If , part (iii) makes trivial. Pulling it back along gives
Taking , , and , where is inversion, gives
Induction with and proves for ; combining this with inversion proves
Conversely, suppose . For , part (ii) gives , so the result just proved yields . On the other hand,
whereas gives . Hence is trivial for every , so is trivial and . The torsion-freeness proved in part (ii) now implies
Let
If , then its restriction to is , up to a constant one-dimensional factor, and is therefore trivial. Its restriction to is also trivial. The Seesaw theorem now implies that is trivial on .
Conversely, if is trivial, restricting it to shows that is trivial for every . Thus
For a line bundle on , define the homomorphism associated to a line bundle on an abelian variety
The Theorem of the square gives
so is a homomorphism. Pullback distributes over the tensor product of sheaves, and therefore
Iterating the homomorphism law in gives
Suppose . Then is trivial for every . The multiplication-by-n morphism on an abelian variety is surjective, so is trivial and . Thus the Néron-Severi group
is torsion-free.
Finally, put . For every ,
which is trivial by the Theorem of the square. Hence
The Theorem of the square says that for an abelian variety , a line bundle , and ,
where denotes translation by .
One form of the Mumford rigidity lemma says that if is a complete variety, is connected, and a morphism maps to one point, then factors through the projection to . In particular, if also maps to that point, then is constant.
Choose and put . To see that the pointed morphism is a homomorphism, apply rigidity to
It vanishes on , so it factors through the second projection; it also vanishes on , so it is identically zero. Now define
Then for every and for every . Rigidity forces to be identically , so
A group scheme over is a -scheme with multiplication , identity , and inversion satisfying the group axioms as identities of morphisms. A homomorphism of group schemes is a -morphism satisfying
and it then preserves the identity and inversion.
Assume and are commutative. The group has pointwise addition
For every -algebra and ,
where commutativity permits the middle terms to be reordered. Hence is a homomorphism. The zero morphism and pointwise inverse are also homomorphisms, so is a subgroup of . The definition immediately gives
Repeated pointwise addition gives . Since is a group homomorphism,
The Yoneda lemma turns equality on all -valued points into equality of morphisms, proving
Take an affine open subscheme . Properness and flatness survive base change, and is reduced because is reduced. A bounded complex of finite locally free modules computes the cohomology of on .
If some were nonzero, choose the largest such . All groups above degree would vanish, while every fiber group in degree vanishes by hypothesis. Part (iii) would force , a contradiction. Hence
for every affine and every . These groups compute the sections of the higher direct images over affine opens, so for all , including when . The Leray spectral sequence now gives
The finite complex computing cohomology in a proper flat family gives a bounded complex of finite locally free -modules such that, for every -module ,
In particular, computes and computes .
Since for , the finite exact tail above degree can be split successively: its last differential is surjective onto a projective module, hence splits, and induction moves left. Removing the resulting contractible summands leaves a finite locally free complex ending in degree . Therefore
and after tensoring with the same formula computes the fiber cohomology.
If , the last differential is surjective, and remains so after every base change; hence every vanishes. Conversely, if all fiber groups vanish, the finitely generated cokernel satisfies for every . Localizing and applying Nakayama lemma gives for every , so . Thus
For , the Mayer-Vietoris sequence for sheaf cohomology is the long exact sequence
We prove the required vanishing by induction on the number of open sets. The case is an assumption. Put and . The induction hypothesis gives for every . The intersections cover , and every nonempty finite intersection among them is one of the intersections in the hypothesis, so the same induction gives . We also have . Exactness of the Mayer-Vietoris sequence now yields
For an affine morphism and a quasi-coherent sheaf , every inverse image of an affine open is affine. Higher cohomology of a quasi-coherent sheaf on an affine scheme vanishes, so
The Leray spectral sequence therefore has only its zeroth row, and its edge maps give
A morphism of schemes is a flat morphism when every local-ring map makes a flat module.
In (i), the coordinate map is , , and
It is therefore a free module of rank two and the morphism is flat, including in characteristic two.
In (ii), is finite over the cusp ring and has generic rank one. Were it flat, finite flatness over the local ring at the cusp would make it free of rank one. Its fiber there is instead
which has dimension two, so this morphism is not flat.
In (iii), the base coordinate acts as , and the nonzero element satisfies . Thus the coordinate ring has torsion as a -module. Since is a principal ideal domain and a module over it is flat exactly when it is torsion-free, this morphism is not flat. Consequently
For a ring homomorphism , the Module of Kähler differentials is the -module generated by symbols , subject to
Equivalently, it represents -linear derivations:
For , the Transitivity exact sequence for Kähler differentials is
If is surjective, the Conormal exact sequence for Kähler differentials is
Let be a finite field extension. By the primitive element theorem, its maximal separable field extension is simple, and transitivity reduces the calculation to a simple algebraic extension. If with minimal polynomial , then
Thus a separable simple extension has zero differentials. Conversely, if is not separable, the purely inseparable part has a generator whose minimal polynomial has zero formal derivative in positive characteristic, producing a nonzero differential. Hence
Now let . If , , and , then the minimal polynomial is and has zero derivative, so
If , where , , and , then . Both defining equations have zero derivative, and
  • In (i), and relative to , so
If , this is and its support is the origin . If , it is free of rank one and its support is all of .
  • In (ii), and vanish relatively, whence
Its support is the origin in every characteristic; the module is unless , when it is .
  • In (iii), and give
Its support is the entire component .
The three-isogeny descent connecting map, identified through the Weil pairing with , is
The long exact sequence attached to makes it a group homomorphism with
The function from part (b) gives the explicit formula
At , the value is the leading coefficient of relative to the local parameter , since gives . At the ordinary formula gives , whose class is the inverse of because is a cube.
Let be the primes dividing . For a prime , use
If , then is an -adic unit, so . If , then , so . In either case is divisible by three; the special values at and have the same property. Therefore
When , this power-class group is trivial: a rational number whose valuation at every prime is divisible by three is a cube up to sign, and . Thus is trivial, its kernel is all of , and
The principal divisor criterion on an elliptic curve says that is principal exactly when and .
On , take
The line meets the cubic three times at , while has a triple pole at the point at infinity. Hence
With , part (a) gives
Taking divisors and cancelling the factor three yields
Pullback on degree-zero divisor classes is the dual isogeny, so the pulled-back class is represented by . It is principal, and therefore
An isogeny of elliptic curves is a nonconstant morphism preserving identity points; it is automatically a finite surjective group homomorphism. On the affine chart , put
The equation of is , and the proposed map is
It lands on because
The rational formulas extend across to a morphism sending to . It is nonconstant, hence an isogeny. On function fields, satisfies , so the degree is at most three; generically the three cube roots give three distinct preimages. Equivalently, the points with form its three-element geometric kernel. Therefore
For a reduced rational number with , the height of a rational number is
Condition (i) holds because only finitely many coprime integer pairs have bounded maximum.
Condition (iii) also holds. The standard height inequality
gives
Condition (ii) fails: for positive integers ,
whose absolute value is unbounded. Thus precisely conditions hold. This is consistent with although the additive group is not finitely generated.
If is finitely generated, the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain immediately makes finite.
Conversely, first replace the given height by a quadratic one. Set
Condition (ii) makes this limit converge and gives
Thus still has finite bounded subsets. Condition (i) also gives a global lower bound for , so . Applying condition (iii) to , dividing by and passing to the limit gives one direction of the parallelogram identity. Applying the same inequality to and , and using , gives the reverse direction. Hence
and induction yields for every integer .
Now suppose is finite and choose representatives . Put . For any , write . Nonnegativity and the parallelogram identity give
so, since ,
Repeated division modulo therefore reaches the finite set . Reversing the recursion expresses every element of using and the finitely many . This is the height descent lemma, and proves
The natural map
has finite image by hypothesis. It remains to bound its kernel. If becomes for , then
is a one-cocycle for . Changing by an -torsion point changes this cocycle by a coboundary, producing a well-defined map from the kernel to
If its cohomology class is zero, subtracting the corresponding torsion point from makes Galois fixed, so . The map is therefore injective. Both and are finite, so this group cohomology set is finite. A finite kernel and finite image give
An integral Weierstrass equation has good reduction outside the finitely many primes dividing its nonzero discriminant. This proves finiteness of the set of bad primes. To prove finiteness of rational torsion, choose two distinct good primes. The reduction of torsion points on an elliptic curve injects each primary component at a good prime of different residue characteristic, so the two finite reduced point groups bound every primary component of .
For
the displayed equation is minimal and
Its bad primes are therefore exactly
The good reductions at and have
Their coprime orders exclude every rational torsion primary component, including the residue-characteristic components by using the other prime. Hence
For a minimal integral Weierstrass equation, let be the reduced cubic and its nonsingular points, with their induced group law. Define the filtration of elliptic-curve points over a local field by
and
The parameter identifies with the formal group of an elliptic curve on . Part (a) therefore gives . Reduction restricts to the exact sequence
Its restriction to -torsion has trivial kernel, yielding the injection

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact