Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 25I b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Since , Gauss-Bonnet gives , hence . If , the integral of the continuous nonnegative function is zero, so vanishes everywhere.
That is impossible for a compact regular surface in . Choose maximizing the Euclidean distance from the origin, after translating the origin off the surface if necessary. The sphere centered at the origin through is a supporting sphere. The supporting-sphere curvature bound shows that both principal curvatures at have the same sign and nonzero magnitude, so . Therefore , and . The classification theorem for surfaces now shows that is diffeomorphic to the sphere.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 25I a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
For a compact oriented regular surface without boundary, the Gauss-Bonnet theorem statesHere is the Gaussian curvature, the product of the two principal curvatures; is the area element induced by the first fundamental form; and is the Euler characteristic. If is connected and has genus , the classification theorem for surfaces gives , so
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 23I c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Taking the Fourier transform of the equation in the sense of distributions givesThe Fourier multiplieris everywhere positive. Define . Sincewe haveThus exists and obeys the required estimate. If two solutions existed, their difference would have ; positivity of proves uniqueness.
A classical solution needs continuous derivatives through order four. Applying the Sobolev embedding theorem with to shows that this is guaranteed whenor equivalently
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 23I b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Let be a multi-index with . The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality givesThe second integral is finite precisely under the sufficient inequality , which follows from . Hence is Lebesgue integrable for every .
The Fourier inversion theorem therefore defines a functionwhose derivatives through order may be obtained by differentiating under the integral sign. Those derivatives are continuous, so . The inverse transform represents the same tempered distribution as ; consequently almost everywhere. This is the Sobolev embedding theorem in this range.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 23I a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Let be the space of tempered distributions. For , the Sobolev space iswith normChanging the normalization of the Fourier transform changes this norm only by a fixed constant.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 22I c ii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 22I c i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 22I b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Write with every equicontinuous. Its closure is still equicontinuous, because uniform limits preserve the same oscillation inequalities. The Baire category theorem applied to the Banach space shows that some has nonempty interior. Hence there are and such that the open ball lies in .
Fix . Equicontinuity of gives a neighborhood of on which every member of changes by less than . If were distinct from , the normality of a compact Hausdorff space and the Urysohn lemma would give with , , and . Both and belong to , yeta contradiction. Thus , so every point is isolated and is a discrete space. A compact discrete space is finite, since its cover by singleton open sets has a finite subcover.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 22I a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
A family is equicontinuous if for every and there is a neighborhood of such thatfor every and every . The Arzelà-Ascoli theorem says that, for a compact Hausdorff space , a subset of has compact closure in the uniform norm if and only if it is equicontinuous and pointwise bounded. On compact , equicontinuity and pointwise boundedness together imply uniform boundedness.
For necessity, a compact closure is totally bounded. Given , choose a finite -net . The finitely many continuous functions are simultaneously continuous near each point, and comparison with a nearby proves equicontinuity of the whole family. Evaluation at any fixed point is a continuous map or , so compactness also gives pointwise boundedness.
Conversely, equicontinuity gives, around each , a neighborhood on which every oscillates by less than . Compactness supplies a finite such cover with selected points . Pointwise boundedness makes the set of vectorsa bounded subset of a finite-dimensional normed vector space, so it has a finite -net. Choose one function of for every nonempty cell of this net. If two functions have evaluation vectors in the same cell, then comparison at a selected and the two oscillation bounds show that their uniform distance is less than . Thus is totally bounded. Since is a Banach space, its closure is complete; a complete totally bounded metric space is compact, proving the theorem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 21F c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
No. Here is the pair of pants, and part (b) gives , whereasIf made homotopic to the identity map of the torus, functoriality of homology and homotopy invariance of homology would giveon . But factors through the zero group , so the left side is zero while the right side is the identity on , a contradiction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 21F b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Let be the surface with boundary obtained by deleting the interiors of the disks. By excision,so and the other relative groups vanish. In the long exact sequence in relative homology, the mapsends an orientation class to , up to an overall choice of sign. It is therefore injective and has cokernel . Exactness gives and a short exact sequenceThis sequence splits because its right-hand group is a free abelian group. Since is connected, we obtain
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 21F a ii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 19F b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Every element of is conjugate to exactly one representative of one of these types, with the indicated parameter identifications:
- , where ;
- , where ;
- , where , , and is unordered;
- , where is identified with .
The projective line has points. A line is fixed exactly when it is an eigenline over , so the permutation character takes respectively the valuesThe action is two-transitive. Part (a) therefore giveswhere the nontrivial constituent is irreducible of degree , the Steinberg representation of GL2 over a finite field. Its values on the four types are
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 19F a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Burnside lemma says that the number of orbits of a finite group on a finite set isIndeed, double-count the set . Counting first by gives the numerator. Counting first by gives ; each orbit contributes by the orbit-stabilizer theorem, proving the formula.
Let be the character of the permutation representation. Thenis, by Burnside's lemma, the number of orbits on . A two-transitive group action has exactly two such orbits: the diagonal and the ordered pairs of distinct points. Hence . Transitivity also gives . If is its irreducible character decomposition, then , so exactly one nontrivial irreducible character occurs, with multiplicity one. Thus the permutation character has precisely two distinct irreducible summands.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 18G b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
The symmetric group acts on the three partitions of four roots into two unordered pairs. The resulting homomorphism has kernel the Klein four-group . If is a square and the characteristic is not two, the discriminant criterion for an alternating Galois group gives , and its image on the three resolvent roots lies in .
For an irreducible quartic, is transitive on four roots, and its only possibilities inside are and . The resolvent is irreducible exactly when the image acts transitively on its three roots, equivalently when that image is . ThusThe printed statement omits the needed irreducibility hypothesis on . Literally it is false: has square discriminant and Galois group , and its resolvent is irreducible. Without quartic irreducibility, a reducible resolvent only implies , allowing the trivial group, , or .
For the specified polynomial ,Its resolvent is . Modulo this is , which has no root in and is therefore an irreducible cubic. The quartic is given to be irreducible, so the preceding criterion yields
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 18G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Let . Its polynomial discriminant isThe squared Vandermonde determinant is a symmetric polynomial in the roots. By the Fundamental theorem of symmetric polynomials, it is a polynomial in their elementary symmetric functions, which are the coefficients of by Vieta formulas; hence . Equivalently, the resultant formula puts it directly in .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 16H c iii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 16H c ii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 16H c i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 16H b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
The set is nonempty because it contains . Every nonempty chain has an upper bound in by hypothesis. Since every member of is at least , one has , so . Zorn lemma therefore gives a maximal element of . If in , then , and maximality in forces . Thus is maximal in and satisfies .
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.