Let's try to understand some interesting looking, with a special focus on our understanding of the tiny E. Coli K-12 MG1655 operon thrLABC part of the metabolism, which we have well understood at Section "E. Coli K-12 MG1655 operon thrLABC".
reconstruction/ecoli/flat/compartments.tsvcontains cellular compartment information:"abbrev" "id" "n" "CCO-BAC-NUCLEOID" "j" "CCO-CELL-PROJECTION" "w" "CCO-CW-BAC-NEG" "c" "CCO-CYTOSOL" "e" "CCO-EXTRACELLULAR" "m" "CCO-MEMBRANE" "o" "CCO-OUTER-MEM" "p" "CCO-PERI-BAC" "l" "CCO-PILUS" "i" "CCO-PM-BAC-NEG"CCO: "Celular COmpartment"BAC-NUCLEOID: nucleoidCELL-PROJECTION: cell projectionCW-BAC-NEG: TODO confirm: cell wall (of a Gram-negative bacteria)CYTOSOL: cytosolEXTRACELLULAR: outside the cellMEMBRANE: cell membraneOUTER-MEM: bacterial outer membranePERI-BAC: periplasmPILUS: pilusPM-BAC-NEG: TODO: plasma membrane, but that is the same as cell membrane no?
reconstruction/ecoli/flat/promoters.tsvcontains promoter information. Simple file, sample lines:corresponds to E. Coli K-12 MG1655 promoter thrLp, which starts as position 148."position" "direction" "id" "name" 148 "+" "PM00249" "thrLp"reconstruction/ecoli/flat/proteins.tsvcontains protein information. Sample line corresponding to e. Coli K-12 MG1655 gene thrA:so we understand that:"aaCount" "name" "seq" "comments" "codingRnaSeq" "mw" "location" "rnaId" "id" "geneId" [91, 46, 38, 44, 12, 53, 30, 63, 14, 46, 89, 34, 23, 30, 29, 51, 34, 4, 20, 0, 69] "ThrA" "MRVL..." "Location information from Ecocyc dump." "AUGCGAGUGUUG..." [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 89103.51099999998, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ["c"] "EG10998_RNA" "ASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-MONOMER" "EG10998"aaCount: amino acid count, how many of each of the 20 proteinogenic amino acid are thereseq: full sequence, using the single letter abbreviation of the proteinogenic amino acidsmw; molecular weight? The 11 components appear to be given atreconstruction/ecoli/flat/scripts/unifyBulkFiles.py:so they simply classify the weight? Presumably this exists for complexes that have multiple classes?molecular_weight_keys = [ '23srRNA', '16srRNA', '5srRNA', 'tRNA', 'mRNA', 'miscRNA', 'protein', 'metabolite', 'water', 'DNA', 'RNA' # nonspecific RNA ]23srRNA,16srRNA,5srRNAare the three structural RNAs present in the ribosome: 23S ribosomal RNA, 16S ribosomal RNA, 5S ribosomal RNA, all others are obvious:- tRNA
- mRNA
- protein. This is the seventh class, and this enzyme only contains mass in this class as expected.
- metabolite
- water
- DNA
- RNA: TODO
rnavsmiscRNA
location: cell compartment where the protein is present,cdefined atreconstruction/ecoli/flat/compartments.tsvas cytoplasm, as expected for something that will make an amino acid
reconstruction/ecoli/flat/rnas.tsv: TODO vstranscriptionUnits.tsv. Sample lines:"halfLife" "name" "seq" "type" "modifiedForms" "monomerId" "comments" "mw" "location" "ntCount" "id" "geneId" "microarray expression" 174.0 "ThrA [RNA]" "AUGCGAGUGUUG..." "mRNA" [] "ASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-MONOMER" "" [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 790935.00399999996, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ["c"] [553, 615, 692, 603] "EG10998_RNA" "EG10998" 0.0005264904halfLife: half-lifemw: molecular weight, same as inreconstruction/ecoli/flat/proteins.tsv. This molecule only have weight in themRNAclass, as expected, as it just codes for a proteinlocation: same as inreconstruction/ecoli/flat/proteins.tsvntCount: nucleotide count for each of the ATGCmicroarray expression: presumably refers to DNA microarray for gene expression profiling, but what measure exactly?
reconstruction/ecoli/flat/sequence.fasta: FASTA DNA sequence, first two lines:>E. coli K-12 MG1655 U00096.2 (1 to 4639675 = 4639675 bp) AGCTTTTCATTCTGACTGCAACGGGCAATATGTCTCTGTGTGGATTAAAAAAAGAGTGTCTGATAGCAGCTTCTGreconstruction/ecoli/flat/transcriptionUnits.tsv: transcription units. We can observe for example the two different transcription units of the E. Coli K-12 MG1655 operon thrLABC in the lines:"expression_rate" "direction" "right" "terminator_id" "name" "promoter_id" "degradation_rate" "id" "gene_id" "left" 0.0 "f" 310 ["TERM0-1059"] "thrL" "PM00249" 0.198905992329492 "TU0-42486" ["EG11277"] 148 657.057317358791 "f" 5022 ["TERM_WC-2174"] "thrLABC" "PM00249" 0.231049060186648 "TU00178" ["EG10998", "EG10999", "EG11000", "EG11277"] 148promoter_id: matches promoter id inreconstruction/ecoli/flat/promoters.tsvgene_id: matches id inreconstruction/ecoli/flat/genes.tsvid: matches exactly those used in BioCyc, which is quite nice, might be more or less standardized:
reconstruction/ecoli/flat/genes.tsv"length" "name" "seq" "rnaId" "coordinate" "direction" "symbol" "type" "id" "monomerId" 66 "thr operon leader peptide" "ATGAAACGCATT..." "EG11277_RNA" 189 "+" "thrL" "mRNA" "EG11277" "EG11277-MONOMER" 2463 "ThrA" "ATGCGAGTGTTG" "EG10998_RNA" 336 "+" "thrA" "mRNA" "EG10998" "ASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-MONOMER"reconstruction/ecoli/flat/metabolites.tsvcontains metabolite information. Sample lines:In the case of the enzyme thrA, one of the two reactions it catalyzes is "L-aspartate 4-semialdehyde" into "Homoserine"."id" "mw7.2" "location" "HOMO-SER" 119.12 ["n", "j", "w", "c", "e", "m", "o", "p", "l", "i"] "L-ASPARTATE-SEMIALDEHYDE" 117.104 ["n", "j", "w", "c", "e", "m", "o", "p", "l", "i"]Starting from the enzyme page: biocyc.org/gene?orgid=ECOLI&id=EG10998 we reach the reaction page: biocyc.org/ECOLI/NEW-IMAGE?type=REACTION&object=HOMOSERDEHYDROG-RXN which has reaction IDHOMOSERDEHYDROG-RXN, and that page which clarifies the IDs:so these are the compounds that we care about.- biocyc.org/compound?orgid=ECOLI&id=L-ASPARTATE-SEMIALDEHYDE: "L-aspartate 4-semialdehyde" has ID
L-ASPARTATE-SEMIALDEHYDE - biocyc.org/compound?orgid=ECOLI&id=HOMO-SER: "Homoserine" has ID
HOMO-SER
- biocyc.org/compound?orgid=ECOLI&id=L-ASPARTATE-SEMIALDEHYDE: "L-aspartate 4-semialdehyde" has ID
reconstruction/ecoli/flat/reactions.tsvcontains chemical reaction information. Sample lines:"reaction id" "stoichiometry" "is reversible" "catalyzed by" "HOMOSERDEHYDROG-RXN-HOMO-SER/NAD//L-ASPARTATE-SEMIALDEHYDE/NADH/PROTON.51." {"NADH[c]": -1, "PROTON[c]": -1, "HOMO-SER[c]": 1, "L-ASPARTATE-SEMIALDEHYDE[c]": -1, "NAD[c]": 1} false ["ASPKINIIHOMOSERDEHYDROGII-CPLX", "ASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-CPLX"] "HOMOSERDEHYDROG-RXN-HOMO-SER/NADP//L-ASPARTATE-SEMIALDEHYDE/NADPH/PROTON.53." {"NADPH[c]": -1, "NADP[c]": 1, "PROTON[c]": -1, "L-ASPARTATE-SEMIALDEHYDE[c]": -1, "HOMO-SER[c]": 1 false ["ASPKINIIHOMOSERDEHYDROGII-CPLX", "ASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-CPLX"]catalized by: here we seeASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-CPLX, which we can guess is a protein complex made out ofASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-MONOMER, which is the ID for thethrAwe care about! This is confirmed incomplexationReactions.tsv.
reconstruction/ecoli/flat/complexationReactions.tsvcontains information about chemical reactions that produce protein complexes:The"process" "stoichiometry" "id" "dir" "complexation" [ { "molecule": "ASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-CPLX", "coeff": 1, "type": "proteincomplex", "location": "c", "form": "mature" }, { "molecule": "ASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-MONOMER", "coeff": -4, "type": "proteinmonomer", "location": "c", "form": "mature" } ] "ASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-CPLX_RXN" 1coeffis how many monomers need to get together for form the final complex. This can be seen from the Summary section of ecocyc.org/gene?orgid=ECOLI&id=ASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-MONOMER:Fantastic literature summary! Can't find that in database form there however.Aspartate kinase I / homoserine dehydrogenase I comprises a dimer of ThrA dimers. Although the dimeric form is catalytically active, the binding equilibrium dramatically favors the tetrameric form. The aspartate kinase and homoserine dehydrogenase activities of each ThrA monomer are catalyzed by independent domains connected by a linker region.
reconstruction/ecoli/flat/proteinComplexes.tsvcontains protein complex information:"name" "comments" "mw" "location" "reactionId" "id" "aspartate kinase / homoserine dehydrogenase" "" [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 356414.04399999994, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ["c"] "ASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-CPLX_RXN" "ASPKINIHOMOSERDEHYDROGI-CPLX"reconstruction/ecoli/flat/protein_half_lives.tsvcontains the half-life of proteins. Very few proteins are listed however for some reason.reconstruction/ecoli/flat/tfIds.csv: transcription factors information:"TF" "geneId" "oneComponentId" "twoComponentId" "nonMetaboliteBindingId" "activeId" "notes" "arcA" "EG10061" "PHOSPHO-ARCA" "PHOSPHO-ARCA" "fnr" "EG10325" "FNR-4FE-4S-CPLX" "FNR-4FE-4S-CPLX" "dksA" "EG10230"
reconstruction/ecoli/flat/condition/nutrient/minimal.tsvcontains the nutrients in a minimal environment in which the cell survives:If we compare that to"molecule id" "lower bound (units.mmol / units.g / units.h)" "upper bound (units.mmol / units.g / units.h)" "ADP[c]" 3.15 3.15 "PI[c]" 3.15 3.15 "PROTON[c]" 3.15 3.15 "GLC[p]" NaN 20 "OXYGEN-MOLECULE[p]" NaN NaN "AMMONIUM[c]" NaN NaN "PI[p]" NaN NaN "K+[p]" NaN NaN "SULFATE[p]" NaN NaN "FE+2[p]" NaN NaN "CA+2[p]" NaN NaN "CL-[p]" NaN NaN "CO+2[p]" NaN NaN "MG+2[p]" NaN NaN "MN+2[p]" NaN NaN "NI+2[p]" NaN NaN "ZN+2[p]" NaN NaN "WATER[p]" NaN NaN "CARBON-DIOXIDE[p]" NaN NaN "CPD0-1958[p]" NaN NaN "L-SELENOCYSTEINE[c]" NaN NaN "GLC-D-LACTONE[c]" NaN NaN "CYTOSINE[c]" NaN NaNreconstruction/ecoli/flat/condition/nutrient/minimal_plus_amino_acids.tsv, we see that it adds the 20 amino acids on top of the minimal condition:so we guess that"L-ALPHA-ALANINE[p]" NaN NaN "ARG[p]" NaN NaN "ASN[p]" NaN NaN "L-ASPARTATE[p]" NaN NaN "CYS[p]" NaN NaN "GLT[p]" NaN NaN "GLN[p]" NaN NaN "GLY[p]" NaN NaN "HIS[p]" NaN NaN "ILE[p]" NaN NaN "LEU[p]" NaN NaN "LYS[p]" NaN NaN "MET[p]" NaN NaN "PHE[p]" NaN NaN "PRO[p]" NaN NaN "SER[p]" NaN NaN "THR[p]" NaN NaN "TRP[p]" NaN NaN "TYR[p]" NaN NaN "L-SELENOCYSTEINE[c]" NaN NaN "VAL[p]" NaN NaNNaNin theupper moundlikely means infinite.We can try to understand the less obvious ones:ADP: TODOPI: TODOPROTON[c]: presumably a measure of pHGLC[p]: glucose, this can be seen by comparingminimal.tsvwithminimal_no_glucose.tsvAMMONIUM: ammonium. This appears to be the primary source of nitrogen atoms for producing amino acids.CYTOSINE[c]: hmmm, why is external cytosine needed? Weird.
reconstruction/ecoli/flat/reconstruction/ecoli/flat/condition/timeseries/contains sequences of conditions for each time. For example:reconstruction/ecoli/flat/reconstruction/ecoli/flat/condition/timeseries/000000_basal.tsvcontains:which means just using"time (units.s)" "nutrients" 0 "minimal"reconstruction/ecoli/flat/condition/nutrient/minimal.tsvuntil infinity. That is the default one used byrunSim.py, as can be seen from./out/manual/wildtype_000000/000000/generation_000000/000000/simOut/Environment/attributes/nutrientTimeSeriesLabelwhich contains just000000_basal.reconstruction/ecoli/flat/reconstruction/ecoli/flat/condition/timeseries/000001_cut_glucose.tsvis more interesting and contains:so we see that this will shift the conditions half-way to a condition that will eventually kill the bacteria because it will run out of glucose and thus energy!"time (units.s)" "nutrients" 0 "minimal" 1200 "minimal_no_glucose"
Timeseries can be selected with--variant nutrientTimeSeries X Y, see also: run variants.We can use that variant with:VARIANT="condition" FIRST_VARIANT_INDEX=1 LAST_VARIANT_INDEX=1 python runscripts/manual/runSim.pyreconstruction/ecoli/flat/condition/condition_defs.tsvcontains lines of form:"condition" "nutrients" "genotype perturbations" "doubling time (units.min)" "active TFs" "basal" "minimal" {} 44.0 [] "no_oxygen" "minimal_minus_oxygen" {} 100.0 [] "with_aa" "minimal_plus_amino_acids" {} 25.0 ["CPLX-125", "MONOMER0-162", "CPLX0-7671", "CPLX0-228", "MONOMER0-155"]conditionrefers to entries inreconstruction/ecoli/flat/condition/condition_defs.tsvnutrientsrefers to entries underreconstruction/ecoli/flat/condition/nutrient/, e.g.reconstruction/ecoli/flat/condition/nutrient/minimal.tsvorreconstruction/ecoli/flat/condition/nutrient/minimal_plus_amino_acids.tsvgenotype perturbations: there aren't any in the file, but this suggests that genotype modifications can also be incorporated heredoubling time: TODO experimental data? Because this should be a simulation output, right? Or do they cheat and fix doubling by time?active TFs: this suggests that they are cheating transcription factors here, as those would ideally be functions of other more basic inputs
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.