By the equality condition in the complex triangle inequality,
for nonzero exactly when is a positive real number. Having the same complex argument is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, so this is an equivalence relation. Its classes are the open rays from the origin.
An equivalence relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Here
The relation is reflexive and symmetric, but it is not transitive. For example, take
The real parts of and are positive, whereas that of is negative. Hence this is not an equivalence relation.
The product of two transpositions has three possible forms. Equal transpositions produce the identity, transpositions meeting in one letter produce a three-cycle, and disjoint transpositions produce two disjoint two-cycles. There are two three-cycles on each chosen triple and three pairings of each chosen four-set. Therefore the number of distinct permutations representable this way is
Choose the support of the four-cycle and then cyclically order it. A chosen set of four letters has distinct cycles, so the answer is
There are even letters. The stated condition and injectivity force the even letters to permute among themselves, which can be done in ways. The remaining odd letters must then permute among themselves. Thus the number is
A transposition exchanges exactly two letters and fixes the rest. A permutation cycle sends each displayed letter to the next, sends to , and fixes all other letters.
After imposing , the remaining domain elements may be sent bijectively to the remaining values in arbitrary order. Hence the number is
In the parent's rest frame, momentum conservation makes the massive daughter and photon momenta equal and opposite, of magnitude . The relativistic two-body decay formulas give
Since and ,
The daughter's Lorentz factor is
If it decays after proper time , time dilation gives , while uniform motion gives . Therefore the event coordinates in the parent frame are
Let the photon energies be and their momentum angle be . Conservation of four-momentum and the null photon momenta give
Using ,
Thus the opening angle depends only on the parent rest energy and the two photon energies.
Suppose are solutions and put . Then and satisfies the homogeneous Robin boundary condition
For , Green's first identity gives
The left side is nonnegative, so both sides vanish and . For , the Dirichlet boundary condition on and the same identity again imply . The solution is therefore unique for every .
For a regular spherically symmetric solution, the Laplacian equation is
Regularity at the origin gives , hence . Applying the boundary condition at yields
At the Neumann boundary condition would require , which is impossible for . Equivalently, its compatibility condition would require .
Writing and differentiating gives
Its symmetric second-rank tensor part and antisymmetric second-rank tensor part are
Taking the trace makes the two symmetric terms cancel, so the divergence is
Contracting the antisymmetric part with the Levi-Civita symbol gives the curl
In suffix notation,
where is the Kronecker delta. Since , the chain rule gives
Rolle theorem states that if is continuous on the closed interval between two distinct points, differentiable between them, and has equal endpoint values, then vanishes at an interior point.
Let and, for , put
Then and for . Applying Rolle's theorem successively times gives a point , , where . Hence
which is the stated Taylor theorem with Lagrange remainder.
If , the case gives . Thus is constant; equivalently this is the immediate corollary of the mean value theorem.
Assume the direction vectors are nonzero. The cross product equation is equivalent to
so is parallel to and the locus is the line .
For nonparallel directions, is normal to both lines. Projecting their displacement onto the corresponding unit vector gives the distance between skew lines
If the directions are parallel, the corresponding formula is
Expanding the squared Euclidean distances gives
Thus one may take
The normal is parallel to , so is its perpendicular bisector. If lies on both and , then , hence it also lies on . Geometrically, the three perpendicular bisectors of the noncollinear triangle concur at its circumcenter.
For , set . The ordinary change of variables formula gives
Taking is exactly the defining limit of the improper integral. By the improper power integral, it converges for , and
Define . By the fundamental theorem of calculus, . The chain rule gives
Integrating from to and using , yields the change of variables formula
The argument also covers a decreasing because both integrals are oriented.
All values of the complex logarithm are
Because , one may take the complex argument . Consequently

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.