An interferometer combines waves from two or more paths to measure their interference.

The wave phase of a complex Fourier transform as a function of frequency.

Scalar diffraction theory approximates light by one complex field satisfying a scalar wave equation. Aperture propagation is represented by an integral of secondary contributions, with vector polarization of waves and detailed electromagnetic edge conditions suppressed. The approximation is useful for many apertures large compared with wavelength, but is not an exact substitute for Maxwell equations at arbitrary apertures.

The Huygens-Fresnel principle describes propagation by coherent addition of secondary-wave contributions from a wavefront or aperture. Their complex amplitudes, including relative wave phases, must be summed before calculating light intensity. The Fresnel propagator follows by retaining quadratic propagation wave phase in the paraxial approximation.

BOOMERANG's 1998 Antarctic balloon flight scanned a low-dust region with a microwave telescope near $38\mathrm{km}$ and bolometers at $0.3\mathrm{K}$. Ground beam measurements and microwave angular dipole calibration connected signals to sky temperature. Frequency-map and time-split differences tested contamination. The 2000 paper fitted the Cosmic microwave background power spectrum, finding ${\ell }_{\mathrm{peak}}=197\pm 6$ at one standard deviation. Its near-flat-geometry inference used a chosen model family and parameter priors; secondary peaks were not yet established.^[ref]

The angular sound horizon compares two lengths using the same distance convention. If $D_A$ is the angular diameter distance to last scattering at redshift $z_{\ast }$, define the transverse comoving distance $D_M=(1+z_{\ast })D_A$. A comoving sound horizon $r_s$ has proper length $r_s/(1+z_{\ast })$ at emission, so its angular size is ${\theta }_{\ast }=r_s/D_M$. Mixing a comoving ruler with $D_A$ would introduce an erroneous factor $1+z_{\ast }$. In a curved FLRW metric, $D_M$ is generally different from the radial comoving distance.

For a stipulated example, $r_s=144\mathrm{Mpc}$ and $D_M=14000\mathrm{Mpc}$ give ${\theta }_{\ast }=0.010286$ radians, or $0.589^{\circ }$, and an acoustic scale ${\ell }_A=305.4$. Multiplying both lengths by $1.1$ gives $158.4\mathrm{Mpc}$ and $15400\mathrm{Mpc}$ with exactly the same ${\theta }_{\ast }$ and ${\ell }_A$. This example establishes a ratio degeneracy, without claiming that any arbitrary rescaling corresponds to an allowed cosmological model. Equivalently,Other observables are needed to separate changes that preserve the ratio.

The approximate adiabatic acoustic-peak spacing is ${\ell }_A$. The first observed temperature peak is shifted by gravitational driving and angular projection of density and Doppler acoustic sources; it need not occur at ${\ell }_A$. In particular, neither the illustrative $305.4$ nor the BOOMERANG acoustic-peak measurement of $197\pm 6$ should be substituted for the other.

The cosmological baryon density enters through the baryon loading parameter and cosmological recombination, changing relative acoustic amplitudes as well as the sound horizon. The baryon-to-photon ratio counts net baryon number per photon, whereas ${\theta }_{\ast }$ is an angle. Constraining cosmological baryon density requires the pattern of relative peak heights within a model, with other parameters fitted jointly. Big Bang nucleosynthesis provides a separate abundance test. Baryon-density consistency between nucleosynthesis and the microwave background is consequently a test of one common cosmic history, rather than two direct measurements of the same angle. A first peak by itself cannot determine every component of the cosmological density parameter or uniquely fix spatial curvature of an FLRW universe.

P. J. E. Peebles made the connection between microscopic processes and cosmological observables quantitative. His 1968 paper treated cosmological recombination as a kinetic problem. Capturing an Electron directly into the hydrogen ground state releases a photon that can ionize another atom. Net neutralization depends on escape of resonance radiation through cosmological redshift and on two-photon spontaneous emission from the $2s$ state. An equilibrium Saha equation alone does not give that history.^[ref]

This matters for an acoustic prediction because the hydrogen ionization fraction fixes the supply of free Electrons for Thomson scattering. In physical units the scattering rate per photon is ${\Gamma }_T=n_e{\sigma }_{T}c$. The cosmological visibility function describes the distribution of last-scattering times. Thus atomic physics helps determine when the photon-baryon acoustic oscillator is read out, as well as how rapidly tight coupling fails.

In 1970 P. J. E. Peebles and J. T. Yu followed adiabatic cosmological perturbations by numerically integrating the photon collision equation through cosmological recombination. Their calculation connected acoustic evolution and dissipation to residual matter structure and microwave brightness fluctuations. It did not assume that a perfect photon-baryon fluid remained valid throughout last scattering. Their illustrative cosmological models and normalization were historical choices, rather than the present Lambda-CDM model; their predicted brightness variance versus angular resolution should not be relabelled as a modern measured $C_{\ell }$ spectrum.^[ref]

The continuing idea is a forward prediction: specify initial conditions, evolve the coupled matter and radiation, project onto the sky, and compare the result with an instrument's readout. Coherent initial phases are needed for acoustic variance peaks explains why a collection of oscillating modes does not automatically produce a peaked power spectrum. The BOOMERANG acoustic-peak measurement provides a later observational test of this physical programme.

The energy carried by one photon is proportional to its frequency $\nu$, with proportionality constant the Planck constant $h$. The equivalent forms use angular frequency $\omega =2\pi \nu$ and vacuum wavelength $\lambda =c/\nu$. Different observers can measure different photon energies because they measure different frequencies; the photon remains massless. In signature $(+---)$, an observer with four-velocity $u^{\mu }$ measures $E=p_{\mu }{u}^{\mu }$, where $p^{\mu }$ is the photon's four-momentum and $u^{\mu }{u}_{\mu }=c^2$.

A single-photon source prepares light with strongly suppressed simultaneous two-photon emission. One useful implementation repeatedly excites one discrete emitter and collects a selected radiative transition. Photon antibunching, measured through the zero-delay second-order correlation $g^{(2)}(0)$, tests the multiphoton suppression; a weak coherent beam retains Poissonian number fluctuations. Collection efficiency and multiphoton probability are distinct properties.

An Electron ejected following photon absorption. For a free residual ion with negligible recoil, the emitted electron's kinetic energy equals incident photon energy minus the ionization binding energy.