If is a fixed point of , then
Conversely, applying the same argument to transports every fixed point of back to one of . Thus the bijection restricts to a bijection between the two fixed-point sets, so conjugate functions have the same number of fixed points.
A set is countable when it is finite or admits a bijection with a subset of ; equivalently, its elements can be listed in a sequence. The integers are countable, for example in the order . Enumerating pairs by diagonals, or applying the Cantor pairing function, then shows that is countable.
Suppose instead that the power set had an enumeration . The Cantor diagonal argument forms
For every , the set differs from at the element , so it is absent from the alleged enumeration. Therefore
In the RSA cryptosystem, choose distinct large primes , put , and choose coprime to
The decryption exponent is the modular multiplicative inverse
Thus . For a message with , the Fermat-Euler theorem gives
For , . The extended Euclidean algorithm gives
so
The Fermat-Euler theorem states that if , then
Let be a reduced residue system modulo . Multiplication by permutes these classes, because implies . Hence
Every is invertible modulo , so cancellation gives .
The Euler totient function is the number of residue classes modulo that are coprime to . The Chinese remainder theorem says that for pairwise coprime moduli , reduction induces a bijection
It restricts to a bijection of unit groups. If is squarefree, then
Each of the primes is one more than a power of two, so every squarefree product of them has power-of-two totient. Ten odd examples are
For the rotation group , the identity fixes all colorings. Because five is prime, each of the four nonidentity rotations is a single five-cycle and fixes exactly the constant colorings. Burnside lemma therefore gives the number of coloring necklaces
For the dihedral group , the five reflections each fix one vertex and interchange two pairs of vertices, so each fixes colorings. Adding these to the identity and rotation contributions gives the number of coloring bracelets
The singleton orbits are exactly . Every other orbit represented by has size by the orbit-stabilizer theorem. Partitioning into its orbits of a group action therefore gives
For the second identity, count
in two ways. Holding fixed gives
Holding fixed gives . Each orbit contributes points, each with stabilizer size , and hence contributes . Thus , proving Burnside lemma:
False. Compositions of scalings and inversion reduce to one of the forms or ; they preserve the unordered pair . But
is a Möbius transformation fixing and sends infinity to , so it cannot be such a composition.
True. A Möbius transformation fixes infinity exactly when , so it has the affine form
This is the composition of the scaling and the translation .
True. Conjugate the unique fixed point to infinity. The resulting map lies in the Affine subgroup of the Möbius group, so it has the form . A unique fixed point forces and ; otherwise would have a finite fixed point as well. Conjugation by the scaling changes into . Thus a nonidentity Möbius transformation with one fixed point is conjugate to a translation.
Write the Möbius transformation as
A finite fixed point of a Möbius transformation satisfies
If three distinct points of the Riemann sphere are fixed, this quadratic is identically zero, with the usual interpretation when one point is infinity. Hence and , so . A nonidentity transformation's fixed-point equation is a nonzero polynomial of degree at most two on the sphere, and therefore it has one repeated fixed point or two distinct fixed points.
Now , so the orbit is bound. Since , the initial energy is
At the farthest central-force radial turning point , the radial speed vanishes and the transverse speed is , giving
Equating these expressions and multiplying by yields
Thus , , and .
The central force conserves angular momentum. The initial impact parameter gives , while at closest approach the velocity is transverse and . Thus . Conservation of energy gives
Under , neglect the initial potential term and substitute :
Consequently
Green theorem states that for a positively oriented planar region ,
Here and , so
The stated orientations make the positive boundary of the region inside the radius- circle and outside the radius- circle. Its area is regardless of the inner circle's center. Therefore
Set . The relation is exactly
It is therefore the equivalence relation induced by a function: equality of the two function values is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Hence this is an equivalence relation.
This relation is reflexive because choosing gives . It need not be symmetric: take positive real numbers and . Then is rational, so . But
is transcendental, hence irrational, for every integer . Thus , and the relation is not an equivalence relation.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.