substituted silently for the periodic spacetime specified here.
A Poisson manifold is a smooth manifold with an antisymmetric contravariant tensor field such that the bracket
satisfies the Jacobi identity. Bilinearity, antisymmetry and the Leibniz rule follow directly from this formula. The Poisson bivector is allowed to be degenerate.
Apply the Jacobi identity to coordinate functions . Necessity gives the coordinate Jacobi condition for a Poisson bivector:
For sufficiency, expand . The terms differentiating are . All terms containing second derivatives cancel. For example, those containing have coefficient , which is antisymmetric under after contraction with , whereas is symmetric. The same argument handles the second derivatives of and . Thus the displayed condition is both necessary and sufficient.
A symplectic manifold has a smooth nondegenerate closed differential form of degree two. Write and choose the explicit inverse convention . This defines a smooth antisymmetric bivector. Differentiating the inverse matrix gives
Substitution into the Jacobi coefficient, followed by relabeling summed indices, gives
since the parentheses are the components of . Hence every symplectic manifold carries a Poisson structure. The opposite overall convention for the inverse bracket gives the same conclusion. Nondegeneracy and closure together are crucial; an arbitrary invertible antisymmetric tensor need not satisfy the Jacobi identity.
For a finite-dimensional Lie algebra , its dual space carries the Lie-Poisson bracket
where are identified with elements of . If and , this reads . The Jacobi coefficient is
which vanishes by the Lie algebra Jacobi identity.
In particular, the dual of is with the rotational Lie-Poisson structure on R3,
The Poisson bivector has rank two away from the origin and rank zero at the origin. The function is a Casimir function, since its bracket with every function vanishes. The centred spheres are its two-dimensional symplectic leaves, and the origin is a point leaf. This is a Poisson manifold but not a symplectic manifold: its bivector is not invertible, and an odd-dimensional manifold cannot have a nondegenerate alternating bilinear form.
For a group action of on , the orbit of a group action through is , and its stabilizer subgroup is . A transitive group action has one orbit. A simply transitive group action has exactly one element carrying any given point to any other; equivalently it is transitive and every stabilizer subgroup is trivial.
In the modern terminology, a multiply transitive group action is transitive on ordered -tuples of distinct points for some . In older geometric usage, the phrase can instead mean transitive but not simply transitive, so that there are several elements carrying one point to another. Under either interpretation the action is transitive, and that alone is what the following argument needs. These meanings should not be confused: a transitive action with nontrivial stabilizers need not be two-transitive.
Fix and put . Define
This is well-defined because every element of fixes . It is surjective by transitivity, and is equivalent to , proving injectivity. For a smooth Lie group action, is closed, since it is the inverse image of under the orbit map. The orbit map has constant rank: translations in and the action diffeomorphisms of intertwine its differentials. Transitivity makes this rank ; otherwise every point would be a critical value, contradicting Sard theorem. Its local submersion charts give smooth local sections and hence a smooth inverse for . Therefore
Choosing replaces by . Thus the stabilizer subgroup is determined by the base point, and intrinsically only up to conjugacy. A simply transitive group action gives .
For a finite quantum system with Hilbert space , a pure state is a nonzero vector modulo multiplication by a nonzero complex number. Equivalently, it is a unit vector modulo its physically irrelevant phase. Consequently the space of pure states is the space of complex lines,
The qualification “pure” is essential: arbitrary quantum states include mixed density matrices and do not form Complex projective space.
The unitary group acts transitively on these lines: choose unit vectors in two given lines, complete each to an orthonormal basis, and map one basis to the other by a unitary transformation. The stabilizer of the line consists exactly of block matrices with and . Indeed a unitary transformation preserving the line also preserves its orthogonal complement. The homogeneous space description is therefore
Its real dimension is . This action is generally not two-transitive: the absolute inner product between unit representatives of two lines is invariant.
The Hopf fibration is the projection , . The right action , , is free, and its orbits are exactly the fibres. On the chart where , write for . A smooth local section is
Every unit vector over this chart has the unique expression , where . These formulas provide local trivializations , proving that this is a principal bundle with fibre . For it has no global section: a global section would give , contradicting their fundamental groups. For the base is a point and the bundle is trivial.
For the Lie algebra of a Lie group , let . The Killing form is the symmetric bilinear form
For a finite-dimensional real Lie algebra, the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity says that is nondegenerate precisely when is a semisimple Lie algebra. Thus a semisimple Lie group supplies the required condition. Compactness alone is insufficient: an abelian Lie algebra, including that of a torus, has zero Killing form.
The Jacobi identity gives . Cyclic invariance of the trace therefore gives
There is also invariance under the full Adjoint representation of a Lie group: , so .
Define a pseudo-Riemannian metric by translating from the identity:
It is smooth and nondegenerate. Left translations preserve it by construction. Right translation, expressed in left-translated tangent coordinates, acts by , so it also preserves the metric. This constructs a bi-invariant pseudo-Riemannian metric.
For left-invariant vector fields, the derivative terms in the Koszul formula vanish. Invariance of then gives
Use the Riemann curvature tensor convention . Substituting the Levi-Civita connection and using the Jacobi identity yields
The Ricci tensor is the trace of . Since , it follows that
This is the Killing-form Einstein metric. Rescaling to , with nonzero constant , gives Einstein metric constant .
For a compact semisimple Lie group, is negative definite and is a positive-definite bi-invariant Riemannian metric. For example, has topology and metric signature for , while has the same Lie algebra and metric signature, but topology . The special linear group has metric signature and topology ; its universal covering Lie group has topology and the same Killing form. The real Lie algebra of has metric signature , and the group has topology . Thus the Killing form distinguishes compact from noncompact directions in these semisimple examples, but does not determine global topology or distinguish different covering groups.
Keep the unit-normal sign explicit: . Since the hypersurface is spacelike its normal is timelike. Construct
Choose the sign of n for the desired time orientation. The pullback of h is the nondegenerate induced metric. The second fundamental form is
Its sign reverses when n reverses. It is tangential in both indices and symmetric: the antisymmetric part of the derivative of a normalized gradient vanishes after both tangential projections. Equivalently it is the projected Hessian of f divided by the normalizing factor. This is the normal-change definition of extrinsic curvature.
For tangent vector fields X,Y, let D be the induced Levi-Civita connection. Orthogonality to n gives the derivative decomposition
Use the curvature convention of the preceding solution, . Substitute the decomposition twice and take its tangential component. Terms differentiated normally cancel, while the two normal components contribute the quadratic shape terms:
Lowering the first curvature index gives the Gauss equation for a nonnull hypersurface
All four displayed indices on the left are tangential.
Contract with and use for tangential contractions. The double-normal term vanishes by curvature antisymmetry and each mixed contraction is ambient Ricci curvature. With this gives
This also records which metric and curvature conventions enter the sign.
In vacuum without a cosmological constant, the ambient Ricci tensor and scalar vanish. A totally umbilic hypersurface has , so and . Therefore the scalar curvature of an umbilic vacuum hypersurface is .
To express the requested nonnegative version, take Lorentz signature , so the timelike unit normal has and h is the induced negative-definite spatial metric. Then
If instead one uses signature and its positive-definite spatial metric with the same curvature-slot convention, the scalar is . Replacing h by reverses its scalar curvature. Thus the printed inequality has a signature/induced-metric convention built into it; the general formula above makes that choice explicit rather than losing the sign. The metric in the separate final question explicitly uses the mostly-plus signature.
An orthonormal tetrad, or vierbein, is a local basis of tangent vectors together with inverse coframe , satisfying and . Capital indices label the locally orthonormal Lorentz frame; lower-case indices label spacetime coordinates. Changing the frame by a local Lorentz transformation leaves the metric unchanged. A spinor description uses a compatible local spin frame and the torsion-free spin connection.
Let fixed flat matrices satisfy . The curved spacetime gamma matrices are and . Therefore
The identity matrix is four by four for a four-dimensional Dirac spinor. The combined tensor/spin covariant derivative makes , the Clifford version of the tetrad postulate.
Fix the curvature slots by , with , and . The torsion-free spin connection then has . These choices fix the signs in the requested identities.
Write and similarly for four indices. Clifford anticommutation gives
On contraction with the Riemann curvature tensor, the four-form term vanishes by the first Bianchi identity. The first and last two-form terms vanish by pair antisymmetry; the remaining two-form terms are symmetric Ricci contractions against antisymmetric gamma matrices and vanish too. The scalar terms are zero, minus R and minus R respectively. Thus the Riemann tensor Clifford contraction is
This algebraic result is independent of Lorentz signature when the contraction convention is held fixed.
Apply the Dirac operator twice, using covariant constancy of the gamma matrices. Define the rough wave operator by , with the full connection acting on the intermediate covector-spinor derivative. Splitting the product into symmetric and antisymmetric parts gives
Consequently the Lichnerowicz spinor-square formula and the assumed massless Dirac equation imply . Torsion would modify the commutator and introduce extra terms, so the torsion-free connection is part of this argument.
A stationary black hole behaves mechanically like an equilibrium thermodynamic system. Its horizon area A, asymptotic energy E, angular momentum J and electric charge Q are linked by the laws of black-hole mechanics. Let generate its Killing horizon, with the time translation normalized at infinity; its surface gravity is defined by on that horizon. We use and keep G explicit. The horizon electrostatic potential is measured relative to infinity.
The Zeroth law of black-hole mechanics states that kappa is constant on each connected stationary horizon, under the Einstein equations and suitable energy/regularity assumptions. It parallels the zeroth law of thermodynamics, which makes temperature uniform in equilibrium. Kappa need not be constant in a dynamical geometry. For an asymptotically flat static hole, local observers see gravitationally redshifted temperatures; the equilibrium quantity comparable to kappa is the temperature referenced to infinity.
The First law of black-hole mechanics relates nearby stationary solutions:
The same leading relation describes a small physical process which perturbs a horizon and subsequently settles to equilibrium, with the appropriate hypotheses on fluxes and final state. The work terms correspond to rotational and electromagnetic work. The structural analogy with the first law of thermodynamics, , identifies area as an entropy-like variable and surface gravity as a temperature-like variable. Classically this fixes their product in the first law, rather than their separate normalizations.
The second law of black-hole mechanics, or black-hole area theorem, states that future event-horizon area does not decrease classically. Its essential geometric ingredient is the Raychaudhuri equation for affinely parametrized null generators. In four dimensions a hypersurface-orthogonal congruence obeys
The null energy condition and Einstein equations make the last term nonpositive. If the expansion became negative, the inequality would focus the generators to a conjugate point in finite affine parameter. Under future completeness and predictability assumptions, that would conflict with their remaining on an achronal event horizon. Thus , and the area element, satisfying , cannot decrease. For a merger the final area is at least the sum of the initial component areas. These assumptions matter: the theorem is a classical statement, not a prohibition of quantum evaporation.
The third law of black-hole mechanics is an unattainability statement: a nonextremal hole cannot be driven to zero surface gravity in a finite physical process satisfying the usual bounded-stress and regularity conditions. This parallels the unattainability form of the third law of thermodynamics. Extremal stationary solutions exist, so the law concerns how an initially nonextremal hole approaches them. The stronger entropy form of Nernst's theorem does not transfer unchanged: extremal holes can have finite area and entropy, depending on their conserved charges.
Quantum field theory turns the mechanical analogy into a physical thermodynamic identification. Hawking radiation is thermal at infinity to leading semiclassical order, with
These give exactly, so the mechanical first law becomes the thermodynamic first law with Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Scattering through the exterior adds greybody factors to the emitted spectrum but leaves this temperature identification intact. Equilibrium with an external bath and isolated evaporation are different physical states of the field.
During black-hole evaporation, the area can decrease because the semiclassical stress tensor need not satisfy the classical null energy condition. The proposed generalized second law applies instead to , asserting nondecrease of the combined entropy. A Schwarzschild hole illustrates an unusual thermodynamic property: , so its heat capacity is negative. It becomes hotter as it loses energy and is unstable in a simple canonical heat bath, while entropy and energy laws still describe an isolated system. The quantum temperature, area entropy and generalized second law supply the correspondence; the mechanical laws alone do not establish a thermal emission spectrum or a microscopic entropy count.
Assume standard radiation-dominated expansion, negligible chemical potential, one neutrino helicity and one antineutrino helicity, and a stable species with no later entropy injection. Use natural units and unreduced Planck mass . The relativistic energy density is . The Friedmann equation then gives
For thermal decoupling in cosmology, equate the interaction rate to :
This order-of-magnitude estimate assumes the supplied rate law remains applicable there.
A decoupled relativistic species cools as , while annihilations heat the coupled bath. Treat the supplied high-temperature count as the remaining bath's entropy count, approximately equal to its energy count. Cosmological entropy conservation down to ordinary neutrino decoupling gives
Subsequent electron-positron annihilation in cosmology heats photons but neither neutrino population. Therefore the two-stage entropy dilution of an early-decoupled neutrino gives
The ordinary Cosmic neutrino background has . If the rounded count instead includes the new two helicities, the remaining bath count is ; this changes the answer only slightly, to about . Keeping the extra species' entropy separate is essential in either convention.
For the two relativistic fermion states, . Photon and three standard neutrino species have present entropy degrees of freedom, referred to ,
Writing , the fractional entropy of a relativistically decoupled species is
Thus approximately 1.7% of the thermal particle entropy is in the new neutrinos and antineutrinos. If counts all states before the new decoupling, the fraction is . These are the same rounded estimate. The question concerns the radiation/relic thermal entropy budget; it does not supply a model for entropy in later black holes or other gravitational structures.
If has a small mass but decoupled relativistically, its comoving particle number is still conserved. The relativistic-neutrino number-density ratio gives
Once nonrelativistic, . The density bound on a relativistically decoupled massive relic is therefore
Using the standard present photon abundance and critical-density normalization, this is approximately , where is the present Hubble normalization, not a magnetic field. A stable relic must not exceed the permitted matter density; for example, if , even assigning all matter to it gives only an order- mass ceiling.
A stronger restriction can follow from neutrino free streaming and the observed formation of large-scale structure of the universe: a light thermal population acts as hot rather than cold dark matter, erasing structure below its streaming scale. If at most a fraction of the matter may be in this population, replace the overclosure ceiling by . The allowed fraction is observational input and is not supplied, so the paper does not determine a unique tighter mass limit. A species still relativistic today is radiation rather than matter; its contribution to the effective number of neutrino species is , and must instead satisfy the radiation-density constraints. These conclusions assume stable thermally populated states; decay or nonstandard entropy histories change the bounds.
For a homogeneous canonical inflaton, and . Vacuum domination by a scalar field requires positive potential energy to dominate both kinetic energy and any competing material components. Then and the expansion is nearly vacuum-like. Exact scalar-driven acceleration requires , equivalently ; potential domination is a stronger condition.
The slow-roll approximation additionally neglects compared with in the inflaton equation of motion. Define the unreduced Planck mass ; it differs from the reduced Planck mass by . Sufficient potential-flatness conditions are
together with approach to the slow-roll attractor. The reduced equations are and .
For , take and the positive-field rolling branch. Then
The field velocity is constant to this order. Choosing the start at gives the quadratic-potential slow-roll solution
The PDF puts inside this square root; the converted TeX incorrectly moves it outside. Next integrate :
Thus the number of e-folds is the logarithmic expansion, not the expansion factor itself:
Here . The usual quadratic-inflation endpoint estimate sets , giving
This is an endpoint estimate, not an exact result from the full equations. Exact acceleration ends at the Hubble slow-roll parameter , equivalently . Inserting the slow-roll velocity into that last condition instead gives ; the different order-one coefficient illustrates the failing approximation at the endpoint. A precise value requires the full scalar and Friedmann evolution. The large initial-field contribution to is unaffected by that order-one uncertainty.
Finally gives . The quadratic-inflation expansion from Planck density is therefore
For this is enormous and the initial field is in the slow-roll regime. No unique numerical factor follows without specifying . Extrapolating the classical model from Planck density is only a formal estimate; it does not establish control of quantum-gravity corrections at that starting scale.
Work in natural units , initially neglecting helium and excited hydrogen states. The reaction is in chemical equilibrium when , since equilibrium photons have zero chemical potential. Substitution of the nonrelativistic Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution for the three densities gives
For ground-state hydrogen use , , and in the translational prefactor. Writing its Hydrogen binding energy as , this becomes . Charge neutrality gives , while baryon conservation gives . Hence the hydrogen-only Saha equation is
The photon Bose-Einstein distribution supplies , where is the usual Riemann zeta function value in the thermal number integral. With baryon-to-photon ratio , substitution yields
This reproduces the requested numerical coefficient, with the printed interpreted as the thermal value. There is a normalization ambiguity in the PDF: it writes without defining . To reproduce this coefficient, must mean photon number density. If has its usual entropy density meaning, the Saha baryon-abundance normalization instead gives
The two forms agree through , with the entropy sector specified. A baryon-to-entropy ratio cannot simply be inserted into the photon-normalized expression.
As the universe cools, the Boltzmann factor favors neutral atoms and cosmological recombination sharply lowers . For an order-one ionized fraction the photon-normalized equation gives the balance
up to an order-one ionization-fraction factor. The small baryon abundance means that there are very many photons per baryon: even a small high-energy photon tail can ionize most atoms. Thus the recombination temperature is far below the microscopic binding scale , typically a few tenths of an eV for the standard abundance, rather than of order .
Photon decoupling is a related but distinct kinetic event. The Thomson scattering rate falls relative to as free electrons disappear, and photons begin free streaming. The precise last-scattering epoch depends on integrated optical depth, not only the local equality of rates. At still lower density the effective recombination rate per electron also drops below the expansion rate. Residual electron freeze-out leaves a small nonzero ionized fraction, larger than the vanishingly small equilibrium Saha prediction; radiative atomic bottlenecks mean the entire history cannot be obtained from equilibrium alone.
The temperature comparison in the last request needs an interpretation. If “reionisation temperature” means the microscopic thermal ionization scale, the large photon-to-baryon ratio explains why cosmological recombination requires . If it means later cosmic reionization, there is no universal thermal threshold: stars or other sources supply ionizing photons and can reheat gas. The cosmological photon background is actually colder at that later epoch, because . Its temperature therefore cannot literally be higher than the background temperature at recombination merely because hydrogen is reionized.
Use units and take the initially expanding branch with ordinary positive matter or radiation density. In the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric, respectively describe positive, zero and negative spatial curvature. Separately conserved pressureless matter has and radiation in cosmology has , so either dominates the curvature and vacuum terms sufficiently far back on a hot Big Bang branch.
With negligible cosmological constant, a spatially flat radiation universe has and a flat matter universe has ; both expand forever while decelerating. An open universe also expands forever and eventually becomes approximately curvature dominated, with . A closed universe containing only ordinary matter/radiation reaches a maximum size and recollapses. For example, dust gives with , so only admits the positive turning point .
Curvature alone does not determine the fate when the cosmological constant is retained. Positive can cause late accelerated expansion and prevent even a closed universe from recollapsing; whether a closed expanding branch turns around depends on the relative matter and vacuum terms. Negative can cause recollapse even for flat or open spatial sections. These statements follow by inspecting for dust; the curvature sign is a geometrical classification, not by itself a universal destiny criterion.
Define the critical density and cosmological density parameters , , and . The Friedmann equation gives . Dividing the Friedmann acceleration equation by gives
Consequently
The deceleration parameter measures the sign and size of the acceleration relative to : means deceleration, accelerated expansion and instantaneously zero acceleration. In particular a falling Hubble parameter alone does not imply deceleration, since .
For conformal time , the conformal Hubble parameter is . Using matter conservation and differentiating ,
This is the matter density flow with a cosmological constant. Neglecting during matter domination reduces it to the requested relation
That last equation is not exact with nonzero . For example, a flat dust-plus-vacuum state with gives , whereas the matter-only expression gives .
For the flatness problem, let . Curvature satisfies , so
In decelerating near-flat radiation and matter eras, deviations therefore grow as and respectively. Maintaining small curvature at a late epoch requires very small early deviations unless a prior mechanism suppresses them. Cosmic inflation, with , drives the deviation down approximately as . If vacuum energy is present, flatness means , not .
Both metrics have curvature radius one and signature . Their global topology must be specified as well as their local metric. The usual two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime is the hyperboloid in three-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, parametrized by
Thus and is periodic modulo , for example . Spatial slices are circles. Unwrapping instead gives the universal cover, not the usual closed spatial model.
The ordinary two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime hyperboloid is in ambient signature , with
On this quadric and is periodic modulo . The closed time circles are timelike, so it contains closed timelike curves. The usual physically causal AdS model is its universal cover, for which , with time no longer identified. The signed radial coordinate has two spatial ends; restricting to would retain only half of this global model. The metric by itself cannot distinguish periodic time from the cover. The scalar curvature is for de Sitter and for AdS in the Ricci convention of Q2. Both are maximally symmetric and have no curvature singularity; these toy two-dimensional metrics illustrate causal geometry rather than the ordinary four-dimensional matter field equations.
For the conformal cylinder of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime, introduce
Then
The conformal boundaries are spacelike circles, representing past and future infinity. Null geodesics are straight lines , with the periodic spatial identification. The finite total conformal-time interval explains the cosmological horizons: light cannot complete a full trip around the circle during the entire history.
For the conformal strip of two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime, use
so on the universal cover
Its two conformal boundaries at are timelike. Null rays are , and the strip extends for arbitrarily long coordinate time. The distances in these conformal diagrams are not physical lengths: a conformal boundary may be reached in finite coordinate time while lying infinitely far away in physical affine parameter.
Figure 1.
Conformal cylinder and observer horizons of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime, compared with the timelike boundaries and geodesics of the AdS universal cover
. Details.
The sides of the de Sitter diagram are identified; its top and bottom are spacelike infinities. The AdS diagram shows a finite window of an infinite time strip, with no identification of top and bottom. Null rays have slope one in both diagrams. The blue curves are timelike geodesics, while the colored de Sitter lines bound the central observer's causal domains.
The geodesics of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime can be derived directly. Let an overdot denote an affine parameter normalized so that the tangent norm is for timelike, null and spacelike geodesics. The cyclic coordinate gives conserved , and normalization gives
Writing reduces this to . For a future-directed timelike geodesic,
The spatially comoving curves are geodesics, and every timelike geodesic extends through all , with infinite proper time in both directions. Initially comoving nearby observers have physical separation proportional to , displaying de Sitter's tidal defocusing. Relative separation can initially decrease for other initial velocities; not every pair is monotonically separating.
For a nontrivial null geodesic, and . Hence the conformal infinities at occur at infinite affine parameter, despite their finite values of . For a spacelike geodesic, and . Over a full affine-length period , integrating gives a change . Thus the spacelike geodesics close on the usual cylinder. The special case is the equatorial circle . These closed spacelike curves do not threaten causality.
The geodesics of two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime instead conserve . Their norm equation gives
A future timelike geodesic has and
Its turning points are . Timelike geodesics oscillate rather than escaping to the spatial boundary. For , the central curve is geodesic. Integrating shows that a full proper-time period advances coordinate time by . They close on the periodically identified hyperboloid but remain complete nonclosed curves on the universal cover. Geodesics leaving reconverge at after proper time , illustrating AdS tidal focusing. A static observer at nonzero fixed is accelerated, not one of these oscillating free trajectories.
For AdS null geodesics, and . They approach either timelike conformal boundary at infinite affine parameter, while the coordinate-time travel from the centre is only . A spacelike geodesic has and connects the two spatial ends with infinite affine length. Both global models are geodesically complete. Reflecting a signal at the AdS conformal boundary is a choice of boundary condition for fields; it is not an automatic continuation of a geodesic at a finite affine endpoint.
For the complete de Sitter observer at , let be the shortest angular distance. An event at can send a signal reaching the observer at a finite future time exactly when
It can receive a signal sent by the observer at a finite past time exactly when . Equality gives the future and past observer horizons in two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime; their null branches are respectively and on the displayed cylinder. Their intersection is the central static patch, . All complete timelike geodesic observers have analogous horizons by de Sitter symmetry. These are observer-dependent cosmological horizons, not singularities of the global coordinates or Cauchy horizons.
In contrast, the complete central AdS observer can exchange signals with every event at finite : the conformal distance is finite and the observer exists for all . Its static Killing vector has squared norm everywhere. Thus global AdS on its cover has no cosmological event horizon for this observer, although other restricted patches or accelerated observers can have horizons.
The causal predictability distinction is also important. Global de Sitter is globally hyperbolic: constant- circles are Cauchy surfaces. A causal curve is monotone in and satisfies ; if it ended at finite , compactness of the spatial circle would allow an endpoint and extension. Hence an inextendible causal curve crosses every such slice once. AdS on the cover has no closed timelike curves, but it is not globally hyperbolic. For two central events at and , with , their causal diamond contains events at and arbitrarily large , so it is not compact. Initial data alone do not determine field evolution without conditions at the timelike conformal boundaries. de Sitter has spacelike conformal infinities and cosmological observer horizons; covered AdS has timelike conformal infinities and requires boundary data. The distinction between the AdS quadric and its universal cover is also explained in David Tong's general relativity lectures.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact