{c}

* You don't get any/sufficient recognition for your contributions
* The stuff you wrote can be deleted anytime by some random admin/opposing editor
* Scope too limited, and politics defined. Everything has to sound encyclopedic and be notable enough. This basically excludes completely good tutorials.
* Insane impossible to use <markup language>-base talk pages instead of issue trackers?! Ridiculous!!! That change alone could make Wikipedia so much more amazing. Wikipedia could become a Stack Exchange killer by doing that alone + some basic reputation system. Some work on that is being done at: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:DiscussionTools[], already in Beta as of 2022.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isomorphism_theorems&oldid=976843241[This edit] perfectly summarizes how Ciro feels about Wikipedia (no particular hate towards that user, he was a teacher at the prestigious <Pierre and Marie Curie University> and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazard[actually as a wiki page about him]):
\Q[rm a cryptic diagram (not understandable by a professional mathematician, without further explanations]
which removed the only diagram that was actually understandable to non-Mathematicians, which <Ciro Santilli> had created, and received many upvotes at: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/776039/intuition-behind-normal-subgroups/3732426#3732426[]. The removal does not generate any notifications to you unless you follow the page which would lead to infinite noise, and is extremely difficult to find out how to contact the other person. The removal justification is even somewhat <ad hominem>: how does he know <Ciro Santilli> is also not a professional Mathematician? :-) Maybe it is obvious because <there is value in tutorials written by beginners>[Ciro explains in a way that is understandable]. Also removal makes no effort to contact original author. Of course, this is caused by the fact that there must also have been a bunch of useless edits not done by Ciro, and there is no reputation system to see if you should ignore a person or not immediately, so removal author has no patience anymore. This is what makes it impossible to contribute to Wikipedia: your stuff gets deleted at any time, and you don't know how to appeal it. Ciro is going to regret having written this rant after Daniel replies and shows the diagram is crap. But that would be better than not getting a reply and not learning that the diagram is crap.

Another one: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Finite_field&type=revision&diff=1044934168&oldid=1044905041 on <finite fields> with edit comment "Obviously: X ≡ α". Discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Finite_field#Concrete_simple_worked_out_example Some people simply don't know how to explain things to beginners, or don't think Wikipedia is where it should be done. One simply can't waste time fighting off those people, writing good tutorials is hard enough in itself without that fight.

It is also for this reason why Ciro basically only contributes images to Wikipedia: because they are either all in or all out, and you can determine which one of them it is. And this allows images to be more attributable, so people can actually see that it was Ciro that created a given amazing image.

Wikipedia is perfect for things like biographies, geography, or history, which have a much more defined and subjective expository order. But when it comes to "tutorials of how to actually do stuff", which is what <mathematics> and <physics> are basically about, Wikipedia has a very hard time to go beyond dry definitions which are only useful for people who already half know the stuff. But to learn from zero, newbies need tutorials with intuition and examples.

Even information about companies can be disputed. E.g. once <Ciro Santilli> tried to create a page for <PsiQuantum>, a startup with \$650m in funding, and there was a deletion proposal because it did not contain verifiable sources not linked directly to information provided by the company itself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PsiQuantum Although this argument is correct, it is also true about 90% of everything that is on Wikipedia about any company. Where else can you get any information about a <B2B> company? Their clients are not going to say anything. Lawsuites and scandals are kind of the only possible source... Although it was initially overruled, this goes to show how it is to decide, and you may always waste your time writing something that is about to be deleted. This type of endless
\Q[should we delete this extremely likely useful/correct content or not according to this extremely complex system of guidelines"] is very similar to <Stack Exchange>'s own <Stack Overflow content deletion> issues. <Ain't Nobody Got Time For That>. "Ain't Nobody Got Time for That" actually has a Wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ain%27t_Nobody_Got_Time_for_That[]. That's notable. Unlike a \$600M+ company of course.

Wikipedia

"You don't get any recognition for your contributions". A new wiki system, like Golden.com (https://golden.com/profile/hiro-mitsuki) is trying to fix this issue.



Golden

Bitcoin 

Give some to me, Satoshi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


How many bitcoins do you own???

I am a highschool student that tend to learn real math & physics. At the same time I try to improve my social skills. I gonna post materials that I write in my free time and my writings about science stuff, if God wills.


First

Hello effendy! Welcome to the site. If you ever want to share an article you created, or need help understanding something, just leave a comment here and we'll see it! What area of maths/physics have you been most interested in lately?


Welcome to OurBigBook!!!

Index

This thing now sends emails BTW. Hurray.

Test data

And another

{title2=三西猴的主页}

Check out: https://OurBigBook.com[]. Mission: to live in a world where you can learn <university>-level <mathematics>, <physics>, <chemistry>, <biology> and <engineering> from perfect free open source books that anyone can write to get famous.

Further information: <OurBigBook.com>{full}. <sponsor>[Sponsor Ciro] at https://github.com/sponsors/cirosantilli[] starting from 1<Dollar>[[$]]/month so he can work full time to bring hardcore <university>-level <STEM> education to all ages.

https://github.com/cirosantilli[GitHub] |
https://stackoverflow.com/users/895245[Stack Overflow] |
https://www.linkedin.com/in/cirosantilli[LinkedIn] |
https://www.youtube.com/c/CiroSantilli[YouTube] |
https://twitter.com/cirosantilli[Twitter] |
https://www.zhihu.com/people/cirosantilli/activities[Zhihu 知乎] |
https://www.weibo.com/p/1005055601627311[Weibo 微博] |
<accounts>[Other accounts]

Let's <the ideal university>[create an educational system] with:
* no distinction between university and high school, <students must have a flexible choice of what to learn>[students just go as fast as they can to what they really want] without stupid <university entry exams>
* <OurBigBook.com>[fully open source learning material]
* <exam as a service>[on-demand examinations that anyone can easily take without prerequisites]
* <the only reason for universities to exist should be the laboratories>[granular entry selection only for space in specific laboratories] or participation in specific <novel research> projects

<Ciro Santilli> is a <free gifted education> and <Ciro Santilli's campaign for freedom of speech in China>[freedom of speech] <slacktivist>. <effortless effort>[Passion] for the <natural sciences>, <education> and <computers>. <Ciro Santilli's cycling>[Recreational cyclist]. <Tax the rich>. Opinions are his own, but they could be yours too.

<Ciro Santilli's website>[This website] is written in <OurBigBook Markup>, its <source code> is located at: https://github.com/cirosantilli/cirosantilli.github.io[], and it is <licensed> under <CC BY-SA> 4.0 unless otherwise noted. To contact Ciro, see: <contact>{full}.

\image[https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cirosantilli/media/master/ID_photo_of_Ciro_Santilli_taken_in_2013.jpg]{height=300}
\image[https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cirosantilli/media/master/Ciro_Santilli's_learn_teach_apply_logo.png]{height=300}

I'm your huge fan, Ciro

I can not join your movement because I really have more reasons than other ones. For privacy, I can't explain that. And, For me, I know that for the current situations in China, I can't do anything. For China, I think only solution is revolution not reform. The protesters will die with nobody know that without tech. People could try, but it is a Way of Sacrifice.


https://space.bilibili.com/355027238/dynamic
https://chinadigitaltimes.net/chinese/667881.html

According the report, this organization help programthink arrested. I research that for some days, and the evidences express its correctness.


净网志愿者协会, may one day you will be captured by them. But you are foreigner, they don't have a way to do that.


净网志愿者协会, it is a semi-official organization but with high-tech hacker technology. You know, in China, high-tech hackers will not be an offical. Because it is a semi-official organization with many young  little-pink engineer, the tracking for programthink, it could be done.


They are actually not wumao, but they may be more formidable opponent. But you live aboard, they can't do anything and officals will not always listen their views.


Why do I think its claim for programthink's arrest is credible? Because some inference.
The organization says programthink is 马勇康.
https://github.com/programthink/zhao/issues/418


one year passed, 2022/05, offical media(only media) say 马某某，煽动分裂国家、煽动颠覆国家政权
https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1731886110528251526&wfr=spider&for=pc


the 马 first name only has 1% population in China. Coincidence? And according the report's keyword: 浙江温州, 科技有限公司，“洗脑”，“人生导师”，顽固


just like a copycat keyword for programthink blog and it conforms characteristics.


and the organization say 马勇康 is 山东人, the offical media say he is 浙江人


According the data in the website or anywhere:
https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/library-surname/5f34ee9eff5a3344d6a8aabe


浙江(ZheJiang province) have less 马 than 山东.
And programthink family's post say programthink lastly has a business travel to a city in eastern China, you see 温州，浙江，上海，all keyword is about the eastern China. 温州 is a interesting keyword, if you search programthink's issues, it has a strange 温州 people, but no other Zhejiang province's county.


And other crime such as 政治纲领, as I know for CCP cop, they need some more outstanding achievement. 继续调查中，because the CCP cop needs more news by the mouth even it is not neutral. And, it is possible that programthink think he could take the all blames on his shoulder maybe. 


These inference may is only inference by brain ———— we never know what is a truth.


https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV14S4y1T7RT/?spm_id_from=333.999.0.0
净网志愿者协会 mentions programthink in the video.


I only know that they may be the not many real high-tech little-pink and hackers and really can do that. They are more terrible cop, even sometimes, gov will not listen them. I don't know in 2022 the organizations like it will do what.


Sometimes I think what is better? For my reasons I know I couldn't join yours. And I can't keep "doublethink"(ps: I'm not an official, official never doublethink). The only difference between China and 1984 may is the war is peace. China gov officials say China love peace, and in fact, CCP indeed take less war than other countries. But it is Chinese nature, may CCP also keep something.


CCP is not worse like Russia, so it is more difficult, for any reform. And reform may not work too fast or really work, only revolution.

About Programthink

You're a hero my friend

This is a section about Vector space!

Vector space is a very important subject about which there is a lot to say.

For example, this sentence. And then another one.


Vector space

The code <code>f(x) + 1</code> should be <code>f(x) + 2</code>

The code `f(x) + 1` should be `f(x) + 2`

This is a section about Abstract algebra!

Abstract algebra is a very important subject about which there is a lot to say.

For example, this sentence. And then another one.


Abstract algebra

I can't believe you got such a basic fact wrong!

1+1<svg width='400em' height='1.08em' viewBox='0 0 400000 1080' preserveAspectRatio='xMinYMin slice'><path d='M95,702
c-2.7,0,-7.17,-2.7,-13.5,-8c-5.8,-5.3,-9.5,-10,-9.5,-14
c0,-2,0.3,-3.3,1,-4c1.3,-2.7,23.83,-20.7,67.5,-54
c44.2,-33.3,65.8,-50.3,66.5,-51c1.3,-1.3,3,-2,5,-2c4.7,0,8.7,3.3,12,10
s173,378,173,378c0.7,0,35.3,-71,104,-213c68.7,-142,137.5,-285,206.5,-429
c69,-144,104.5,-217.7,106.5,-221
l0 -0
c5.3,-9.3,12,-14,20,-14
H400000v40H845.2724
s-225.272,467,-225.272,467s-235,486,-235,486c-2.7,4.7,-9,7,-19,7
c-6,0,-10,-1,-12,-3s-194,-422,-194,-422s-65,47,-65,47z
M834 80h400000v40h-400000z'/></svg>​=3, not 2 as mentioned

$\sqrt{1 + 1} = 3$, not 2 as mentioned

Hi Dmitri,

Thanks for trying out the website.

As you can see, there are absolutely no anti-vote fraud mechanisms at this point.

The plan is to just start out simply manually taking down obvious stuff, until there are users. Which might never happen.

If one day there are ever any users, the dream would be a PageRank-like algorithm with per user per tag weights: https://cirosantilli.com/ourbigbook-com#pagerank-like-ranking But that is a very very far dream.

BTW, how did you get so many gmail addresses? Do you just have a cell phone farm? Or is it from before the days that phone verification became mandatory? Edit: the gmails are all down according to gmail auto-reply. So perhaps Dmitri just created an account, verified, and then deleted it, and created a new one manually? But that would requirea lot of patience!

I should also mention that we welcome vote fraud experimentation, especially when there will be more content. Unlike Stack Overflow: https://github.com/cirosantilli/stack-overflow-vote-fraud-script

All best


Hello from OurBigBook

The fundamental theorem of calculus is very important to understanding this subject.

I would add something like:
\Q[
The reason why the superconductor laser is blue, is due to the integral of its resonance modes.

From the fundamental theorem of calculus, we understand that this is because the derivative of the temperature is too small.
]

== Also mentions Newton's rule

As an added bonus, a mention of Newton's rule would also be very useful.


Add mention of the fundamental theorem of calculus

There's a typo in this article at "mathmatcs"

Link to article: <test data>

Link to ID in this issue: <test issue 2>

== Test issue 2

=== Test issue 3

== Test child

Conflict resolution between issue IDs and article IDs:

* to issue: <test child>
* to article: </test child>

Test issue

This is a section about Linear algebra!

Linear algebra is a very important subject about which there is a lot to say.

For example, this sentence. And then another one.


# id	Title	Author	Comments	Created	Updated
cirosantilli/ourbigbook-com/wikipedia#1	Golden	rtnf 1	1	2022-11-29	2023-05-28
satoshi/bitcoin#1	How many bitcoins do you own???	Ciro Santilli 25	0	2023-02-12	2023-02-15
effendy0/first#1	Welcome to OurBigBook!!!	OurBigBook Admin 0	2	2023-02-06	2023-02-15
markusheimerl#1	This thing now sends emails BTW. Hurray.	OurBigBook Admin 0	0	2023-01-29	2023-01-30
cirosantilli/test-data#2	And another	Barack Obama 11	0	2023-01-29	2023-02-15
cirosantilli/test-data#1	1	Ciro Santilli 25	0	2023-01-29	2023-02-15
cirosantilli#1	I'm your huge fan, Ciro	Barack Obama 11	0	2023-01-29	2023-02-12
anonymousajo1u12nglajgka/about-programthink#1	You're a hero my friend	Ciro Santilli 25	0	2022-11-21	2023-02-15
donald-trump/vector-space#3	The code `f(x) + 1` should be `f(x) + 2`	Donald Trump 29	3	2022-11-02	2023-02-15
donald-trump/abstract-algebra#3	$1 + 1 = 3$ , not 2 as mentioned	Donald Trump 29	1	2022-11-02	2023-01-29
vote-frau-love-demonrat#1	Hello from OurBigBook	OurBigBook Admin 0	0	2023-04-03	2023-04-03
donald-trump/vector-space#2	$1 + 1 = 3$ , not 2 as mentioned	Barack Obama 11	2	2022-11-02	2023-01-29
donald-trump/vector-space#1	Add mention of the fundamental theorem of calculus	Donald Trump 29	1	2022-11-02	2023-01-29
barack-obama/vector-space#2	There's a typo in this article at "mathmatcs"	Barack Obama 11	0	2022-11-02	2023-01-29
barack-obama/vector-space#1	Test issue	Donald Trump 29	3	2022-11-02	2023-01-29
donald-trump/linear-algebra#1	The code `f(x) + 1` should be `f(x) + 2`	Barack Obama 11	2	2022-11-02	2023-01-29
donald-trump/abstract-algebra#2	Add mention of the fundamental theorem of calculus	Barack Obama 11	0	2022-11-02	2023-01-29
donald-trump/abstract-algebra#1	There's a typo in this article at "mathmatcs"	Donald Trump 29	3	2022-11-02	2023-01-29
barack-obama/abstract-algebra#2	Test issue	Barack Obama 11	2	2022-11-02	2023-01-29
barack-obama/abstract-algebra#1	The code `f(x) + 1` should be `f(x) + 2`	Donald Trump 29	1	2022-11-02	2023-01-29