Put $Q=G/H$ and write $M^H$ for the invariant submodule. The five-term exact sequence in group cohomology associated with the Lyndon–Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence isThe inflation map in group cohomology composes a cocycle on $Q$ with the quotient homomorphism $G\to Q$. The restriction map in group cohomology restricts a cocycle from $G$ to $H$. The quotient action on the middle term is, for $q=gH$ and a one-cocycle $f$,This is independent of the lift and of the representative at the level of cohomology. Finally, the transgression in group cohomology extends a $Q$-invariant class on $H$ to a one-cochain on $G$; its coboundary is $H$-basic and descends to the two-cocycle on $Q$ representing $d_2[f]$. Changing the extension changes that cocycle by a group coboundary.

For the application, choose free generators $x_1,\dots ,x_n$ of $F$ and normal generators $r_1,\dots ,r_n$ of $R$. Since a finite nonabelian simple group $K$ is a perfect group, its abelianization is zero. The five-term sequence for $1\to R\to F\to K\to 1$ with trivial coefficients containsThe first term is zero because $K$ is finite, and the last term is zero because a free group has cohomological dimension one. It remains to prove that restriction is surjective.

The invariant submodule of homomorphisms $R\to \mathbb{Z}$ is exactlyThe images of the relators $r_1,\dots ,r_n$ generate $R/[F,R]$, so such a homomorphism $\lambda$ is determined by the integer vector $b=(\lambda (r_1),\dots ,\lambda (r_n){)}^T$. Let $A$ be the relator exponent-sum matrix. This square integer matrix presents $K^{\mathrm{ab}}$, which is zero, so $A$ is a unimodular matrix. There is therefore an integer vector $v$ satisfying $Av=b$. Define $\psi :F\to \mathbb{Z}$ by assigning to $x_i$ the $i$th entry of $v$. The definition of $A$ gives $\psi (r_j)=\lambda (r_j)$ for every $j$. Since the relator images generate $R/[F,R]$, the restriction of $\psi$ to $R$ equals $\lambda$. Restriction is surjective, exactness now gives

For $a,b\in I$, the square-zero ideal condition givesThus the square-zero unit subgroup $1+I$ is abelian, andis a group isomorphism from the additive group of $I$.

Use the specified ring isomorphism $R/I\cong \mathbb{Z}G$. For $x\in \mathbb{Z}G$, choose a lift $r\in R$ and define $x\cdot a=ra$ for $a\in I$. Two lifts differ by an element of $I$, whose product with $a$ vanishes, so this is well defined. Right multiplication is handled identically. The two actions commute by associativity, making $I$ a bimodule. If $u\in R$ lifts $g\in G$, then $u$ is a unit: a lift $v$ of $g^{-1}$ makes both $uv$ and $vu$ elements of $1+I$, hence units, and a ring element with both a left and a right inverse is invertible. Conjugation therefore definesChanging $u$ by an element of $I$ does not change this expression because $I^2=0$. Moreover,so $a\mapsto 1+a$ is an isomorphism of $\mathbb{Z}G$-modules for these conjugation actions.

Let $R^{\times }\to (R/I{)}^{\times }$ be reduction on unit groups, and define $U$ as the inverse image of the distinguished subgroup $G\subseteq (\mathbb{Z}G{)}^{\times }$. Every $g\in G$ has a unit lift by the preceding argument, and the kernel consists exactly of the units congruent to $1$, namely $1+I$. Multiplication in $R$ therefore gives the group extensionChoose a set-theoretic section $s:G\to U$ with $s(1)=1$. Its extension cocyclesatisfies the two-cocycle identity by associativity. A different section changes $c$ by a group coboundary, so second group cohomology classifies group extensions gives a well-defined classThe same construction for $(R_1,I_1)$ gives $U_1$, an extension cocycle $c_1$, and $x_1=[c_1]\in H^2(G,1+I_1)$.

The answer to the final question is no. An abstract ring isomorphism $R_1\cong R$ need not carry the distinguished ideal $I_1$ to $I$, need not induce the identity under the two chosen identifications of the quotient rings with $\mathbb{Z}G$, and need not induce the prescribed $\mathbb{Z}G$-module isomorphism $\theta$. Hence it need not give an isomorphism of the two displayed group extensions, so it imposes no equality $\varphi (x_1)=x$. That equality does hold if the ring isomorphism has all three compatibility properties, because it then carries one extension cocycle to the other up to a group coboundary.

The Schur multiplier of a group $G$ isthe second group homology group with trivial integral coefficients. If $G\cong F/R$ is a free presentation, Hopf's formula states that

Write $I_F=\ker (\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z})$ for the augmentation ideal. The presentation relation sequence iswhere $r[R,R]\mapsto 1\otimes (r-1)$. If $F$ is free on a set $S$, then $I_F$ is free as a left $\mathbb{Z}F$-module on the elements $s-1$, so the two modules immediately preceding $\mathbb{Z}$ are free $\mathbb{Z}G$-modules. Resolving the relation module $R/[R,R]$ by free modules and splicing produces a free resolution of $\mathbb{Z}$.

Apply the right-exact functor $\mathbb{Z}{\otimes }_{\mathbb{Z}G}-$ to this partial resolution. Its degree-two homology is the kernel ofThe coinvariant module on the left is $R/[F,R]$. On the right, the map $f-1\mapsto f[F,F]$ identifies the coinvariants with the abelianization $F/[F,F]$. The displayed map is induced by the inclusion $R\hookrightarrow F$, so its kernel isThis proves Hopf's formula.

For an abelian group $A$, the Schur multiplier of an abelian group is $M(A)\cong {\bigwedge }^{2}A$. One way to see the direct-sum rule is the degree-two Künneth theorem:A cyclic group has zero second integral group homology, whileConsequently

Let $P_{\bullet }\to \mathbb{Z}$ be a projective resolution of the trivial $\mathbb{Z}G$-module. The projective-resolution definition of group cohomology isThis is independent, up to a natural isomorphism, of the chosen projective resolution.

The degreewise natural isomorphismscommute with the coboundary maps. Taking cohomology proves that group cohomology commutes with finite direct sums:

Now restrict $P_{\bullet }$ from $G$ to a subgroup $K$. The group ring $\mathbb{Z}G$ is free as a $\mathbb{Z}K$-module, so restriction carries free modules to free modules and projective modules to projective modules. Thus the restricted complex is a projective resolution of the trivial $\mathbb{Z}K$-module. For the coinduced module $Y={\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{Z}K}(\mathbb{Z}G,X)$, the Hom functor adjunction for a coinduced module gives an isomorphism of cochain complexesExplicitly, a map $F$ is sent to $p\mapsto F(p)(1)$; the inverse sends a $\mathbb{Z}K$-linear map $a$ to $p\mapsto (r\mapsto a(rp))$. Taking cohomology proves Shapiro's lemma:

For the conjugation module of a group ring $N=\mathbb{Z}{G}_{\mathrm{conj}}$, the basis $G$ is the disjoint union of its conjugacy classes. Hence $N$ is the direct sum of the integral permutation modules on those classes. The class of a representative $g_i$ is the transitive $G$-set $G/C_G(g_i)$, where $C_G(g_i)$ is its centralizer. Since $G$ is finite, this permutation module is both induced and coinduced from the trivial $C_G(g_i)$-module $\mathbb{Z}$. Applying group cohomology commutes with finite direct sums and Shapiro's lemma yields the group cohomology of a conjugation module:

The symmetric group $S_3$ has three conjugacy classes, represented by the identity, a transposition, and a three-cycle. Their centralizers are respectivelyFor any finite group $L$ acting trivially on $\mathbb{Z}$,because a group homomorphism sends an element of finite order to an element of finite order, while the additive group of the integers contains no nonzero torsion elements. ThereforeThe periodic resolution of a finite cyclic group alternates the maps $t-1$ and $1+t+\cdots +t^{m-1}$. After applying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{Z}{C}_m}(-,\mathbb{Z})$ with the trivial action, these become alternately zero and multiplication by $m$, provingCombining this calculation with the supplied $H^2(S_3,\mathbb{Z})\cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ gives

Moser's trick states that if $M$ is compact and ${\omega }_t$, $0\le t\le 1$, is a smooth family of symplectic forms whose de Rham cohomology class is independent of $t$, then there is an isotopy ${\varphi }_t$ withSince $[{\dot{\omega }}_t]=0$, choose a smooth family of one-forms ${\sigma }_t$ with ${\dot{\omega }}_t=d{\sigma }_t$. Nondegeneracy of ${\omega }_t$ uniquely determines a vector field $X_t$ byCompactness makes its flow ${\varphi }_t$ exist for the whole interval. Cartan's magic formula and $d{\omega }_t=0$ givewhich proves the theorem.

Smooth degree-$d$ hypersurfaces form the complement of the discriminant in the projective space of degree-$d$ homogeneous polynomials. This complement is path connected, so $X$ and $X^{\prime }$ lie in a smooth one-parameter family. The Ehresmann fibration theorem identifies the fibers smoothly. Under such an identification, the restrictions of the Fubini-Study form form a family ${\omega }_t$ whose cohomology class is the fixed restricted hyperplane class. Moser's trick therefore gives the symplectic equivalence of smooth projective hypersurfaces.

It remains to construct the finite subgroup for one convenient hypersurface. On the Fermat hypersurfacethe group $({\mu }_d{)}^{n+1}$ acts by diagonal coordinate multiplication. It preserves both $X_F$ and the Fubini-Study form. The kernel of its projective action is the diagonal subgroup ${\mu }_d$, so the effective Fermat hypersurface diagonal symmetry group isConjugating this action by a symplectomorphism $X_F\to X$ gives the required subgroup of $\mathrm{Symp}(X,{\omega }_{FS}{|}_X)$.