Nuclear pore transport balance
ID: nuclear-pore-transport-balance
Nuclear accumulation should compare concentrations, not just total cargo. In an original constructed example, a cell nucleus occupies one volume unit and the accessible cytosol occupies nine. Of tracer units, are nuclear and are cytosolic. With the amounts and the accessible volume, the concentration ratio isOnly of the cargo is nuclear, yet nuclear concentration is four times cytosolic concentration. A majority outside the cell nucleus does not rule out nuclear enrichment.
For comparison, freely exchanging nonbinding cargo at equal concentrations would have : the nuclear fraction would equal the nuclear fraction of accessible volume, . These are constructed amounts, not measurements from the nuclear pore localization experiment. Binding, unequal recovery or cargo degradation would require additional accounting before interpreting an assay.
A minimal two-compartment ordinary differential equation makes the distinction precise. Assume fixed accessible volume, no synthesis or degradation, and effective first-order exchange rates :Total cargo is conserved. Setting the derivative to zero givesFor symmetric passive exchange with conductance , and , so the concentration ratio is one even when the amounts differ. Choosing instead and in reciprocal model-time units gives for . The exact ordinary differential equation solution isSubstitution verifies the solution, and makes departures decay. This effective model can describe an asymmetric exchange balance, but does not by itself identify a nuclear localization sequence, transport receptor or source of energy.
The usefulness of the nuclear pore complex is precisely this combination of separation and exchange: a cell nucleus can maintain a distinctive protein population while receiving new cargo and exporting RNA. The nuclear pore localization experiment asks what feature controls entry; the nuclear pore transport balance asks what an accumulation readout actually means.
New to topics? Read the docs here!