True. Every group of order four is Abelian: if it has an element of order four it is cyclic; otherwise every nonidentity element has order two and , while , so .
Over , the Maschke theorem and the Artin–Wedderburn theorem give
Since is Abelian, this algebra is commutative, forcing every . Its dimension is four, so . Each factor contributes one simple module; therefore there are exactly four up to isomorphism.
Let . This is nonzero since its basis coefficients are all one, and for every . Hence is a one-dimensional left ideal of .
If the regular module is semisimple, is a direct summand. Let be the corresponding -linear projection, so . Write for . Then
Because , in . Thus
Together with the Maschke theorem, this gives the exact semisimple algebra criterion for a group algebra.
A semisimple module is a direct sum of simple modules. A finite-dimensional semisimple algebra is one whose left regular module is semisimple; equivalently, all its finite-dimensional modules are semisimple, or every submodule of a finite-dimensional module has a complementary submodule.
The Maschke theorem states that, for a finite group and a field with in , every finite-dimensional -module is semisimple, so is a semisimple algebra. The assumption is equivalent to saying that the characteristic of a field does not divide . The averaging construction makes a projection onto a submodule equivariant by replacing with .
Given a group representation , define an action on by
It is bilinear. The identity acts as , and
because is a group homomorphism. Hence the product action agrees with successive action, proving the module axioms. Thus every group representation extends uniquely by linearity to a -module.
The group algebra is the vector space with basis , whose elements are formal sums with . Extend the group multiplication bilinearly:
This is an associative unital -algebra, with multiplicative identity the group identity, and .
The general Schur's lemma says that a homomorphism between simple modules over any unital ring is either zero or an isomorphism. Indeed, is a submodule of and is a submodule of . If , simplicity gives and . In particular, is a division ring.
For a complex algebra and a finite-dimensional simple module , the stronger conclusion is
For , the fundamental theorem of algebra gives an eigenvalue . The endomorphism has nonzero kernel, so the general Schur's lemma forces it to be zero. Consequently a homomorphism between two such simple modules is zero if they are nonisomorphic, and their homomorphism space is one-dimensional if they are isomorphic.
The finite-dimensional qualification is essential for this scalar conclusion. For example, the field is a complex algebra, simple as a module over itself, and its endomorphisms include multiplication by , which is not a complex scalar.
A composition series of a module is a finite chain
of submodules whose factors are simple modules. A finite-dimensional module has such a series by induction on its dimension, choosing a maximal proper submodule at each step.
The Jordan–Hölder theorem for modules states that any two composition series of a module have the same length and the same simple factors up to isomorphism and reordering. Thus the multiset of composition factors is an invariant of the module, even when the series itself is not unique.
A simple module is a nonzero module with no submodules other than zero and itself. Equivalently, every nonzero element generates the entire module: whenever .
The minimal polynomial factors over as with distinct roots. The diagonalizability criterion using the minimal polynomial therefore makes diagonalizable. Its characteristic polynomial gives multiplicities two, one and one, so its Jordan normal form is
up to reordering the one-dimensional Jordan blocks.
The first block is the companion matrix of . The last block is the companion matrix of . Since divides , these are the ordered invariant factors of a linear operator. Thus
The minimal polynomial is the largest invariant factor, and the characteristic polynomial is their product.
Give a -module structure by . A finite vector space basis generates it as a module. It is a torsion module: the Cayley-Hamilton theorem gives a nonzero polynomial annihilating all of . Since is a Euclidean domain, cyclic decomposition gives
with monic nonconstant invariant factors of a linear operator and no free summand. On , use the basis . Multiplication by then has the companion matrix , because the relation expresses the last power in terms of earlier ones. Concatenating these bases yields
the rational canonical form of . In particular, its minimal polynomial is and its characteristic polynomial is .
The structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain applies because every Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain. In its cyclic decomposition form, every finitely generated module has a decomposition
where the are nonzero nonunits. The nonnegative integer and the invariant factors of a finitely generated module are unique, with each determined up to multiplication by a unit. The zero module corresponds to no summands. Equivalently, factor the into powers of prime elements and use the Chinese remainder theorem to obtain a direct sum of cyclic prime-power torsion modules and a free summand.
An -module is a finitely generated module if there are such that every element of has the form with . Equivalently, , or is a quotient module of .
By Cauchy theorem for groups, choose of order and of order two. The subgroup has index two, hence is normal, and . Thus generate . Conjugation by has with and . Since is prime, or .
If , the two generators commute and has order , so is cyclic. If , then and . The two involutions generate , because . Hence is dihedral in the stated convention. Thus
where denotes the dihedral group of order . In both cases is a proper nontrivial normal subgroup, so is not simple.
By Lagrange's theorem, a nonidentity element in a group of order four has order two or four. In the latter case the group is cyclic. Otherwise every nonidentity element has order two, and while , so the group is Abelian. Choose distinct nonidentity elements . Their cyclic subgroups meet trivially and is the fourth element, so gives an isomorphism . Hence
No classification of finite Abelian groups is used.
The map partitions into disjoint two-element sets , so is even. Since is even, is even as well. This complement contains the identity and consists of elements with . It therefore contains at least one further element , and that element has order two. Thus every finite group of even order contains an involution, without using Cauchy theorem for groups.
For the Abelian case of Cauchy theorem for groups, use induction on . Choose . If divides , then has order . Otherwise is a nontrivial normal subgroup of order prime to , and has smaller order still divisible by . Induction gives a coset of order ; any lift has order divisible by , because the order of its image divides its own order. A suitable power of then has order . This uses no classification of finite Abelian groups.
A semisimple module is a direct sum of simple modules. An algebra is semisimple when all its modules are semisimple. Suppose the left regular module is semisimple. Every module is a quotient of a free module , by sending its basis elements to a generating set of . This free module is a direct sum of simple modules.
A quotient of a direct sum of simple modules is semisimple: the images of its simple summands are simple or zero and span the quotient. Choose a maximal direct sum among these simple images, allowing all simple submodules in the choice. If it does not span the whole quotient, some simple image is not contained in it. Its intersection with that direct sum is zero by simplicity, so it could be added, contradicting maximality. For infinite index sets, Zorn's lemma supplies the maximal direct sum; in finite dimension the construction terminates directly.
Hence every is semisimple, and is a semisimple algebra. This proves semisimplicity from the regular module.
Choose in the simple module . The map , , is an -module homomorphism whose image is the nonzero submodule , hence all of . Thus the first isomorphism theorem for modules gives
The kernel is a maximal left ideal because the quotient is simple. Whenever the regular module has finite length, as it does for a finite-dimensional algebra, take a composition series of the kernel and append . Its last factor is , so occurs as a composition factor of the regular module; the Jordan–Hölder theorem for modules makes that independent of the chosen series.
The quotient conclusion holds for every unital algebra. If an arbitrary infinite-dimensional regular module has no finite composition series, the universally valid statement is that is a simple subquotient; a claim about the factors of a finite series requires finite length.
A simple module is nonzero and has no proper nonzero submodule. A composition series of a module is a finite strict chain of submodules with simple quotients . These quotients are the composition factors of the series.
The Jordan–Hölder theorem for modules says that if a module has a composition series, then any two such series have the same length and the same simple factors up to isomorphism and reordering. In particular, every finite-dimensional module has a well-defined multiset of composition factors.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact